The Light and How to Swing It: The Val'anyr effect

Every class was designed with a specific flavor in mind. If you read Blizzard's official descriptions of the classes, you'll see that skills and abilities were not assigned at random. These paradigms of thinking for each class pulled from fantasy archetypes and characters from Warcraft's rich lore. Each class had a purpose, and those purposes were what made the game diverse. With 40 people in a raid, you could easily assume that every one of these crucial roles was filled. Unfortunately, that doesn't carry over to today's raiding scene. With the seemingly constant shrinkage of the de facto raid size from 40, to 25, to 10, it's become more and more difficult for the developers to ensure that we'll have all of the tools and abilities available in the game.
Blizzard's faced with the tough challenge of trying to ensure that each class stays unique, but also allowing for enough overlap that you're not forced to raid with a perfect mix. Bloodlust has always been the posterchild for this war between uniqueness and homogenization. Shamans have claimed that Bloodlust is their right alone, but the developers decided to give the ability to mages as well. Discipline priests, the sleeper healers of Wrath that went from useless bubblers to raid-shielding gods, were next in Blizzard's sights. Luckily for us, the devs chose paladins to be the recipients of this socialist disbursement.
Our mastery bonus, according to the latest word from the Cataclysm beta, will place absorb shields on targets of our heals. The shields will absorb 8 percent of the amount of the original heal, with that percent scaling higher as we get the mastery stat on our gear. Currently, priests are the only healers with any sort of absorption effect. They've got both Power Word: Shield and Power Word: Barrier, though these are actively-cast absorption spells. Discipline priests also produce shields when they critically hit with a heal, via Divine Aegis. Our effect is clearly different from these, and actually has more in common with a few items than it does with an existing spell or talent.
Absorption bubbles are nothing new
You're probably familiar with Val'anyr, the only healing legendary and the symbolic healing weapon of Wrath. It has a proc that allows for our heals to produce bubbles on our targets, which is exactly what our new mastery bonus will accomplish. Val'anyr may be the example most embedded in recent memory, there was actually an item long before Ulduar that yielded the same effect. One of the optional bosses in the Temple of Ahn'Qiraj, Viscidus, dropped a trinket called the Scarab Brooch. It produced the same messianic effect, turning healing into bubbles right before our very eyes.
The problem with both the legendary and the trinket is the fact that they both had limited uptime. Val'anyr's effect was only active a percentage of the time, meaning it could proc at an inopportune time. The Scarab Brooch's long cooldown actually makes it more effective to use as an "external tank cooldown" rather than a part of our normal healing strategy. Our mastery bonus is currently worded to be a passive boost at all times, which changes the way we think about it. Blizzard also removed Sacred Shield from our toolbox, so it's clear that this mastery bonus was intended to be our prime source of preventative healing.
Our mastery bonus is powerful
It's easiest to model the bonus as a static 8 percent boost to all healing done, even overhealing. The true potency is actually far greater. It allows us to raise effective tank HP, and means that not all overhealing is wasted. I am particularly interested to see how it interacts with Beacon of Light. If the transferred Beacon heal produces a bubble, it means that our Beacon target will be even safer while we heal the rest of the group. It will also increase the potency of our AoE heals, although it remains to be seen how powerful Healing Hands is in practice.
The key to this mastery bonus' success or failure is in the stacking. If each of our heals replace a previous bubble, then it's possible we'll run into the issue where we heal twice between boss swings, yet only one heal's worth of shield is active. If each of our heals stack into a single, powerful shield, it's would allow us to use tactics like unloading our cooldowns early to give the tank a massive absorption shield to survive some brutal attack. Divine Aegis, the discipline priest talent, currently allows for the absorption effects to stack, so I hope Blizzard continues along that train of thought for our mastery bonus.
Preventive healing rounds out the class
Blizzard wants every healing class to be somewhat capable of playing any healing role. Druids and priests should be able to heal the tanks and paladins and shamans should be able to heal the raid. The spells that each class has gained in Cataclysm clearly show that paradigm being enforced. However, there aren't two sides to healing, but rather there are three. Healing the tank requires powerful single-target healing, healing the raid requires multi-target heals, and preventative healing requires HoTs or absorption effects that can be leveraged ahead of time. Preventative healing also adds more skill and strategy to healing, as we have to make decisions about spell usage before anyone actually takes damage.
With the removal of Sacred Shield, we also lost the Flash of Light HoT effect from Infusion of Light. Absorption effects will effectively be our only preventative heal, and so ensuring that they're powerful enough for us to get the job done will be incredibly important. Just look at the heroic Lich King encounter-discipline priests are simply irreplaceable. Holy paladins can try to stand in their shoes, but we simply had no way to prepare 25 people to be hit by a powerful attack outside of cooldowns. Giving us a way to proactively heal our group could be the last piece needed in making holy paladins the complete healing package.
Filed under: Paladin, (Paladin) The Light and How to Swing It






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
prenden2 Aug 1st 2010 4:08PM
Given this new mastery and Blizzard's emphasis on mana-conservation and comparatively fewer instances of insta-gibs, I could really see Crit-Mastery gear becoming the ideal stat combination on our gear.
Elmouth Aug 2nd 2010 1:24AM
"Blizzard also removed Sacred Shield"
Wasn't that just temporary so they could test the 8%?
I'll be seriously pissed if they don't give it back.
BurgerTea Aug 1st 2010 4:13PM
Woa, that trinket is amazingly badass. Nice article, pro.
ToyChristopher Aug 1st 2010 4:19PM
You really forgot to mention that the uptime on the shield according to the beta is 6 seconds. Our mastery is still powerful and I would love to try it out but preventative shielding it is not.
Chase Christian Aug 1st 2010 4:43PM
Not preventative like having 25 shields up, but we can shield 5 people before an AoE. If another healer does the same thing, that's the entire raid shielded. They don't want the "one guy shields the raid" to happen any more.
ToyChristopher Aug 1st 2010 6:17PM
It still seems like an important fact to mention in the article considering that all the other effects you listed are at least twice as long or longer.
Lemons Aug 1st 2010 7:48PM
In pvp, 6 seconds is an eternity, plus that's the exact duration of Sacred Shield's bubble proc, so I don't see what you're complaining about here. You should be spamming the tank or whoever you're healing anyways so it's not like it's ever going to drop off.
Aldarion Aug 1st 2010 4:24PM
I'm sorry if I'm not right here, but isn't 'preventative' a noun, and you're using it instead of 'preventive', the adjective?
Oh, and the Scarab Brooch was a godsend back in the day. Some of our healers used it even in Sunwell Plateau.
Deathmd Aug 1st 2010 4:35PM
'Preventative' is not a noun, as a noun is an actual person, place, or thing. However, you were close. 'Preventative' is used when describing a noun, whereas 'preventive' is used when referring to a broader idea. In this case, preventative healing is correct, as within WoW, healing is a character role, and therefore a noun.
Btw i love commas. >.>
cantlogin Aug 1st 2010 5:11PM
"Preventative" can be used as both an adjective and a noun. That said, it's a less-common (in American English, at least), but quite old (M-W dates it back to circa 1666, the OED to 1655) variant of "preventive." Michael Quinion, of World Wide Words, notes that the longer version, with its stuttering middle syllables, has drawn complaints since the 1860s, and some style guides argue against it (http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-pre3.htm).
I love word origin stories, if you hadn't noticed.
Cambro Aug 1st 2010 6:36PM
Just because it's been used since the 1600s doesn't make it correct grammar. :) If "preventative" is the adjective, "preventation" would be its matching noun, which I don't believe anyone says on purpose. The noun is "prevention", so the adjective is "preventive".
Just as bad as "irregardless", which doubly negates itself yet people use it anyway. *sigh*
Kira Aug 1st 2010 9:52PM
your right cambro, how longs its been in use doesnt make it proper grammar. It BEING PROPER GRAMMAR is what makes it proper grammar.
Derbeste Aug 2nd 2010 2:42AM
"Preventative" can also be an adverb.
As in: Preventative healing
In this case Preventative is describing the present tense verb "Healing".
This can become confusing as "healing" can also be used as a noun. IE "He threw out some preventative healing." In this case preventative is an adjective.
Oy......Internet English is Weird.
RavenJet Aug 2nd 2010 4:08AM
Actually "preventative" is also a noun - it's a euphemism for "condom".
shadcroly Aug 1st 2010 4:40PM
http://db.mmo-champion.com/s/64891/
Probably not as powerful as our current Infusion of Light, but it's something, I guess...
Chase Christian Aug 1st 2010 4:42PM
That's a mistake in the data mining, that's just our old 2-piece tier bonus from Ulduar I believe.
mor8idhomogenosuicide Aug 2nd 2010 2:35AM
I believe it's 4 piece Tier 9, but yeah, it's a (fairly rubbish) old tier bonus :)
mor8idhomogenosuicide Aug 2nd 2010 2:39AM
EDIT: I really shouldn't post this early when I haven't gone to sleep yet.. don't know why I posted without checking haha.
I am entirely wrong and the wonderful Paladin columnist is of course right. :)
Downrate away please, and since I couldn't find a button consider this post a "delete both these posts please if you can be bothered".
zdave Aug 1st 2010 5:41PM
This mastery seems ok for now. It will definitely be a problem if their shields start being stronger than a disc priest's shields.
ToxicPopsicle Aug 1st 2010 11:51PM
I doubt that'd happen with disc's mastery increasing their shield's amount absorbed. It'll likely be a lesser version of their bubbles so every raid doesn't need a disc priest.