Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-07-2009 @ 5:58PM
Royal said...
I always had issues with the labels OT and MT.
First, some fights Blizz sets up don't have well defined MT and OT roles like Razorscale. Both tanks need to get adds and swap on the boss.
Second during a raid, I switch tanking depending what the tank is good at. For example as a DK with inpterupts, I get Jax and the warrior/paly with stuns can control the adds.
Third, it really implies a ranked position between the two as if MTing should be reserved for the better tank. In some fights, I want the more geared or more experienced tank on the adds. There are plenty of fights were the "OT" position is a lot harder than the "MT" position.