Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-24-2010 @ 10:05PM
Moyanna said...
@Dave
The gun slot doesn't provide lots of effective health and pala's come out better on top regardless because it scales better rather than a fixed ammount thats dependant on one drop.
lets take an abitary ammount of stam a icc tank may have without the best in slot tanking rifle atm, 3200 stam for the pala
Pala 3200 + (3200*14%) = 3648 total stam for the pala
Warrior base 3200 stam + 77 for the rifle, so 3277 + (3277*6%) = 3473.62
or post fix 3277 + (3277*9%) = 3571.93
Sooo... buff long due but still not as much as the pala's advatange in the effective health arena
Reply
2-25-2010 @ 4:46AM
Ezence said...
That would make perfect sense but last patch Paladins had Sacred Duty (hidden nerf) scaled down to better balance us with other tanks. Tinkering a warriors tree and increasing their stamina % is just insulting.
2-25-2010 @ 12:44PM
Moyanna said...
@Ezence
Ok lets account for that "hidden" nerf the combination of talent buffs reduces it to a 12.5% increase for pala's Soo
Pala 3200 + (3200*12.5%) = 3600 total stam for the pala
down from the original 3648
compared to the post buff warrior with the 77 stam rifle with stam of 3571.93
Soo its gone from a 5% difference in hp between the two classes pre sacred duty nerf and vitality buff to 0.8% difference but with the pala's still coming out on top