Drama Mamas: Invasion of privacy

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

4-16-2010 @ 7:11PM

uncaringbear said...

1. The writer makes no mention at all if any inappropriate or unfair loot distribution took place.

2. The orientation of the couple's relationship is irrelevant. Any two people who are in a relationship deserves privacy.

I laud the advice from Robin and Lisa, but it could've been summed up as as this:

If you think the guild requires a non-relationship rule for officers or loot council, then make a case to the guild leadership. You can do this WITHOUT revealing any relationships.

If the loot distribution has been fair thus far, then STFU. I'm guessing the writer lost out on a piece of loot that he REALLY felt he was entitled to.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.