Skip to Content
7-07-2010 @ 1:39PM
This kinda makes sense.The big reason for the cap going to 85 instead of 90 was talent bloat. The main thing I'm worried about is this:"The passive bonuses range from flat percentage increases, like a 20% increase to Fire damage for Fire mages or spell range increases for casters, to more interesting passives such as the passive rage regeneration of the former Anger Management talent for Arms warriors"I really hope that means there are no talents for "+ damage over time", "increase crit damage by X%", "range increased by X" or "resource regen by X" talents anymore. I was very, very saddened to see variations of those in the previewed talent trees. Players shouldn't be forced into "meditation" talents or 'armor/aspect', healers or dps.We want the Body & Soul/Lightning Overload/Backdraft/Moonkin Frenzy/Blood craze/Tidal Wave/Lock'n'Load stuff... The cooldowns, the procs, the chance on hits, the interesting interactions that usually only appear as tier bonuses. That's what we want for our talent trees. And I hope that's what we're getting.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.