Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-21-2010 @ 2:10PM
Meiam said...
I agree 100%, furthermore if the talent system was still used, it would allow for better perk, lets say instead of having 5% increase rep for PvP and 5% increase rep for PvE, you could instead have 10% for one or the other with talent since it would be more specialized. Overall I feel like blizzard is just trying to cut the amount of staff they need to run WoW during the cata expansion even more.
Reply
6-21-2010 @ 2:12PM
Lotheron said...
So you'd rather miss out on available talents, for a perk?!
I'm not seeing the logic here.
6-21-2010 @ 2:17PM
Meiam said...
I'd rather miss out on stuff I'll never use for stuff I never use for better stuff I use all the time. It's also like normal class talent tree, if blizzard gave everybody all the talent in the tree, there would be no specialization, I find that boring. Saying yu dont like guild talent tree is akin to saying theres should be no class talent tree, heck that there should be no class, since its more convenient for you to be able to access everything anytime.
6-21-2010 @ 2:45PM
Meiam said...
Now we have a classic example of a pretty deep problem, my original comment is currently getting down ranked because it goes against the general opinion of the people reading this article, not because there's no argumentation in it or it's inappropriate, but because it's different (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ is a good example). While people who are going with the general flow are getting promoted, even thought some have no argument.
Now this is a problem since if someone was to read the comment section to have a general view of the current opinion, but wouldn't read the gray out comment thinking they were inappropriate, they would think that 100% of reader think this article is wrong. Lets not forget that sometime the minority is right, when people started saying the earth was round, the church threaten them even thought they were right.
6-21-2010 @ 3:43PM
Thatacus said...
Getting your comment downranked doesn't necessarily mean that your post was spam/inappropriate/wrong, all it simply means is people do not like/agree with what you're saying. People who get their posts upranked just means people agree with their opinion.
Imagine it like you're at a conference and someone says something that everyone agrees to and everyone around him/her is clapping and cheering, that's the equivalent to upranking. Downranking is just people booing him/her.
No one is saying your comment lacks argument, it's just not what people agree to.