Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-30-2010 @ 6:03PM
DeathPaladin said...
Random can be interesting, but not when random is the only determining factor for whether you win or lose. Powerball and slot machines cater more to the fantasy of getting rich without having to work.
The more glamorous games are things like blackjack or craps. They are also random, but they also require knowing how to capitalize on the randomness if you want a better chance at making a profit.
On a different note, I can see taking out random stun mechanics. From a design standpoint, it's really difficult to create a situation where you don't have one of the two situations cropping up:
1. The stun is so powerful that you can only really win in fights where it procs
2. The stun is so weak that it might as well not exist