Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-21-2010 @ 6:18PM
tlaxcala said...
Why do people celebrate her books so much? They are awful. I've read two of her Warcraft books and they both read like a cliffnotes summary of a book. No depth, no character development and little hope that she's going to get better at this. Granted, Knaak is probably worse, but this doesn't make her books any less awful.
Reply
7-21-2010 @ 7:02PM
Hollow Leviathan said...
They may not be masterworks, but people enjoy them. I enjoy bad things all the time, like the movie Underworld. Being as this is a WoW-themed newsblog, and not critical book review themed, I try and understand when they mention things I don't myself like about the expanded universe.
7-21-2010 @ 8:37PM
GeminiMars said...
I have to agree. I found Knaak's novels far more compelling - Arthas read like a bad novelization of a movie, all recount and little depth.
7-21-2010 @ 10:39PM
theminifig said...
I certainly don't see you writing books based on the Warcraft universe.
7-22-2010 @ 3:49AM
Muse said...
Keep in mind that writers who do tie-in work aren't necessarily throwing their entire skill and ability into the book. They're writing a tie-in work. In this case for a computer game. It means that even if Golden is perfectly capable of writing a twelve-novel epic odyssey to rival LotR, it wouldn't be appropriate for the Warcraft universe. In fact, it would probably just confuse the majority of the readers who aren't going to remember that chance meeting between two characters for half a scene on page 211 and realise that it has a massive impact on the rest of the story. (Do you remember that Elaida met Padan Fain? Yeah, that kind of oops.)