Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-15-2010 @ 9:06AM
Scooter said...
Ah, If only I made a warrior far back enough to have the level 70 version.. I would dual wield the frost scythes and do that spinny thing they do
Reply
6-15-2010 @ 9:21AM
Veras Gunn said...
Doesn't really matter anyaway. Warriors can't dual wield staves.
6-15-2010 @ 9:37AM
Nathanyel said...
proof: http://www.wowhead.com/spell=46917
"Requires One-Handed Axes, Two-Handed Axes, One-Handed Maces, Two-Handed Maces, One-Handed Swords, Two-Handed Swords, Fist Weapons, Daggers"
So only the typical "physical melee" weapons - polearms apparently were already considered unusual melee weapons in 3.0 since WotLK polearms always had Agility and were thus aimed at hunters - and ferals after 3.0.8
6-15-2010 @ 10:32AM
Scooter said...
I still wana do it. I just think a gnome buzz-saw would make a hilarious screenshot.