Arcane Brilliance: The state of the mage, volume 4 of 72

First of all, you might be wondering why only 72 volumes. I'll be honest: it has to do with the great zombie apocalypse of 2037. I don't want to give too much away, but let's just say it severely impairs my ability to write. To be frank, the last 15 parts are pretty much just "braiiinns...warlocks....suuuuck...brains...braiiiins..." repeated over and over for a thousand words or so. After that, my zombie-self just loses interest. Some of you may wonder how those columns will be any different from the ones I write now. To you, I say bite me.
I've extolled upon the state of mages on three previous occasions. It's actually interesting to go back and look over those ancient texts from our current perspective. Oh, the silly things we were worried about back then! Fire PvP... ha! Spirit, less than useful? What a ridiculous concern! Oh... how far we've come.
Ignore my sarcasm. I'm not actually unhappy at all with the current state of mages. We are, as I stated in the opening blurb, awesome. Join me after the break and we'll look at where we are as a class in 2010.
2010 ushers in a fun era. Patch 3.3 puts us at the tail end of the Wrath of the Lich King content. There may yet be another patch before Cataclysm hits, but my guess is that it won't be a major content patch, and will more likely be the big pre-expansion patch, priming the world for the coming revamp. I don't anticipate another Sunwell-type patch, like we got at the end of Burning Crusade. Blizzard claims that toppling the Lich King is the capper for this go-round, and I believe them.
So what we see now, largely, is what we'll be getting for the rest of this version of WoW. We are who we're going to be as a class until Cataclysm reboots everything again. And for the first time I can recall in my career as a mage, I'm okay with that.
Arcane
Last week I wrote a basic primer on this tree that enumerates a lot of the strengths and weaknesses of the spec. In short, Arcane is our current top-dog raiding spec. Glance around your guild. How many arcane mages are there in your regular group? My guess is that your answer is "a buttload." Compare that number to the number of fire, frostfire, and frost mages, and I expect you'll find something of a disparity. Arcane, for so many years the black sheep of the mage family, is now the favored son, gets the best seat at the supper table, is the quarterback of the football team, and gets to take Jaina to the prom.
When properly specced and outfitted, an arcane mage has the highest potential pure DPS capability of the four major mage specs. Sustained damage output is high, ranking at or near the top of the DPS class hierarchy in most encounters. The Arcane Blastx4/Missile Barrage+Arcane Missiles rotation is incredibly powerful, and doesn't cause the mana efficiency issues arcane used to suffer from.
Arcane's problems lie in a different aspect of the game. At the beginning of this expansion, the brute force of pre-nerf Arcane Barrage made arcane an intriguing PvP option. The spec was mobile, slippery, and capable of strong bursts of damage. Now that Arcane Barrage isn't the weapon it once was, arcane simply isn't a viable option at the upper echelons of Arena combat. Burst damage isn't high enough to burn high level opponents down with the speed necessary to compete.
Things I'd like to see happen for arcane:
- A buff to Arcane Barrage. The spell was nerfed to limit its effectiveness in PvP, but what's happened is that it's become an impotent spell in both PvE and PvP content. It needs to have its base damage increased a bit, and it needs to proc Missile Barrage with the same frequency as Arcane Blast.
- The talent tree itself is still a bit bloated. I'd like to see talents like Arcane Stability or Arcane Concentration reduced to 3 talent points instead of 5. I'm not pretending to understand class design, but 81 talent points in the arcane tree, compared to 73 in fire and 74 in frost just seems excessive. It takes too large an investment in the tree to get all of the valuable PvE talents, and this is an issue that should change.
For a patch or two, deep fire was the ringleader of the mage PvE specs, but has since fallen to a distant second, behind arcane. Living Bomb is still a potent weapon, far and away the most worthwhile of the three mage 51-point talents. The spec is still incredibly random-number-generator dependent, living and dying by crit frequency and proc timeliness. It's a fun, powerful-feeling spec, but can far too often become frustrating when a particular run of bad virtual dice-rolls sucks the potency out of your damage output through no fault of your own.
On the PvP side of things, fire is a jekyll-and-hyde operation. On one side of the coin, fire is less than useless in Arena combat. But bring a fire mage into a large battleground, and their incredible AoE capabilities are nothing short of devastating.
Things I'd like to see happen for fire:
- PvP survivability. I've been begging for this for as long as I can remember. My mom tells me that my first words were "Buff Molten Armor." Apparently my next utterance was "death to all warlocks." The nice lady at day care called the police when I tried to set fire to a stuffed sheep during play-time. It was scary then, but we laugh about it now.
- Lower dependency on RNG. In particular, Hot Streak. There are a lot of ways to fix this, but my personal favorite the concept of some sort of counter component. Instead of having to cross our fingers for two crits in a row, change the requirements to an internal counter. After a certain number of crits in a set amount of time, Hot Streak triggers. There are plenty of other potential solutions, but main goal here is to allow fire mages to have more predictable access to their most powerful damage potential.
Frost is and always has been the undisputed king of the PvP hill. A feared class in both Arena and large-scale PvP across the board, frost mages pack survivability and controllable burst damage into a deadly package.
The issue with frost has always been on the other side of the game. Recent changes have made frost somewhat competitive, but the spec is still largely shunned in the upper echelons of raid content, and for good reason. Frost still comes in a distant fourth to the other three major specs in terms of raw DPS output. Permanent Water Elementals and raid damage added to Deep Freeze have closed the gap significantly, but a chasm still exists.
The knock on buffing frost PvE viability has always been that it's the PvP tree, that making frost effective in raids would upset ever-precarious PvP balance, somehow making it too powerful. But recent developments--such as the Deep Freeze change (does damage, but only to raid bosses, and remains unchanged in PvP), and the general nerf to healing (but only in PvP situations)--have rendered that point moot.
I can understand Blizzard's hesitance to create too much separation between PvP and PvE in the way the classes operate, but these changes show that they're willing to make concessions when necessary. What's stopping them from taking the next step and balancing the few remaining "PvP-only" specs so that they function in both aspects of the game? Why can't frost be good at both PvP and PvE?
Things I'd like to see happen for frost:
- More PvE buffs. We're on the right track here. Buff Frostbolt's damage, but only in PvE. It's a simple fix that Blizzard has already set the precedent for. Is there anybody out there who wouldn't like to see frost become completely raid-viable? There are plenty of other ways to buff frost in PvE, but this is just the easiest one that comes to mind.
- I'd still like to see more interactivity added to this spec. Previous to the Deep Freeze change, the optimal frost spell rotation was Frostbolt spam. Now the rotation is Frostbolt spam, but cast Deep Freeze when it's off cooldown. Somehow, some way, I'd like to live in a world where there is a situation where an Ice Lance is a better option than a second Frostbolt when Fingers of Frost is up.
Frostfire is less of a major spec than an alternate playstyle. This is essentially a fire mage who has specced around using Frostfire Bolt as their main nuke instead of Fireball. At the start of Wrath, frostfire represented the highest possible DPS for mages, but the spec has since slipped below arcane and deep fire on the raiding mage ladder. The main reason for this, it seems to me, is that Blizzard has simply stopped paying attention to it.
I shouldn't complain. Most classes only have three specs. Mages have four viable ones. Sure, they're all just different skins on a DPS class, but there are four of them. Still, the concept of an elementalist mage was (and still is) so intriguing to me, I can't help but lament the lack of attention the build has gotten in recent patches. Blizzard introduced us to this spec with the advent of Frostfire Bolt in this expansion, and I'd like to see them turn the penetrating gaze of their omnipotent, lidless eye to it once more.
Things I'd like to see happen for frostfire:
- The only thing I can really think of here is also the simplest thing: buff Frostfire Bolt. The talents for the spec are already in place. The spell isn't really used by any other spec, so buffing it slightly wouldn't upset spec balance in any way that I can see. Just bump up the base damage of Frostfire a bit so that the spec can compete again on the damage meters.
Filed under: Mage, Analysis / Opinion, (Mage) Arcane Brilliance
Patch 5.4 patch notes
Virtual Realms feature revealed
The Proving Grounds are coming
The latest patch 5.4 news





Reader Comments (Page 5 of 5)
theatermusic87 Feb 9th 2010 11:33AM
My main pet peeve with mages (and it has been for a long time) is that we really only get one spell interupt... and it's on an ungodly long cool down... where as shaman get the joyous ability every few seconds and if memory serves they had (a while back) 2... earth shock and wind shear... both on relatively short cooldowns
a way to fix it might be to instead of adding silence through improved counter spell reduce the cool down by 50% for each rank. If it were one or the other it really wouldn't end up being a pvp nerf or buff (you just interupt more often instead of them not being able to do anything) and in PVE it would make us actually want to use it more often
Pianoforte Feb 9th 2010 12:14PM
For Frost, I think an easy fix would be to take Fingers of Frost and Frostbite off of the same mechanic. Basically, you can get FoF without Frostbite and vice versa. This way, you could have the +50% crit modifier in PvE far more often without having the up the likelihood of destroyi...I mean freezing Warlock in place in PvP. Make them separate procs, and up FoF's proc rate.
I totally agree that Arcane is bloated all to hell, too. I've been running as an Arcane mage since little Pianoforte was level 10 and I first learned that Hogger is a good for nothing, stun spamming, jerk and, while it's kinda cool to finally see my tree getting some Blizz-love, it also really sucks to see half of my tree grey when I hit 'N.'
I think Arcane Barrage and Frostfire Bolt share the same problem. Blizzard introduced to mages two spells with mind-blowing, Warlock-slaying, raid boss devastating numbers. Then they said "Crap, guess we made that way to strong...where'd I put my nerf hammer?..." Then they hit both spells over the head with a dose of useless and have since swept them under the rug.
I wasn't in favor of FFB from the moment it was announced, and I think my fears have come to fruition. Blizz gave mages a real all-or-nothing spell in FFB. It benefit from Frost's ridiculous crit dmg modifier, as well as Fire's crit chance boosts and Hot Streak. On the other hand, it receives double-dip resistance and, if you're interrupted while casting it, you lose BOTH schools for the duration. Seems like Blizzard has decided that this spell is just too dramatic and gave up on trying to balance it. They opened a can of worms with FFB and don't seem to be willing to fix it.
However, my one biggest gripe is that I never, ever, ever, ever get to use the best spell mages have ever had: Polymorph: Turtle. NEVER! No heroics or raids require consistent CC and the ones in which you would even consider it are full of nothing but unsheepable, unturleables. ='(...it makes my heart sad
Pianoforte Feb 9th 2010 12:45PM
OH yeah! One more thing...Why in the world doesn't the Arcane Tree have an "Improved Arcane Intellect" talent? I mean, seriously? Almost every other consistently used/needed buff (i.e.: NOT stuff like fear ward and fire resist aura. Stuff you actually have up all the time) has some kind of improvement talent. Imp Blessings, Imp Demon Armour, Commanding Prescence, Imp PW: Fortitude, etc. I mean, Warlocks even get an improvement to their Fel Candy!!!! What the deuce!?
Arohn Feb 9th 2010 4:45PM
There is something about FFB that's so intriguing. I think it's the fact that the bolt that comes from your hand looks bad ass. Screenshot is a testament to this.
As for future buffs to FFB... I think a faster cast time is all it needs to become somewhat more viable for end game content. The slow cast time is it's biggest issue.
I used to roll it in battlegrounds and it was so fun. It doesn't have the survivability that frost does, but there's something incredibly satisfying about hitting a massive shatter crit with berserker buff and arcane power active as FFB.
Spec was something like this - http://www.wowhead.com/?talent#obhibzrcdcGuMtxdZhIbco0h
Vyre Feb 9th 2010 9:00PM
When I used my elementalist way back when, I would gleefully alternate both Fire AND Frost spells. Dragon's Breath here, Frost Nova there, chill with CoC and hurt with Fire spells- with Frostfire bolt, I was given a main nuke, but I lost the magic of using two trees. The standard 0/51/18 build is deep fire with a new nuke. Living Bomb, Scorch, Pyroblast- 3 Fire spells and a half-fire spell. I don't think that's what a FROST/Fire build should feel like.
The way I see it, Frostfire can find a niche, but it needs to be designed from the top down as a dual spec, not a deep fire spec with a little frost topping. The way I see it, Frostfire Bolt should be the main nuke, but the rotation needs a little spin. Put FoF into the mix, and let us get some ice lances in there. Incentives to spend points in both trees equally and give it it's own identity- I'd love to see boatloads of ideas on the subject... I'm sure a lot of fun and functional ideas could come up. I'd love to see an article about it here, on my favorite internet column, for sure! =D
Kurki Feb 11th 2010 12:17AM
I'm not sure I understand where you're coming from when you write that you would like to see various spells from the frost / frostfire spec buffed so that they can be "more competitive" with the other specs when it comes to damage.
Why should the specs be competitive? They are different, that is the key. One has best single target damage, the other has best AoE damage, and the other two rely on control (snares and roots). It all depends on your goals and how you like to play. To make ALL the specs competitive with each other in damage seems to be missing the point of having different specs that do different things in the first place.
Sporkcheeto May 17th 2010 12:02AM
This is the first time i've read Arcane Brilliance, and i have to say i believe alot of what hees saying. being an 80 mage that mostly does pve, i really would like to see frostfire buffed like it was in the beginning of wotlk. and instead of seeing frost pve buffed, id like to see frost barrier buffed to take more damage. Also i can remember doing bg's as a 70 mage when arcane barrage was released but when i got to 80 it just didnt pack the same old punch it used to. point being, i would like to see a damage buff on both frostfire bolt and arcane barage, and a little bit more survivablility on frost pvp