Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-10-2010 @ 6:08PM
theminifig said...
"As a short gloss, I'm seeing Swipes in the 200-300 range, Mangles in the 1,200 to 3,000 range, Thrash around the 100-170 range, etc."
Sweet Thrall's soiled diaper.. 3,000 damage swipes.
That's a WONDERFUL chunk of damage.
Reply
8-10-2010 @ 6:39PM
Felix_NZ said...
You're off by a factor of 10.
8-10-2010 @ 6:43PM
theminifig said...
Felix_NZ did you not just read the article?
I quoted it verbatim.
8-10-2010 @ 7:29PM
Dreamer said...
You quoted verbatim, and then switched a few words around:
SWIPES in the 200-300 range, MANGLES in the 1200-3000
It's a possibility that they could drop lacerate down to 3 stacks from 5 and it would be far less demanding of GCDs, oh and how easy/hard is it to solo group quests and whatnot, with LotP giving 8% max hp instead of 4% and general "zomg i haz many healths"
8-10-2010 @ 10:03PM
Felix_NZ said...
"I quoted it verbatim."
/facepalm
8-11-2010 @ 4:01AM
Snuzzle said...
THey should drop Lac down to 3 stacks, imo and then rebalance it around that. As far as I'm aware, Lac was supposed to be sort of a "bear's Sunder" in that it was what we were supposed to stack to get threat in the same way as a warrior will stack Sunders. Sunder has been dropped down to 3 stacks (mostly because they don't want the armor reduction a 5-stack grants) yet Lac is still at 5. I'm confident Lac will be rebalanced in a similar fashion.