Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-24-2010 @ 9:29PM
Evadora said...
I love being a Mage.
Love it.
We're smart. We Nuke things. We're sexy. Way sexy actually. And clean, so fresh and so clean. Unlike Warlocks that slut it up with Succubi.
So yeah I love being a Mage.
However it's when I'm healing that I hate Warlocks the most.
Let me rephrase that.
However it's when I'm healing that I hate bad Warlocks the most.
Now the development team is trying to put bad Mages on my hate list.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'd like to believe that this Burnout mechanic will not lead to the douchebaggery that is:
"WTF Healer thanks for the heals."
I don't want to start getting this from Mages.
/sigh
Reply
6-13-2010 @ 6:27PM
theatermusic87 said...
I think it'll be good fire mages that burnout 25% of their health... evocate... burnout 25% of their health after they burn through their mana... pop a gem... repeat... use a pot... etc... and allow healers the chance to top them off when they have time...
similiar to using gems and evocate now when you're getting low on mana but not out to start the cooldown going before you really need it