Blizzard bans 320,000 WarCraft III and Diablo II players

For those of you who have had past experience with Battle.net, these numbers probably don't surprise you. The network has had a long reputation of being fairly easy on people using hacks as Blizzard tends to save up over a long period of time in order to do a massive batch of bans at once. This means that those who are using hacks have a long period of time to abuse the system before anything is done about it. The hacks for some games were rampant enough that other players began using hacks that detect other hacks. Regardless of the reason behind using a hack, it is still against the terms of service and means if you get caught, you're out.
Users with no prior record were given a 30-day ban from the service while repeat offenders felt the full force of the banhammer. Those bad boys with a previous record were given a permanent ban against their CD key, though not necessarily their Battle.net account. All of these punishments are final, as there isn't any real appeal process.
BashiokWe've recently banned over 320,000 Warcraft III and Diablo II accounts that were found to be violating the Battle.net Terms of Use. If this is a first offense, the CD key associated with the banned account will be suspended for 30 days, while repeat offenders will see their keys banned permanently. All account ban decisions are final.
We would like all players to remember that abuse of unintended mechanics and/or use of third party programs is a violation of the agreement made when signing on to Battle.net, and can subject your account to disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban of its access to the service. These types of activities can severely impact the stability of our servers, and we'll continue to aggressively monitor Battle.net in order to protect the service and its players from the harmful effects of cheating.
Many account closures come as the direct result of tips emailed to our hacks team by legitimate Battle.net users. If you come across a hack, find a site responsible for distributing hacks, or have a replay of a newly available hack, please report this to our hacks team at hacks@blizzard.com or through our Hacks Report Form at http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en_US&tag=hacksform
As always, thank you for your continued support, and we'll see you on Battle.net!
We would like all players to remember that abuse of unintended mechanics and/or use of third party programs is a violation of the agreement made when signing on to Battle.net, and can subject your account to disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban of its access to the service. These types of activities can severely impact the stability of our servers, and we'll continue to aggressively monitor Battle.net in order to protect the service and its players from the harmful effects of cheating.
Many account closures come as the direct result of tips emailed to our hacks team by legitimate Battle.net users. If you come across a hack, find a site responsible for distributing hacks, or have a replay of a newly available hack, please report this to our hacks team at hacks@blizzard.com or through our Hacks Report Form at http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en_US&tag=hacksform
As always, thank you for your continued support, and we'll see you on Battle.net!
Filed under: Cheats, Blizzard, News items, Account Security
Transmog yourself into an Avenger!
6 blue posts to read before Diablo 3's launch
Cross-realm zones coming soon
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Tripike Apr 21st 2010 1:04PM
Just play Pokemon instead! XD
Eternauta Apr 21st 2010 2:24PM
Pokemon = BM Hunters in Cata (their new pet storage system reminds me of pokemon for some reason).
Also, +10 internetz for the Thor picture xD
Bronwyn Apr 21st 2010 2:43PM
@Eternauta:
I've already renamed my huntard Ashketchum
wutsconflag Apr 21st 2010 1:05PM
And people say Blizzard never bans people. *snicker*
PJ Apr 21st 2010 1:33PM
They don't ban people, this is just a lie.
prenden2 Apr 21st 2010 1:46PM
@PJ If the ban is a lie, does this mean that the cake is a ban?
Mure Apr 21st 2010 1:56PM
I Love logical arguments =D
garretttheengineer Apr 21st 2010 2:03PM
my D2 account was banned. hopefully the cd key will come back after 30 days... I don't know how to tell.
Felix_NZ Apr 21st 2010 4:45PM
This isn't an argument! Its just contradiction!
vazhkatsi Apr 21st 2010 6:04PM
if all cake is a lie, and all ban is a lie, are all cakes a ban? not all lies are bans and not all lies are cake, so no
Biskit333 Apr 21st 2010 6:18PM
@ Felix_NZ, No it isn't!
minttunator Apr 22nd 2010 1:41AM
I'd love for them to ban 320 000 bots in WOW too... that day will never come though, as the bots are paying customers (whereas they were making no additional money from the WC3 and D2 players). =(
Yarz Apr 26th 2010 11:39AM
Mmmmm cake *drool*
obarthelemy Apr 21st 2010 1:06PM
I think that banning a whole batch of people every once in a very long while is assholish:
1- cheaters have a long time to ruin the game for legit players
2- naive cheaters, who think they won't get banned, that their hack is acceptable... have no way to know they WILL be banned
3- in the mean time, blizzard makes money.
Spazmoose Apr 21st 2010 1:14PM
News Flash:
If it looks like a hack, smells like a hack, acts like a hack...it is probably a hack...and you will likely eventually get banned.
JC_Icefox Apr 21st 2010 1:19PM
While I agree with point 1, it's rather absurd to think that "oh, I'm cheating in a game that says I can be banned on the whims of an invisible overlord, I see no flaws in this plan!"
You cheat, you ought to be banned. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but one day. And for the rest of your account life.
Also, how does Blizzard make more money? I thought those games were free to play on Battle.net?
clundgren Apr 21st 2010 1:18PM
I sort of agree with this sentiment, though not necessarily with the way it is expressed.
By tolerating cheating for a long time, Blizzard allows a culture of cheating to develop, to the point that many players feel A) that they need to do it also in order to compete, and B) it isn't really cheating anyway, since it is so widespread and nothing is done about it.
We actually see this with real world laws, and there is considerable legal precedent to suggest that when laws are seldom enforced, or enforced in what seems like an arbitrary manner, they lose validity and may even be overturned in court when challenged.
I don't play these games, and this is not to say that I endorse cheating, because I don't. But I think it is correct to assert that a policy of seeming neglect followed by a massive, ruthless crackdown sends mixed signals and is potentially deeply unfair.
glyakk Apr 21st 2010 1:19PM
With diablo at least, bliz does not charge a monthly fee. Unlike world of warcraft, once you buy the game you have unlimited access to the servers to play. So no they didn't make extra money waiting to do the bans. Wouldn't make a difference if they banned somebody sooner or later, either way their account is going to get banned eventually.
Lycius Apr 21st 2010 1:24PM
Explain #3 to me. I thought WC3 and Diablo 2 as well as SC use Battle.net to play online which is a free service. So how they make money off sonethung free?
KJP Apr 21st 2010 1:24PM
Maybe not the word I'd use (unless I was one of the banned, I suppose) but definitely a sign of dysfunctional TOS enforcement.