Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-21-2010 @ 2:16PM
Awwjwah said...
Personally the only thing I agree with you on is your statement concerning Blizz wanting to cause less drama. You are right there, there are many factors in this game that cause drama that is by design and this simply would have been another that could be altered by the gm of a guild.
As for removing them and going with an "all" talent option? I don't think it is bad. The defining characteristics of a guild should be the players, not minor, mediocre or major talents and bonuses the guild brings to the table based on a talent build. The characteristics should be based purely on the players themselves. If you find yourself in a guild full of asshats then you should leave the guild to find likable players, not spend days, weeks, months finding another guild with the same no amount of perks yours has. Then you are basing your choices off of mechanics and not people.
Reply