Blizzard helps authorities track fugitive
Blizzard helped an Indiana sheriff track an allegedly drug-dealing, definitely WoW-playing fugitive to Canada. Sheriff's Deputy Matt Roberson, who used to play World of Warcraft, discovered that Alfred Hightower aka Rastlynn, was an avid player. So he contacted Blizzard with a request for help in locating his quarry. Three months later, Blizzard sent Roberson a package containing Rastlynn's IP address, billing address and other info. After finding out the fugitive's latitude and longitude from his IP, Roberson used Google Search to pinpoint Rastlynn's exact location. With the cooperation of Canadian authorities, Hightower has been deported and now awaits his fate in the U.S.
Usually it is Blizzard that is calling the police for help, as in the cases of:
But here, Blizzard cooperated with a request from authorities with no lives at stake and without being legally bound to do so. Also, his character name was not only provided to the police, but also published in the Kokomo online news publication. So, now we all know that Rastlynn the resto shaman has most definitely been naughty.
Should Blizzard have cooperated with authorities in this case? There was a warrant out for his arrest since 2007, but he was not actually convicted of a crime and presumably did not use WoW to commit his crimes. I can see the reasoning behind giving the information in this case, to stay friendly with law enforcement. But what about cases in other countries where the local laws infringe on their citizens' civil liberties?
For example, many countries don't have freedom of speech and will arrest those who voice subversive opinions, say against election results. Iranian protesters used Twitter to report on post-election activities and express their opinions, because most other online sources were more easily tracked -- and many died for their troubles. Would Blizzard comply with local government requests in cases such as this? (There are also many who argue that the war on drugs is an infringement on our liberties, but that's a discussion best left to other publications.)
I guess the lesson we need to learn from this is that Blizzard has a large amount of personal information about their active subscribers and are willing to share that info with law enforcement agencies. If you aren't wanted for any crimes or committing any in-game, it shouldn't worry you -- for now. But if you are a shady dealer running from the law, you may want to stay out of Azeroth.
[Thanks for the tip, Max!]
Usually it is Blizzard that is calling the police for help, as in the cases of:
- The teenager who threatened to blow up a plane using in-game chat.
- The kid who threatened to kill himself if his ban wasn't removed.
- The teen who was arrested for making a suicide threat to a GM.
But here, Blizzard cooperated with a request from authorities with no lives at stake and without being legally bound to do so. Also, his character name was not only provided to the police, but also published in the Kokomo online news publication. So, now we all know that Rastlynn the resto shaman has most definitely been naughty.
Should Blizzard have cooperated with authorities in this case? There was a warrant out for his arrest since 2007, but he was not actually convicted of a crime and presumably did not use WoW to commit his crimes. I can see the reasoning behind giving the information in this case, to stay friendly with law enforcement. But what about cases in other countries where the local laws infringe on their citizens' civil liberties?
For example, many countries don't have freedom of speech and will arrest those who voice subversive opinions, say against election results. Iranian protesters used Twitter to report on post-election activities and express their opinions, because most other online sources were more easily tracked -- and many died for their troubles. Would Blizzard comply with local government requests in cases such as this? (There are also many who argue that the war on drugs is an infringement on our liberties, but that's a discussion best left to other publications.)
I guess the lesson we need to learn from this is that Blizzard has a large amount of personal information about their active subscribers and are willing to share that info with law enforcement agencies. If you aren't wanted for any crimes or committing any in-game, it shouldn't worry you -- for now. But if you are a shady dealer running from the law, you may want to stay out of Azeroth.
[Thanks for the tip, Max!]
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, News items







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 8)
Eamara Dec 31st 2009 5:05PM
Go Blizzard. :D Definitely the right thing was done here. I'm just worried that other criminals who play WoW will quit, to avoid being caught. Less chance that justice will be done. :(
But yeah, who cares about privacy and whatnot when this guy was ruining lives by dealing drugs. If there are people who are worried about invasion of privacy, then remember this: if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide.
Sleutel Dec 31st 2009 5:10PM
So you don't mind if I come over to your house and rummage through your stuff? Whenever I want? After all, you've got nothing to hide, right?
This is one of the most naive and un-American things I've ever seen in my life.
Coldbear Dec 31st 2009 5:17PM
"...a man wanted on charges of dealing in a schedule III controlled substance and dealing in a schedule IV controlled substance, and two charges of dealing in marijuana. A warrant was issued for his arrest in 2007."
The guy already had an outstanding warrant - I don't see how Blizzard helping the authorities is a bad thing in this specific case. If this happens with a political activist wanted by the Chinese Gov't, though... ouch.
I don't want the cops coming over to trash my home anymore than anyone else, but this case seems pretty cut and dry.
n1nesp1ne Dec 31st 2009 5:20PM
This is not in any way un-American. You remind me of the people who think their inability to say what they want on the forums is a violation of their First Amendment rights. If a *fugitive* is using any business' services, it's a very simply process to obtain a subpoena for the information about their purchases to help track them down. In most cases, the business in question will gladly forfeit the information because they know that waiting for the subpoena is a waste of everybody's time and such information is rarely considered private (exceptions include things like doctor patient confidentiality, not shaman blizzard confidentiality). The fugitive has no right to privacy in this case, and even if he did, the Warcraft terms of service clearly state that Blizzard has free reign over your in-game activities. Your IP is not private.
Braundo Dec 31st 2009 5:28PM
I was with you until you said "if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide."
m0l0b0l0 Dec 31st 2009 5:44PM
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
EteNew Dec 31st 2009 6:02PM
Just want to add my 2 cents, but I can't say I didn't have some lament directed at the "If you've done nothing wrong, you got nothing to hide." statement. Just my point of view here, but in saying a statement like that, it comes off as if the speaker is OK with having his or her stuffed searched at anytime because he has nothing to hide. While this maybe true and all well, it is still required by law enforcement and such to have the proper suspicions along with whatever evidence to do the search in the first place. So, even if one person has nothing to hide and thinks whatever about privacy laws, the right of privacy is still fairly important and if asked to have your place searched or what have you, it is always important to ask under what premise the search is being conducted.
However, as for this guy, yep, this was both the lawful and moral choice to hand over information to the police. Once the authorities have evidence and such against you, it is fairly easy to get the proper rights to obtain any and all sorts of information/evidence on this guy; especially if it is involved in bringing him to justice.
So yeah, this guy got what was coming. Just wanted to remind others that the right to privacy is still important and even if you believe you have nothing to hide, once you allow a search to be conducted, they can get you on any other laws you maybe breaking without even realizing it and you can be subjected to the proper fines and such. Although not commonly done to my knowledge since there is a certain understanding with law enforcement (I mean, we are all human and mistakes happen) that certain outdated laws still on the books are silly or don't need to be officially processed; just always something to keep in mind.
Eddy Dec 31st 2009 6:04PM
That "if you've done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide" comment really chafes me as well. If I, for example, was a closeted homosexual or a member of an unpopular political party, I might not want my employers to know. I might have plenty that I would like to hide about my personal life- but I wouldn't consider a nonviolent political cause or a non-mainstream lifestyle choice something "wrong".
Eamara Dec 31st 2009 7:06PM
@Sleutel
If you were a part of the proper authorities and the search of my posessions was necessary for a criminal investigation, then sure, go ahead.
@Eddy
Ideally those examples you bring up would not be anything that would negatively affect your career or social standing. Therefore it would not be something you felt you needed to hide, thus you wouldn't. I'm not naive enough to think that there are still some prejudiced and closed-minded people in the world, however. All this said however, I wouldn't believe your examples would affect a criminal investigation, which is the context my comment was made in.
If they do, well. That's another problem entirely.
PrymalDark Dec 31st 2009 7:14PM
Quote:"Privacy no longer can mean anonymity," says Donald Kerr, principal deputy director of national intelligence. "Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information."
Did you catch that? You're expected to give up control of your privacy to others, who -- presumably -- get to decide how much of it you deserve. That's what loss of liberty looks like.
Well, I feel much safer now, thank you for doing your part to rid ourselves of this pesky liberty. Matters of import are best left to the government. (/sarcasm)
Terethall Dec 31st 2009 7:19PM
But yeah, who cares about privacy and whatnot...
This guy was ruining other people's lives by allowing them to purchase something dangerous. Just like people who sell guns. Or kitchen knives. Or plastic bags. Or toys with small parts. Or addictive online games.
OHHHHHHH, I JUST WENT THERE.
PrymalDark Dec 31st 2009 7:28PM
Quote:This guy was ruining other people's lives by allowing them to purchase something dangerous. Just like people who sell guns. Or kitchen knives. Or plastic bags. Or toys with small parts. Or addictive online games.
Lets examine this a moment, first, imagine a deadly automotive disaster, the driver going too fast and careening over a cliff.
{Anguished Mother}: Oh Noes! Officer, I want Joe Salesperson arrested this instant!
{Officer}: On what grounds Ma'am?
{Anguished Mother}: He sold my child the vehice.
{Officer}: AT ONCE!
Moral: Don't blame the product and/or supply chain when it was the individual's choice/fault.
obarthelemy Dec 31st 2009 8:12PM
"if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide". Depends...
1- who defines right and wrong ? I'm sure I've done a bunch a things that are very wrong, and illegal, in some places, belief/legal systems, and/or times. I wouldn't have passed MacCarthyism in the US unscathed. Or even the modern US: I had my 15- or 16- yo niece drink champagne with me a few years ago for new year's eve ! Consuming and reselling marijuana is legal in some places, not really punished in others, punished by death elsewhere... as is being gay, having sex with 12, 16, 18, 21 year olds, or just having sex w/o being married...
2- who enforces right and wrong ? It's one thing to create laws, and another to make sure they are enforced equally for every one, with no corruption, distortion, unfairness. I seem to remember recent articles about a US judge receiving compensation for sending teenagers to a (private) jail for trivialities...
3- who "enforces" on the "enforcers" ?
Blizzard helping the US justice system locate a fugitive may be mostly fine. SHould they do the same in China ? North Korea ? Iran ?
Tribunal Dec 31st 2009 9:20PM
Blizzard has the right to give up whatever information they see fit as long as it doesn't conflict with their privacy policy. You agreed to that policy and to providing them with such information when you agreed to play the game. I promise that there is a line in the privacy policy about "cooperating with law enforcement officials", otherwise they couldn't even respond to a legal subpoena.
What is slightly disturbing is the seeming willingness witch which Blizz did give up the info. I really hope there was a subpoena/warrant involved (depending on exactly what information was given)... there's a difference between responding to a legitimate query, as ruled by a judge, and just allowing any law enforcement officer to go on a fact-finding, hope-we-get-lucky look-see on a whim.
Either way, privacy is not actually an explicit right. At best it is implicit in the provisions against self-incrimination and unreasonable search. BUT, again, at the point that the police interacted with the data, it was Blizzard's data. And they were not incriminating themselves, nor did they obviously consider the search unreasonable.
The issue becomes that Blizzard's views on privacy and the views on privacy that are held by some of it's users differ. Sadly, the answer is to either try to change the law, quit playing, or get over it.
Snark Jan 1st 2010 2:00AM
If you've done nothing wrong, then people shouldn't be invading your privacy.
Utakata Jan 1st 2010 5:21AM
Who needs a rat when you have Blizzard.
Hoggersbud Jan 1st 2010 9:46AM
>But yeah, who cares about privacy and whatnot when this guy was ruining lives by dealing drugs. <
Please apply this same principle to your local tobacco vendors.
Please.
Minimagicma Dec 31st 2009 5:07PM
that is amazing way to go blizzard!
Tyr Dec 31st 2009 5:08PM
Rofl, google search...
Ziberious Dec 31st 2009 6:00PM
Lol, I can just see it now:
*Police recieve e-mail of IP address)
Police Officer- GOT IT!
*Police Officer types in madly, brings up google search (via Command Prompt)
*types in IP address, camera zooms in onto his face*
Police Officer- My God...