Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-13-2010 @ 10:14AM
Arodiel said...
Well, I hadn't thought it through *terribly* hard (I'm not very maths-y heh), but I was thinking of *very* broad lines (so not just cookiecutter, @Dere). It could be related to all sorts of things, not just spec. A tank spec does not a tank make, after all. To use the Pala example from TheMad...OK, you had ret spec, but I'm presuming you used tanking gear. There's got to be a way to figure out which gear/stat/spec combinations are totally unworkable for a particular role.
If it means ruling out a few of the more unusual builds, then I think it's worth it. If you tank yourself you may not be aware of just how truly awful the tanking in LFG is most of the time. Even a slight mitigation of this would be incredibly welcome for me. And in the end, we'd only be talking about the *random LFG* groups. People could still do whatever they like with guildies or non-randoms.