Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-07-2010 @ 5:55PM
alastairduffield said...
Well if i'm honest one of the reasons i went enhance (apart from loving nothing more than running up to something and hitting it) was due to the complexity and challenge it offered to play well. I'm just not too sure how comfortable i am with the idea of dumbing it down but as with everything we'll have to wait and see
Reply
4-12-2010 @ 7:08PM
Greeni said...
"dumbing it down"? *trys not to type hate text*
ok, the longer cooldown on LL means more spells to mix into your rotation, meaning it's more complex. if Blizz wanted to dumb shams down, they would only have enh shams with two or three attacks, instead of the shocks, the Maelstrom Weapon-proc LBs, along with SS and LL. i personally think this makes it harder for 'noobs' to play enh shams (as if they weren't already picking failadins 57.5% of the time)