[1. Local]: Psychology

It's an interesting coincidence that so many quotables this week had something to do with our mental processes. For example, when Brian Wood pretended to interview Ghostcrawler for Scattered Shots, the faux-Ghostcrawler said the following:
Brian's favorite response was from Undra:Anyway, so the chimp has a lever, and when it pulls the lever it gets a piece of lettuce. Chimps like lettuce; it's tasty. So the chimp loves the experiment to death. Pull the lever, get more lettuce, eat the lettuce and pull the lever. Then after a while, the researchers change things up. One time, the chimp pulls the lever and gets a grape. Chimps love grapes; they're way better than lettuce. But then the chimp pulls the lever again and it goes back to getting lettuce. Now the chimp gets pissed off and throws the lettuce at the researchers.
So just a minute ago the chimp was loving the lettuce, and now it's insulted to be given that garbage. The lettuce didn't get any worse or any less tasty, but the chimp's perception of the value of the lettuce changed. MMO players are even more extreme -- in an MMO if the players even hear that we considered giving grapes, they'll suddenly be insulted with the lettuce that they loved until that point. So while we can't avoid every nerf, we really try to avoid as many as we possibly can.
Promises, promises. I promise we have more psychology related comments and some that only slightly have to do with what's in our noggin. And I also promise no mention of sparkle ponies. Well, except that one. I broke my promise while making my promise. Wrap your noggin around that.Ghostcrawler promised me a grape!
The psychology behind antisocial behavior
When Drama Mama Lisa and I answered Antisocial's letter about his troubles making friends, I was moved by a response that really shows what it's like to be on the other side and how being antisocial could be a psychological problem. It also gives me another excuse to show off my new awesome Drama Mama Robin avatar, created by Kelly Aarons. Awesome.
In all seriousness though. People like you are the reason I stopped roleplaying, the reason I stopped raiding with any regularity, and the reason I stopped trying to meet new people. I'm socially nervous at best, and there's really only so many times you can tell yourself "It's okay, I can handle this" when every time you venture out of your shell you run into someone who has a laundry list of things that tick him or her off for no particular reason, and that no one could possibly predict. I mean, just confining it to roleplayers, pull up any forum topic with a title like "What Are Your RP Pet Peeves?" and discover a magical world where within ten different posts by ten different people, there are twenty different completely contradictory things guaranteed to drive someone into a frothing rage and never speak to you again.
I'd like to tell you that part of living in society is getting over the fact that occasionally, people will do things that annoy you; and if you're unable to handle it to the point that you're driving people away, that you actually need to expose yourself to "happy, well-balanced" individuals. If my guess is right, you're fairly young, have always been the type to keep to a handful of friends, and carefully screen people you interact with to make sure that they fit your personality and interests. To be blunt, you have trouble making and keeping friends and finding people you're compatible with because you have few or no social skills. Your standards are impossibly high because you feel out of control when someone does or says something that doesn't fit your view, and I'm going to venture a guess that you're unforgiving when your friends slip up and stop being the "perfect" match you thought they were. You're probably equally judgmental toward yourself (you have that tone in your letter that suggests that you're trying to put your flaws forward "realistically" before anyone else gets the chance).
I'd like to tell you to get help, and find a therapist that you can talk to, because you won't find any good friends trying to avoid happy, well-balanced people. Those are the people you want to be friends with, and you probably find them annoying because you're not happy or well-balanced and it's so damn tiring to try to keep up and be who you think they want you to be. They probably seem like aliens to you. I'd like to tell you to try anyway, except as someone whose sole outlet for social interaction is currently long-winded posts on this website, I'm not sure that I'm qualified to give advice, armchair diagnoses aside.
Understanding psychology
When Michael Sacco noticed that the readers were favoring orc for his Choose my Adventure warlock, he took to the @WoWInsider twitter account to sway the vote toward blood elf. In our virtual office, our resident shadow priest seemed to express the sentiment behind the immediate surge in orc votes.
Fox Van Allen: After you tweeted, I went to vote for orc. That is what you get for not understanding how psychology works.
Stretching the theme
Does our taste in eye candy have anything to do with psychology? I'm sure we can make an argument for it. Regardless, our spotlight now shines on this conversation about Alex Ziebart giving us some male eye candy in The Queue to complement Monday's female offering.
Endario: Clooney? Clooney!? Bah!archbaotho: Are you "bah"-ing clooney?!?! Come on, look at that face!!!! I'm male and even I'd let Clooney touch me at night ... You know he'd cuddle after. That's the kind of security I want.
Endario: Hey hey, I said nothing about kicking him out of bed. I'm just sayin' he was an uninspired choice. It's like saying Brad Pitt is hot or that a pizza party with Taylor Lautner and John McCain would be freaking amazing: it goes without saying.
Not related to psychology at all
Griftah is my go-to guy when I write about scams and account theft, but this decision was questioned recently and many voted the dissension up in agreement.
Jormund Fenris: I'm confused over why you've used a picture of Griftah in this post. I mean, he seems totally legit to me. He sold me an Infallibe Tikbalang Ward not long ago and I've NEVER been attacked by those nasty tikbalangs! Let's not even mention his amazing Soap on a Rope.
Awesome.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, [1.Local]






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Elladin May 2nd 2010 2:19PM
That first bit with Ghostcrawler was so funny
Undra May 3rd 2010 10:57AM
Today I woke up and as I got ready for work, randomly decided to check wow.com, and received the greatest gift of all:
Approval from my peers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQXNi9d1WvE
Daniel May 2nd 2010 2:21PM
I'm sorry that I missed the original article. First, the lettuce "response" that Brian gave is plagiarism of an article written back in 2001 by Microsoft researcher John Hopson called "Behavioral Game Design" and which is still on-line here:
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3085/behavioral_game_design.php
(See page 2.)
Second, I'd like to point out that this study upon which John's point was based has been thoroughly discredited by primate researchers. It has no psychological validity whatsoever.
Ametrine May 2nd 2010 2:28PM
Most game players, however, tend to be significantly more reactionary and petty than most chimps.
FiredCylinder May 2nd 2010 2:31PM
Who peed in your cheerios?
Robin Torres May 2nd 2010 2:57PM
The part I didn't link from the Scattered Shots post was
"A good example to highlight this is a test behavioral researchers did with chimpanzees. The researchers put a lever in the monkey's cage, and whenever he'd --"
It isn't plagiarism if you are referring to something and summarizing it. He isn't taking credit for the study at all, not even fictionally. What would be plagiarism is if someone else wrote this post and he copied it here, claiming it is his and just changing some of the words.
Avan May 2nd 2010 4:47PM
Is that the paper that mentions Skinner Boxes and calling players "participants" like they're lab rats? If so, that's exactly where I started my game design job.
It's a great paper.
Squatstopee May 2nd 2010 5:00PM
Crikey! The elusive Internet troll shows his face and exhibits their awesome ability to make themselves look like an ass for all of us to see. We may never see it happen agai....
paul May 2nd 2010 6:12PM
It isn't plagiarism if you are referring to something and summarizing it. He isn't taking credit for the study at all, not even fictionally. What would be plagiarism is if someone else wrote this post and he copied it here, claiming it is his and just changing some of the words. All the best, paul.
Wut?
Portals May 2nd 2010 6:33PM
I think someone needs a grape...
Captain Zig Zag May 2nd 2010 7:59PM
Never let the truth get in the way of a cool story, bro.
John Hopson May 2nd 2010 8:39PM
Speaking as the author of the Gamasutra article, there's no worry of plagiarism here. The anecdote (and the hundreds of behavioral research on the topic) are well known and didn't originate with me.
Besides, I've really enjoyed and benefited from Brian's articles while gearing up my hunter alt. :)
theRaptor May 2nd 2010 10:19PM
While that study may have been discredited in primates the observed effect that if you switch from a large reinforcer to a smaller reinforcer* you will get less instrumental responses is still consistent with rat studies.
And in my book lab rats are smarter and more logical than the average MMO player.
* The really interesting thing is that say if one group goes from four food pellets to two they will have a large drop in responding, while another can go from one pellet to two and have a large jump in responding and respond more than the first group when it was given four food pellets. Reactions to rewards is based more on the comparative expectation of reward and not the absolute size of it. Which is why pre-nerfing and buffing is the optimal game design method.
Jormund Fenris May 2nd 2010 2:58PM
Soap on a Rope not related to psychology?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=armpit-psychology-body-odor
That is all.
Skittles May 2nd 2010 3:52PM
So, a totally unrelated question, what is it like at the WoW.com workplace? Do you just go up to each other and say stuff like "yo Alex I might be late to write my column because of the wife, can you cover for me?" or like "pssst, Adam's coming act like your working!"
greenthumbs May 2nd 2010 4:31PM
It must get pretty tense at office parties when Christian Belt and Dominic Hobbs are around.
Kaleo May 2nd 2010 5:50PM
It would be a fairly one sided fight though. While Hobbs throws small coloured circles of paper, Belt would be throwing ice cubes, which would hurt like hell.
archbaotho May 3rd 2010 12:56AM
Yea, but then domonic would sick his dog on him. and give him a nasty cold
pancakes May 3rd 2010 10:07AM
Let's hope that they don't decide that they're specced Fire/Dest. Or at least that there are fire extinguishers handy.
GrumblyStuff May 2nd 2010 4:27PM
"It's like saying [...] that a pizza party with Taylor Lautner and John McCain would be freaking amazing: it goes without saying."
John "Maverick" McCain who recently said that he never considered himself to be a maverick? http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001775-503544.html