Know Your Lore: Lore 101, Part 2, Page 3

Another way this alteration can be performed is by rewriting historical facts and stating the world has always been this way. The biggest example of this is the origins of the draenei: in the original history of the world, as documented by the book 'Sargeras and the Betrayal,' the following is stated:
During the development of TBC, when the Draenei were announced as the new Alliance race, the following was published on the official Burning Crusade website:The eredar, an insidious race of devilish sorcerers, used their warlock magics to invade and enslave a number of worlds. The indigenous races of those worlds were mutated by the eredar's malevolent powers and turned into demons themselves. Though Sargeras' nearly limitless powers were more than enough to defeat the vile eredar, he was greatly troubled by the creatures' corruption and all-consuming evil. Incapable of fathoming such depravity, the great Titan began to slip into a brooding depression. Despite his growing unease, Sargeras rid the universe of the warlocks by trapping them within a corner of the Twisting Nether.
This created an absolute uproar, as it appeared that Metzen himself had forgotten the origins of the world he created, an impression that was verified by Metzen's apology regarding the matter:Nearly twenty-five thousand years ago, the eredar race arose on the world of Argus. They were extremely intelligent and had a natural affinity for magic in all its myriad forms. Using their gifts, they developed a vast and wondrous society. Unfortunately the eredar's accomplishments caught the attention of Sargeras, the Destroyer of Worlds. He had already begun his Burning Crusade to eradicate all life from the cosmos, and he believed that the brilliant eredar would be pivotal in leading the vast demonic army he was gathering. Thus, he contacted the eredar's three most prominent leaders: Kil'jaeden, Archimonde, and Velen. In exchange for the loyalty of the eredar race, Sargeras offered untold power and knowledge.
Right... To be totally up-front with you guys, it's my bad, straight up. The obvious lore contradiction with Sargeras and his encounter with the eredar was clearly documented in the Warcraft III manual. I wrote those bits about four years ago, and to be totally honest, I simply forgot. Genius, right? With my excitement to get the draenei up to speed and root them more firmly in the setting, I forgot to do my homework and go back over my earlier writing. I can assure you, no one's more crushed about this mistake than I am. I've spent the last few days kicking my own ass over this one. Sucks to fail. It may not always be evident, but we take this story stuff really seriously at Blizzard. It's been one of my personal missions at this company to maintain a high level of integrity throughout the Warcraft game setting (all of them, actually) and I think we've done a pretty decent job of upholding the continuity over the years.

Players were understandably angry about the change, and upset that Metzen could've simply 'forgotten' something so important -- but what you have to keep in mind is that Metzen has an incredibly vast story he's developed, with a huge cast of characters. As an author, when working on a story you're not only keeping track of the characters that exist and the events that have been written (and by the time TBC came out, there were a lot of events), but characters and storylines that have yet to be. What seems obvious to the reader is something that clearly can slip the author's mind in between everything else they are keeping track of. Metzen did the only thing he could do; apologize for the oversight and explain that yes, the events in Burning Crusade are the factual events that actually happened.
While this is an alteration made by rewriting historical facts, it can actually be filed under 'expanding existing history' by looking at it from another perspective. While the denizens of Azeroth were under one impression that historians noted and documented in books like Sargeras and the Betrayal, at the time those books were written, they had no idea the draenei even existed, save for the few mutated, largely insane Lost Ones that roamed the Swamp of Sorrows and the Blasted Lands. Upon actually meeting the draenei, it was obvious that the historians simply got their facts wrong -- easy to do when you weren't actually there.
I'm going to evoke Godwin's Law here and make an analogy: it could be looked at as having history books that stated that the actions against the Jewish people during the Holocaust were warranted, and the Jewish people being presented as being somehow wrong or evil, forcing Hitler to take the actions he took during the course of World War II. Then suddenly, a large group of survivors from the concentration camps are introduced who are not only not evil, but have a very, very different story regarding the events that took place. Considering all you had to work with at first were stories written down by historians that weren't even present when those events happened, you cannot really argue the events of history with people that were actually there when those events took place.

With canon being so iffy, timeline shifts negating current lore, retcons happening periodically and entire previous parts of history being rewritten all the time, what's a lore researcher supposed to do? Well, you can either throw up your hands and say 'to hell with it,' which is no fun at all, or you can simply enjoy the story as it's being written, without getting too attached to events or characters in the way they've been presented.
The passion behind the reactions to timeline shifts and continuity changes is a testament to exactly how convoluted and entertaining the Warcraft story is; and while at times it seems like the story can get out of control, it's obvious from fan reactions that the story behind Warcraft is a good one. People like myself that document lore have to keep in mind everything that's been presented above, and documenting events and history according to lore is a lot more difficult than most people realize. The most important thing for beginners in lore research to remember is this: when it comes to Warcraft history, the best weapon a lore hound can have is an open mind.
Stay tuned for next time, when I talk about speculation, theory, and fanfiction!






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
guydebord Mar 22nd 2010 5:42PM
There is a book called "Third Person" which is a fantastic collection of essays, interviews and research papers on the complexities of these vast narrative universes like WoW that we're seeing more and more in popular culture. The different essays in the book are hit or miss, but there are some real gems from both people that have worked on large narrative projects and also from scholars. Check it out! http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11757
Elmo Mar 22nd 2010 4:15PM
We once killed the Lich King and since we had some time left we went for ToGC, so by the time we killed the Twin Valkyr the Lich King appeared...
of course everyone knew that was going to happen but it was funny still.
"so it took less than an hour for Bolvar to become corrupted!"
Terethall Mar 22nd 2010 6:47PM
I can only imagine how pissed Tirion would be.
mindflayer Mar 22nd 2010 4:20PM
Your evocation of Godwin's Law is appropriate here. It provided a solid grounding for your argument for retconning content.
EtaoinShrdlu Mar 22nd 2010 5:00PM
Agreed, though I'd say the popular image of gypsies is a better match (mystical wandering people with unusual accents.and skin colors) while still being equally applicable.
Ringo Flinthammer Mar 22nd 2010 4:29PM
Varian in Dustwallow (and the Alliance quests discussing the kidnapping of the king) actually make perfect sense with the comic. In the comic, he has a great deal of lost time -- part of which can easily be him cooling his heels in a dungeon guarded by naga. The Lost Diplomat storyline was about discovering that the Defias (under orders from someone later revealed to be Onyxia) had kidnapped Varian Wrynn.
I haven't read anything other than the first collection of Warcraft comics yet -- the stilted writing was just too painful -- but my understanding from wowwiki is that pretty much matches what the comics spelled out anyway.
Danghor Mar 26th 2010 11:29AM
I just actually completed that questline while working on Loremaster, and they changed it so now Jaina explains what's going on. Her full quote:
"Perhaps I should explain... I had arranged for a secret summit between Warchief Thrall and King Wrynn, here in Theramore. The king was to travel here by ship, in secret. But the ship never arrived, and King Wrynn disappeared. Your help enabled us to connect the Defias to the mastermind behind the abduction, Onyxia, who was posing as a member of the royal court. Meanwhile, the king managed to escape his captors, and returned to Stormwind to deal with Onyxia. I will send word that you have discovered the link to the Defias. I was a fool to think them broken with the defeat of Edwin Van Cleef, and King Wrynn will want to make an example of all who remain."
Brodi Mar 22nd 2010 4:31PM
I recognize that first image... where is it from...?
vinniedcleaner Mar 22nd 2010 4:36PM
I'm guessing that's a comic about Rhonin traveling back in time in the novel Well of Eternity and meeting Malfurion and Tyrande
Daethar Mar 23rd 2010 11:56AM
Yes but where is the source? I'd like to know who drew that, and if there is more to it than the single frame
vinniedcleaner Mar 22nd 2010 4:31PM
"Uh, yeah, well, whenever you notice something like that... a wizard did it."
Catacomb Kid Mar 22nd 2010 4:37PM
Oh, Lucy. You're so Lawless..
loreaddict Mar 22nd 2010 8:13PM
Actually, when I find inconsistencies in the lore I attribute it to unreliable narrator, propaganda machine or simple misinformation. Think about it, if the Titans created the world first, and later the Old Gods took over, if i was C'thun, i would simply tell my subjects that I was their almighty creator, for added leverage. If the Eredar were really an original race of evil omnicidial maniacs, if i was the Velen, i would do everything everything in my power to cover our dark past. My point being that there is always room for interpretation.
Derrek Mar 22nd 2010 10:13PM
But I thought Azeroth already existed, then the Titans kinda stumbled into it, didn't like what they saw, reshaped the planet and imprisoned the Old "gods", created the Dragonflights to watch over it, and wandered off into the multiverse.
Two different accounts from different historians, that's all.
Off topic, why is the Draenei in the picture red? The corrupted Eredar are red from demonic taint, but no player models I've seen are red and no Eredar I've seen use that model. Was that a BC beta model, or...?
Alchemistmerlin Mar 22nd 2010 4:34PM
"And that's perfectly ok"
No, stop telling people that sloppy writing, bad world building, and a poor attention to detail is fine.
Cataca Mar 22nd 2010 5:39PM
Yeah, it's not Terry Pratchett's Discworld but it does have some merit.
I wont argue that there aren't many...well awful points and reused plots, but it has kept my attention well enough so I wouldn't dismiss it so easily.
Alchemistmerlin Mar 22nd 2010 5:42PM
"He's said something negative about blizzard! Quickly, downrate him!"
Anathemys Mar 22nd 2010 6:16PM
Lets say you have to remember the complete biography, personality, and thoughts of every person that lives or ever did live, AND you have to know the complete biography, personality, and thoughts of every person that WILL live.
Blizzard has to do a slightly smaller version of this, but with the geography, governments, nations and cultures of Azeroth as well.
And also remember that a lot of people have trouble remembering to zip up their jeans...
TR Mar 22nd 2010 6:53PM
It's a lost cause. It's one thing to speculate about alternate timelines, multiverses, etc. but it even the Chris Metzen quote showed there was a lack of planning involved. The gist of what I got is pay attention to lore, but it will invalidate itself somewhere down the line, so don't pay that much attention to it. Might as well do away with quest text then. :(
If any TV show did something like that without at least attempting to tie up loose threads, its ratings, viewers would lose interest, it would drop like a stone and get cancelled.
scalien Mar 22nd 2010 8:16PM
Bad worldbuilding? Sure, there are retcons... but aside from that how is the universe of WOW an example of bad worldbuilding?
Or are you going to hang your hat one the existence of retcons and a few things your personally dislike?
Maybe, just maybe is you explained your position a little instead of just spewing words like 'bad worldbulding' you would not be down rated so quickly.