You left off "and do less damage than every single other melee class, and tons less than any ranged".

Apparently warriors' biggest problem is that we don't QQ loud enough.

1. Certain other classes are overpowered, people QQ, nothing happens.
2. Warriors finally come into parity, other classes QQ loudly, warriors get nerfed back into PvP oblivion.

These are the kind of comments that get uprated? Good god.

Warriors have been, are, and will be good at pvp for much of the forseeable future. Prot is not a messiah coming down from on high and pulling warriors out the the pit of pvp crappiness. Arms has been viable for a while now, maybe YOU suck at it, but that's another issue.

Why do I even post? I'm starting to think 90% of the people who read WoW.com know nothing about pvp at all, but still feel the need to post garbage like "OMG, wars aren't viable!"

*copied and pasted because I wasn't smart enough to hit reply the first time, in case you see this again later on in the comments*

Thanks for that lemons, I don't even see why that could've been downrated by anything but a warrior who has no better way to QQ about the nerf stick. Blizzard is nerfing their ability to break snares because of exactly what I described. If it wasn't true, why would Warriors be losing the ability? Learn to think before you downrate? I mean definitely warriors MUST do less than other malee, and tons less than ranged...because suddenly ranged damage is the only real damage, if it always passes malee, period. Rogues are a joke, amirite? Never heard of an enhancement shammy in arenas, that's for sure...

Also, let's say that by some chance, there was never any warrior[s] capable of QQing loud enough (which I highly doubt that's true, few people aren't good at QQing).

Obviously, if there aren't enough warriors QQing about it, it's not that big of a deal. Now is it? Obviously, if every single other class IS QQing loud enough about it, something is up with warriors being impossible to snare. Isn't it? Hence...the nerf.