Bobby Kotick didn't think Blizzard was worth $7 million in '96

The Escapist clued us in to this little story: back in 1995, Kotick was eating lunch with some folks from Davidson & Associates, and they told him that they had just bought up-and-coming software developer Blizzard Entertainment for the tidy sum of seven million dollars -- a number that a baffled Kotick believed to be ridiculous. At the time, Blizzard's claim to fame was Warcraft: Orcs vs. Humans, and ... that's pretty much it, save for a few one-off games like Blackthorne and The Lost Vikings. Kotick called them nothing more than a "contract developer" and remarked that they weren't worth seven million bucks.
Of course, later that year, Blizzard released Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness, which catapulted them into gaming history forever. Thirteen years later, in 2008, Kotick (and Activision) paid seven billion dollars to acquire Blizzard. For those not into mathematics, that's one thousand times more than what Davidson & Associates paid.
Well, he was right about one thing. They definitely weren't worth seven million bucks. He just didn't know how right he was at the time.
Filed under: News items, Interviews
Patch 5.4 patch notes
Virtual Realms feature revealed
The Proving Grounds are coming
The latest patch 5.4 news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 4)
Drakkenfyre Jan 21st 2010 8:51PM
Apogee had nothing to do with Wolfenstein 3D outside of publishing it. id Sofware wrote it.
Also, Apogee no longer exists except in name alone. In fact, the current owners of the trademark are going to bring it back to use in pc games.
Cephas Jan 21st 2010 8:42PM
He was right! We're talking about Blizzard minus Starcraft minus Diablo minus all of Warcraft except the first one. I mean the first Warcraft did pretty well, but there was hardly any guarantee that they would ever make anything that commercially successful ever again!
Al Jan 21st 2010 11:31PM
Battle-Chess, Lost Vikings, Rock and Roll Racing. They didn't just spring up with Warcraft overnight.
Cephas Jan 21st 2010 11:56PM
I wasn't claiming that they just popped out of nowhere with a hit game, my point was that after one hit they easily could have faded into obscurity with increasingly poorer games (Sonic series, anybody?). And if you were trying to say that Battle-Chess, Lost Vikings, or Rock and Roll Racing were hits, you're wrong. They actually were pretty good games, but they were far from commercially successful.
Al Jan 22nd 2010 12:58AM
By 1993 standards they actually were successful, hence the sequels. They never reached Warcraft's level of recognition, but then Warcraft was in a much smaller playing field. They were lucky enough to be the first Dune 2 clone released, and lucky again that all the others followed Dune 2's sci-fi line.
Tyr Jan 21st 2010 8:47PM
Stories like this are very prevalent because no-one can accurately predict the future with a 100% success rate. Most of these stories are just about a gut feeling gone wrong or a lack of a gut feeling.
In the Escapist article it says: "...The businessman in Kotick was, frankly, baffled: "That year Activision probably had 60 million in revenues..."
So at the time, Kotick probably made a good call. It could have gone the other way, leading to a 7 million dollar moneysink. There's easily more stories about (relatively) expensive deals gone completely wrong.
Cyanea Jan 21st 2010 10:21PM
Plus...imagine what would've happened to Blizzard had Activision taken control that early in their history before they had developed the clout and reputation to run their studios their own way (like now).
Kroax Jan 21st 2010 8:55PM
Check here for the original news post: http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2010/01/18/news-Kotick_3A00_-Activision-Could-Have-Bought-Blizzard-For-_2400_7-Million.aspx
One quote from Mr. Kotick strikes me:
"I was talking to [Blizzard founder] Mike Morhaime the other day and I said, 'You know, I could have bought you for seven million and instead it was seven billion.' [Laughs]
He said, 'Yeah, could you imagine if I had just held out for the seven billion instead of the seven million?'”
Drakkenfyre Jan 21st 2010 8:52PM
Software*
Here,
http://www.idsoftware.com/games/wolfenstein/wolf3d/
Drakkenfyre Jan 21st 2010 8:54PM
Arrg, fail reply.
So, going to make the best of it and say this. If Bobby Kotick had bought the company back then, it wouldn't be worth shit now, and we wouldn't have the games we have now. He cares not for the games, only for the money. And he would have most likely would have sacked everyone at the company long time ago.
Aarnando Jan 21st 2010 9:09PM
Just to clarify, Kotick was not passing up the oppurtunity to purchase Blizzard for 7 milion, but only commenting that paying that much seemed insane to him. Whoever he was talking to was telling him about their purchase, not offering him the oppurtunity to purchase.
Having said that, it's obvious in hindsight that his incredulity was misplaced, but I probably would have been skeptical of the deal too.
Drakkenfyre Jan 21st 2010 9:22PM
I know, I read the story when it originally appeared on Joystiq, if I remember correctly the discussion about whether or not if he bought the company came up.
Sleutel Jan 21st 2010 9:12PM
Man Makes Reasonable Prediction Based on Available Information, Later Turns Out to Be Wrong! Film at 11!
Adeany Jan 21st 2010 9:16PM
I would watch that film just to see Kotick be wrong.
Lucidien Jan 21st 2010 9:41PM
Only one name for such a movie could be appropriate:
"Wrong Kotick is Wrong."
JokerFace Jan 21st 2010 11:28PM
Fanboys don't understand they are being made fun of via a George Carlin style joke that makes fun of headlines! Film at 11!
Go read "Napalm and Silly Putty".
Mognet T Jan 21st 2010 10:05PM
To be fair, Blizzard wasn't really worth 7 mil in 1996. How would he, or anyone else for that matter, envision how far the company would go? Before anyone jumps down my throat, I hate Kotick as much as the next guy, but his response seems quite smart for someone in '96.
ben Jan 21st 2010 10:11PM
John Funk made the article, so it's more Warcry than it is The Escapist.
But that's kinda like saying Susan Arendt is more Lolcats than The Escapist ;p
(wow, I spend waaaay too much time on the escapist. Check out Ben's WTF! files if you like the escapist.)
-benbenthegamerman
Kilseker Jan 21st 2010 10:32PM
Pwned. Nuff said.
jenlosi Jan 21st 2010 10:55PM
Activision didn't spend a penny on Blizzard -- Vivendi acquired Activision.