Account Administration encouraged not to restore hacked characters

Please see the update to this original post.
If the player does not accept this care package, they are then forced to go into a character restoration queue that is consistently several days to weeks long. According to sources familiar with the situation, this "care package policy" has been implemented in order to lighten the work load of those Blizzard employees who perform account restorations. Similar policies have existed at other times account compromises have been high, such as during the transition from Vanilla WoW to The Burning Crusade.
This care package being offered consists of the following:
- 2,500 gold
- 2 Emblems of Frost
- 10 Emblems of Triumph for every day the players has had to wait to receive the care package
WoW.com believes that this practice, while potentially making some sense logistically, stands firmly against the best interest of the players. Sources that we have spoken with tell us most account administrators do not agree with this policy, however their hands are tied due to Blizzard management (it is their job, after all, and they have to do as they're told).
WoW.com believes Blizzard can do a better job at solving long restoration queue times without placing player's hard work as a secondary concern. Instead of offering players a care package, Blizzard can employ more staff, and as we will discuss in a later post, train those staff in better ways to prevent account compromises and exploitation. The serious consideration given to mandatory authenticators is also part of this solution.
Filed under: Blizzard, News items, Account Security
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 3 of 21)
Rathwirt Jan 8th 2010 11:03AM
What's great about this article is that in the links below it, it advertises how to buy wow accounts and make money playing WoW.
YAY SPONSORED LINKS!
Adam Holisky Jan 8th 2010 11:05AM
That will be dealt with immediately. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Hal Jan 8th 2010 11:19AM
Adam, your avatar is appropriate for the situation.
/facepalm
Adam Holisky Jan 8th 2010 11:20AM
I've spoken with people and this is being taken care of in the most expedient manner possible. Obviously, this is part of a larger partner linking thing (with WordPress), and in no way does WoW.com or the Joystiq network support anything like that.
This has "just made my day."
But it is being solved, so that's good at least.
Retlaw Jan 8th 2010 11:29AM
I have to say, if WoW.com was really against gold sellers, they wouldn't have their adds on the site. Money > Integrity
Retlaw Jan 8th 2010 11:29AM
My apologies on the previous post. I made it before Adam's post explained it. Again, my apologies.
Speedmonkay Jan 8th 2010 3:11PM
About as good as when Activision started all the ads on the WoW official site and forums and they started showing gold selling and account services ads.
Tom Jan 8th 2010 11:19AM
If they make authenticators mandatory i will stop playing. It is more of a chore then anything. I used one for a day before I got rid of it. I am sure blizzard knows they will lose customers over it.
Retlaw Jan 8th 2010 11:29AM
and I'm sure if your account gets hacked, you'll QQ the loudest.
garthas Jan 8th 2010 11:29AM
Well then you are retarded. Why would you not want to protect your account no matter the game? WoW gets hacked because it is huge and popular. if EQ2 or some other lesser game had this issue I would also protect my account.
But hackers dont care about those games.
Aion gets hacked as well
Namy Jan 8th 2010 11:31AM
A chore? All you have to do is press a button and type in some numbers. Why is that more of a chore than potentially having your account hacked and then waiting ages for Blizz to restore it?
DrHockey Jan 8th 2010 11:40AM
Is it really a chore? It takes approximately 10 additional seconds to log in with an authenticator. I find it highly unlikely that WOW will loose a significant # of subscribers if mandatory authentication is required.
If it really is a concern, perhaps a compromise can be reached: require authenticators but give the player the right to waive it. The terms of the waiver, however, would mean you accept the consequences if your account is broken into (i.e. no restore or something along those lines).
johnthediver Jan 8th 2010 11:41AM
Really? It is a chore? To add an extra layer of security? 6 extra charters when logging in? (Maybe 8 with newer/iPhone version). I got mine as soon as they were available. The $6 and extra login entry is well worth the peace of mind that my account is a little more difficult to hack.
PocketFox Jan 8th 2010 11:43AM
Really? Your account isn't worth the extra 5 seconds of time it takes to put the code in? Or you're just that convinced of your own security?
XielianPally Jan 9th 2010 11:48AM
Fine, Then you dont get to have you account restored if something happens. They gave you an option to protect your account, and you turned it down. Therefore, you accept full responsibility for what happens to your account.
deweymaverick Jan 8th 2010 11:54AM
Really to beat a dead horse... you consider staring a little screen pushing a little button in a game where you stare at a big screen and push big buttons for hours on end a chore?
Do you really not see the irony in that?
Really?
Jasperwind Jan 8th 2010 12:00PM
First off, it is a "chore" for the first week or so. After that it is second nature and only takes 3 seconds longer.
Second, please learn the difference between "then" and "than."
pot Jan 8th 2010 1:03PM
@Raaj
That is not true at all. I recently had an account problem with EQ2 and they rolled back my character to a time period in Febuary 2008. Don't generalize about EQ2 when you don't know what their policies are.
orlochavez Jan 8th 2010 2:02PM
Is it your fault for getting your house broken into if you don't have armed guards at every entrance?
Is it your fault for getting your car stolen if it wasn't locked in a steel plated garage?
Is it your fault for getting your child kidnapped if he/she didn't have a personal bodyguard?
Plenty of people that get hacked aren't doing anything reckless with the internet usage that would result in getting keylogged. Hackers can pull your information from your computer using Ventrilo (by getting your IP, then doing some other stuff - I forget the specifics). So are you "stupid" if you use Vent? As one person already stated, the people claiming that those getting hacked are "stupid" are grossly underestimating the resourcefulness and intelligence of those doing the hacking.
Sure, getting an authenticator is a smart and relatively easy security measure (at least easier than bodyguards for the kids), but it's still an extra security measure that Blizzard is requiring us to pay for if we want complete security from being hacked. It should be something offered for free on more than just mobile phone downloads.
Hoggersbud Jan 8th 2010 3:51PM
>Is it your fault for getting your house broken into if you don't have armed guards at every entrance?<
Is it the White House? Then yes, it probably would be. Ask the head of the Secret Service.
>Is it your fault for getting your car stolen if it wasn't locked in a steel plated garage?<
Is your car the Batmobile? Then yes, it probably would be. Ask Bruce Wayne.
>Is it your fault for getting your child kidnapped if he/she didn't have a personal bodyguard?<
Ask President Obama.
What my examples are preposterous? So are yours.