The Care and Feeding of Warriors: Wrath report card -- protection

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

6-25-2010 @ 7:38PM

Sleutel said...

There were definitely some balance issues that needed to be addressed--even later in Wrath--but I think a lot of those, especially the HP-related ones, have been fixed by more recent patches. (The change to Vitality especially was overdue and quite welcome.) I still think the Warbringer nerf in response to PvP was a huge hit to PvE Prot Warriors.

But overall, I'm very happy with my class and spec right now. I am and always will be a Prot War, but it's especially nice when I feel comfortable with the viability of the spec, whether objectively or in comparison to other tanks.

6-25-2010 @ 8:20PM

Hades said...

"...protection actually saw a brief window of PvP viability in arena and is still fairly strong for certain kinds of BG play."

Prot Warriors were not just viable, they were insanely overpowered. Prot is STILL a completely viable option in arena... i.e. Pal/Hunter/Prot

6-26-2010 @ 5:46AM

theRaptor said...

So insanely OP that most of the top warriors were still arms. Can't have anything alter the status quo of 15 second arena matches. The horror, the horror, the horror.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.