Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-03-2010 @ 9:47AM
Blacksheep said...
You guys usually do an amazing job here, I love your posts and having been a journalist in the past, I understand editor's orders about doing stories, however, these stat posts are simply rehash after rehash after rehash. I read about these stat changes in your original Cataclysm post several days ago, then I read about them for hunters, then DK tanks then DK DPS and so on, all containing the exact same data as the original post. This isn't necessary, the information is being over duplicated, perhaps just posting up a recap on Cataclysm now and then with the overarching post on stat changes would suffice?
Reply
3-03-2010 @ 9:51AM
Keith said...
The multiple articles exist so that someone searching for "cataclysm stat chances dps death knight" finds wow.com instead of another site. There's absolutely nothing forcing you to read every single one, or to waste even more time complaining about it.
3-03-2010 @ 10:05AM
Rob said...
Isn't that what keywords are for? Anyway, to each there own, but we dont really need 30 articles saying the exact same thing, based on a single blue post ,none the less.
3-03-2010 @ 10:07AM
Chilblain said...
They must get paid by the article.
3-03-2010 @ 11:21AM
Gaea said...
Since I don't read the whole Blue posts as I'm not interested in, let's say a tanking spec DK. I like wow.com breaking it out into bit sized chunks that apply to me.
Just my 2 cents...