All the World's a Stage: How Blizzard supports roleplay

I'm not pointing any fingers, but I come across that statement from time to time. The phrase usually shows up when someone's getting their disgruntled on about how Blizzard clearly never enforces the roleplay naming policy. But you also see this phrase get trotted out when someone wants to illustrated how you rarely see a "content patch" focused on roleplay issues or such.
The phrase tires me out whenever I see it. It's a rather hackneyed complaint that presumes a whole lot about why people play the game, why they roleplay and even how they roleplay. In some MMORPGs, you can barely interact with the environment and spend the whole time in a single pose or two. In Dark Age of Camelot, I'm pretty sure we could only sit or stand. But I have great memories of roleplaying in DAoC.
But, still, it might help if we took the time to review some ways in which Blizzard does support roleplay. If we can count some of our blessings, we might have a better idea of their existence.
Someplace to sit
It might not seem like much, but there are a lot of places you can simply sit down on a bench or chair. You can pull up a seat at a table. While this little touch is fairly meaningless to raiders or PvP players, the simple ability to park your kiester means all the world to a roleplayer.
The racial sit emotes would look silly for serious, serious conversations. When you're talking over deep and meaningful angst, it really helps to park your bottom on an actual chair. There's just a sense of gravitas associated with taking a load off your tired dogs and focusing on what your roleplaying partner has to say. I'm thankful for the ability to sit.
Upper floors
In the same token as having someplace to sit, you'll find many inns and buildings in capital cities and questing zones are endowed with a second floor. You run upstairs to see a bed, bookcase and other sundry trappings of an "upstairs." And pretty often, there's not any actual point to that floor. It's just there for ambiance and flavor.
Really, though, almost all the things in the game that are simply "ambiance and flavor" are roleplay things. Raiders and PvP players might not think of these things as escapist trappings, but experienced roleplayers should understand that anything that enhances immersion is helping to convey a roleplay atmosphere.
Books to read
Most of the books sitting around actually support important World of Warcraft lore. Other books, however, are just quirky little pieces of background. Lore and roleplay are intrinsically tied together. You can't have an actor without a setting; similarly, you can't have roleplay without a convincing universe in which to interact.
Still, I like the idea of characters hanging out and reading. It's little bits of news and story to talk about, especially if you're the kind of roleplayer who avoids talking about quests. (Some folks do that to avoid the problem wherein you killed Arthas, and he killed Arthas, and she killed Arthas -- but none of you killed him at the same time.)
Vanity pets
Vanity pets aren't likely to be the keystone to raising your roleplay to a whole new level. But these flavorful little buddies do a lot to add color and interest to individual characters. Maybe your dwarf is a kitty-loving kind of guy. Your orc might want to rock out with a roach. Since there are so many different non-combat pets, there's really a lot of opportunity to expand your repertoire.
These vanity pets also serve as great fodder for emote-based roleplay. You can enrich your actions by describing how your pet reacts to the local environment, and of course, how you react to your pet. You can pet them, stroke them and talk to them. Little props always enhance your immersion and interaction, so vanity pets are just awesome.
Roleplay clothing
If you've not cruised around the vendor establishments in Dalaran, I suggest hitting the tailor shops. Within, you'll find a dozen different items for your character, none of which have any bonus stats at all. If the game is simply about getting your stats as high as possible, it would be difficult to explain these items.
But the reality is that roleplay clothing means the world to those of us who just want to play dress up with our characters and hang out in Dalaran. I have a bank alt entirely dedicated to interesting tops and bottoms that aren't soulbound; I make up the occasional new outfit and send it out to whichever character I'm playing at the time.
Naming policy
While I know it's fashionable to complain about Blizzard's not enforcing the naming policy, there are a couple problems with that issue. First, we don't know whether the policy is being supported in any given individual case. Blizzard is made up of rational people, and a rational person gives a transgressor the opportunity to mend his ways. Game masters can't just willy-nilly ban every player who runs afoul of the naming policy. Instead, they must engage the opportunity to educate a new player and help that player find his way into the loving folds of roleplaying.
Second and more importantly, the roleplay server naming policy supports roleplaying because exists in the first place. There are rules about how you can name a character who exists on a roleplay server. And while Blizzard's enforcement of the rules might not be perfect, Blizzard does issue some enforcement. If Blizzard were truly without care or support for the roleplaying environment, it would not do even this much. The simple fact that rules exist shows Blizzard cares.
Filed under: All the World's a Stage (Roleplaying)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Izaach Sep 19th 2010 8:17PM
7th Reason:
/e
TonyMcS Sep 19th 2010 9:12PM
It may be a surprise to those whose DNA combined only in the last few decades. but roleplaying has been going on for a long time - sometimes with the only tools being a couch to sit on.
Roleplaying is essentially in your head, so while it's nice to have some of the things Blizzard provide, they aren't really necessary.
rotny Sep 19th 2010 11:16PM
I play on Maelstrom (RPPVP realm) and yet I see people with non-rp names constantly.
Can these people still be made to change their names with a gm ticket?
I used to do this allt he time and I know it worked.
These days I'm not so sure anymore. Anyone have a link to an official post?
Joker Sep 20th 2010 1:37AM
We pay money for the game, the least Blizz should be doing is cleaning up the non RP people from the RP servers.
On Vco there hasn't been a RP world PVP battle since before WoTLK.
No one even defends towns any more, if you tell trade Tarren Mill is under attack, they respond "why should we care? PVP is for noobs.", but before WoTLK you would get spammed with "On my way!".
What's worse is we have people worried about progression on a RP-PVP server.
Hillsbrad Security is dead and so is Blacktooth Grin, non RP people killed my server.
Vco used to be amazing, just read this.
http://www.wowwiki.com/Server:The_Venture_Co_US
My server used to be mature and friendly but now it's filled with annoying children that should be playing on a PVP server with the other kids and not turning my server into a cesspool.
Hih Sep 19th 2010 8:17PM
Regarding the naming policy, Blizzard rarely will proactively enforce that. They rely on players to report naming transgressions to GMs so they can reactively enforce the policy.
Hih Sep 19th 2010 8:21PM
*cough edit cough*
If you don't believe me, next time you see a person with a naming violation, hit that little red ? button down on the bottom of your screen. Then click the "Report Problem" button. Write a little 1-3 sentence thing explaining the name, the server, and why it's a violation.
Now, add the person to your friends list. If their name does get changed, you'll see when and what to. I've even reported someone again because their new name was still a naming violation because I knew about it from adding them to my friends list.
Matthew Sep 20th 2010 12:17AM
I'm on an RP server.
I don't care if you don't have an RP name. I'm not going to ruin your experience by reporting you.
Your non RP name does NOT take away from my RP.
My friends AH toon was reported because it said 'bank' in it.
If you have nothing better to do than report non RP names, please RP more, RP looking the other way, etc.
This does not include blatantly offensive names, mind you . . .just non RP names.
Thanks for listening.
Xantenise Sep 20th 2010 4:34AM
@Matthew But if you don't report them, it builds up. People see they can get away with non-RP names, so they go further.
A line has to be drawn, and it has to be enforced.
Matthew Sep 20th 2010 12:03PM
I'm surprised I was voted down. I seriously don't think non-rp names on an rp server are dangerous. (There are names that are plain awful like vagiclean, which of course needs to be reported [my old guildie] but then there are names that aren't RP but are fine like 'Rickysbank' or 'oprahwndfury'
I respect RP'rs but you should respect people who want casual rp and not have a name with ebony or dragon in it.
thats all i'm saying
ScytheNoire Sep 19th 2010 8:34PM
You are so wrong about this. Blizzard does very little to allow roleplaying. Guild halls? Highly customizable characters? Altering gear for looks? Wearing cloths over gear? Character homes?
WoW is a theme park. It's not a role-playing environment.
EQ2 and LotRO have more role-playing because they allow for more customization and personalization.
CoX and CO have the most role-playing, because the super hero games allow for insane character customization.
Let me know where you see in the character pane that you write your characters backstory. Let me know when you find characters that don't all look the same. And sure as hell let me know when there are items on display in guild halls and homes that show off adventures my character has had.
WoW is not a real role-playing game. Deal with it.
Gendou Sep 19th 2010 8:50PM
So because the game doesn't have the resources YOU want, it's "not a real role-playing game?"
That's patently ridiculous.
"This game doesn't have vampires as a playable class! It's not a real role-playing game!"
"This game doesn't have player-craftable housing! It's not a real role-playing game!"
"This game doesn't have the option for going to the bathroom! It's not a real role-playing game!"
"This game doesn't have customizable mecha! It's not a real role-playing game!"
Just because the game doesn't have things built-in that you desire doesn't mean it's not a role-playing game. And just because the developers have chosen to focus their attention on areas other than guild-halls and player-housing and customizable-armor doesn't mean it's not a role-playing game.
You are not the sole arbiter of what makes a game a "role-playing game" and what does not.
Outis Sep 19th 2010 8:59PM
Guild halls and player housing have been excluded from the game because they want players out and interacting with one another in the world. They already feel that the pendulum has swung too far in favor of "sit around in capital city all day". Isn't being able to go and interact with folks with the expectation that they won't be shut up in an instanced location you can't access support of roleplay?
I am skeptical of the claim that I must be able to customize my character's appearance to a great extent to roleplay. There may be technical reasons they have chosen not to implement as detailed a character customization process as other games, but I can't claim to know anything about it one way or another. I don't spend much time looking at my character or at other people's character when we're roleplaying. I might pause to notice an interesting RP set, but that's about it - specifics about features etc. just kind of wash over me. I look at the text description in the RP addon (why should they clutter up the UI with information most players don't need? That's what the incredibly robust addon community is for!) and, more importantly, *respond to what they say and do.* Roleplaying comes from roleplaying! I got my start in P&P roleplaying, and there my character is just some numbers and words on a piece of paper - not a single image to go around.
In conclusion, I find your argument that Blizzard must provide this feature or that feature to be considered in support of roleplaying unsound. They have chosen to spend resources on certain areas and not on others - either because the consequences are something they don't like (player housing - Chilton has been quoted as saying it will be implemented "shortly after never") or because resources are needed in other areas more critically than in this (updating launch races to higher-poly models). The way to determine the issue is through looking at what's in the game and asking of *that* "does this feature set support roleplay?" And the answer is certainly yes.
loreaddict Sep 19th 2010 9:02PM
I'll have to disagree with you.
Any medium which allows you, the player, to tell a story is fit for role-play, weather it be notes on a piece of paper or cutting edge graphics on a screen. It's the story you're telling what's important, not the medium you're using to do so.
Gendou Sep 19th 2010 9:30PM
Loreaddict, you said that a lot more nicely than I did. Thank you.
Angrycelt Sep 19th 2010 9:36PM
I have to agree with a bunch of scythe's criteria though. My lvl 80 ICC raiding holy pally looks exactly like every other lvl 80 ICC raiding holy pally. And thanks to emblem purchases, like every casual non-raider too. Heck, even Everquest had the ability to custom tint armor as I recall.
City of Heroes' supergroup bases were awesome trophy halls and centers of RP as well as useful locations. And no two costumes or bases were alike. My lvl 50 defender was unique and had options for more looks that were purely cosmetic changes to further differentiate myself from everyone else.
The dungeon finder tool is a good argument against blizzard's RP support since you never have to even leave a city to level up between random instances and battlegrounds.
Gendou Sep 19th 2010 9:44PM
There are many RP conveniences that I wish WOW would have.
Guild-halls aside (I do agree with Blizzard that it would create segregation issues), I wish that there were more character customization features (such as the new upgraded faces for the older races) and vanity armor selection features (such as overcloaks). I wish that I could add a first and last name to my character without using FlagRSP or MyRolePlay. I wish there were more costumes available so that I could roleplay as different races such as Naga, Murlocs or Wolvar.
I also wish for more character slots per server and for a way to organize my characters on the loading screen in an order of my choosing. I wish for a lot of different features that WOW lacks.
But my wishing for those things - and the fact that WOW currently lacks them - does not mean that WOW is not a Roleplaying Game. It just means it lacks certain features that I'd prefer it to have. That's all.
Tabasa Sep 19th 2010 9:51PM
@Gendou -
Nothing I could add to that that you didn't already say. Very much in agreement.
Lorekin Sep 20th 2010 2:23AM
I know its nerdy of me, but I used to RP on a little game called "Furcadia". You can't customize your character hardly at all- besides choosing a species, and then you can change the color of your clothing, but not your actual displayed outfit. Movements were stiff and simple, only stand, sit and lay.
To a person truly interested in role playing, this DID NOT matter. Why would it? You could write an entire description, make up your character's build, expression and clothing. And through interaction and role playing with others they'd know what your character was really like. It didn't matter what the pixels were. It was just nice to have the option to display an actual character instead of just staring at a chat window. And you could move that character to sit on a pillow or lay on a bed. That was enough to get the point across.
I think you're expecting WAY too much. Your experience is what you make of it! If WoW's standards aren't up to your liking, go back to those other games you praise so highly. I, on the other hand, will continue to appreciate all the things that WoW does offer for role players that was so nicely covered by this post. (But I mean, come on, I definitely wouldn't complain about more customization options, but its not a HUGE deal to me...)
Aaron Sep 20th 2010 9:16AM
@Gendou "This game doesn't have the option for going to the bathroom! It's not a real role-playing game!"
Someone hasn't spent much time in Grizzly Hills. ;0)
Allison-knight Sep 20th 2010 12:54PM
Dude, there totally is an option for going to the bathroom. The only problem is that there is one toilet in all of Azeroth and the Outlands.
God I love that little outhouse at amberpine lodge :)