Activision quietly restructures senior management

Why these changes weren't relayed to investors or the press is still unknown, but it's likely due to the fact that they could be interpreted as a sign of weakness. Activision has seen flagging sales for two of its former cash-cow franchises, Tony Hawk and Guitar Hero, and a recent very public scuffle with Call of Duty creators Jason West and Vince Zampanella following their ejection from their positions as heads of Activision's Infinity Ward studio painted the studio in a negative light with gamers. This kind of restructuring could point to turmoil within the company, an image that an industry juggernaut like Activision would want to avoid.
So, what do these changes mean for Blizzard, and for World of Warcraft? Activision got a hold of us to say "nothing at all" -- the restructuring was for Activision's side of the business only. It's important to remember that Activision-Blizzard is an umbrella company that contains two separate divisions: Activision Publishing and Blizzard Entertainment. Activision restructured into three different units, but Blizzard remains independent.
Filed under: Blizzard, News items






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Dreamstorm Mar 30th 2010 8:08PM
Ban-hammer, incoming!
DUCK!
Too late...
Twilit Soul Mar 30th 2010 8:09PM
Baka.
Magma Mar 30th 2010 8:09PM
And thank god for that
Chilblain Mar 30th 2010 8:14PM
Call of Duty needs its own unit?
"Okay guys, what country haven't we shot up yet?"
Phaelan Mar 30th 2010 8:24PM
Call of Duty: The Stone Ages- In a time out of place, you and your group of spear wielding tribes man must fight off other tribes in lush forests, but watch out for roaming Saber-tooth Tigers.
Chris M Mar 30th 2010 8:54PM
Ramirez! Go defuse that rock with another rock!
Superthrust Mar 30th 2010 9:02PM
China...
Or france...oh wait...
Greg Mar 31st 2010 6:31AM
What country haven't we shot up yet? Two words:
Aliens dude.
Funny thing is, I bet someone there actually pitched the idea. And to the guy who said 'baka'. I can make up words too.
Festizio-na.
If you don't get the joke, rate down immediately.
Zhiva Mar 30th 2010 8:15PM
Did they kick Kotick out yet?
Lucera Mar 30th 2010 8:23PM
Well, the seal hunts did just start... oh wait. Wrong Kotick!
Superthrust Mar 30th 2010 9:04PM
I dont care when, how or why, but Kotick needs to go away. Prison, die, diabetic coma, something....
Honestly, its to the point where he is starting to affect other good game companies and their "good business ideas" with his blasphoemy.
At this point, I don't care if it means no more wow, or no more CoD or something, or at least a time where major decisions would be made, as long as he goes away.
Someone, pray to all the gods...Odin, jesus, RaptorJesus...someone/something...Call in all your favors.
JC_Icefox Mar 30th 2010 8:20PM
If I could punch you with my mind, I would.
On-Topic: My immediate thought upon reading the title was 'Uh-Oh, somebodies are gettin' canned.
I guess that might not be the case. I can understand why they might want to fracture the company in such a way as well. If they place each franchise/department on it's own pedestal, it allows them to make better decisions as to where money and manhours ought to be directed.
As many can tell by now, such things such as Guitar Hero and so on have pretty much been milked to their maximum usage. Meanwhile, CoD is a good example of a franchise that is still going strong. Filtering resources from the floundering group to the money-makers is a logically sound business move.
However, trying to be sneaky and not making this move openly clear to investors feels very tacky.
Task Mar 30th 2010 8:23PM
Activision had it coming to them about CoD, and they've folded because they don't like losing us (gamers). Good on [formerly I think?] Infinity for standing up to them.
Greyhame Mar 30th 2010 10:11PM
Activision and Blizzard Entertainment never really joined. Blizzard's owner's merged, and there's not much that Blizzard can do about that unless Activision Blizzard decides to sell them.
Greyhame Mar 30th 2010 10:11PM
*sigh* This should be a reply to the one below this.
Jack Mar 30th 2010 8:35PM
Activision and Blizzard need split up again! Activision is noting but bad news and does not help Blizzard out at all! Blizzard is the reason they still are there in the first place!
Artificial Mar 31st 2010 12:43AM
Are you saying Blizzard needs help? If not, then your complaint makes no sense. If so, then, what kind of assistance to they need that they're not getting?
nwoods13 Mar 30th 2010 8:40PM
sorry to point it out but right after the merged with vivendi link theres a typo. it says "to created" =D
Craig R Mar 30th 2010 9:13PM
"The company has apparently split itself into four units, one focused on the military game Call of Duty, another handling internally owned properties like Guitar Hero and the Tony Hawk series, and a third handling licensed properties."
I'm no mathamagician, but....
BP Mar 30th 2010 9:39PM
"I'm no mathamagician, but...."
Not a readamagician either, I guess - "...Activision states that the fourth unit, Blizzard Entertainment, remains an independent unit..."
Gotta admit it's all the way at the end of the article though.