Know Your Lore: Orgrim Doomhammer, part 1

He is the father of the modern Horde. His name became the name of the great city built by the orcs. He found in the son of his oldest friend a protegé who would lead his people, and he passed his family's greatest treasure down to ensure that prophecy was satisfied. To his people, he was one who never forsook them. No attempts to run away from the consequences of their actions, no dissembling -- simply forthright, pragmatic action. Alone of the Blackrock Clan, he refused the taint of the demon blood, yet found himself marked by it as it spread through his people. Called the Backstabber because he killed his direct superior, Blackhand the Destroyer, he ruled the Horde until its final defeat at Blackrock Mountain.
To his enemies, he was death. He beheaded his own chieftain and seized power in one brutal moment, crushing any opposition by the swift assassination of his enemies.He destroyed Stormwind and nearly brought down Lordaeron. He killed the majority of the warlocks of the Shadow Council and removed the position of Warchief from the role of a puppet ruler, leading the Horde in truth. He asked for no quarter and gave none. He countenanced the capture and forced breeding of the dragon queen Alexstrasza and her consort Tyranastrasz, using the juvenile dragons as mounts. He allowed Gul'dan to live, even though he suspected treachery, because the old warlock promised him a weapon that could counter the magics of the humans. He was never one to put his conscience ahead of what he saw as his duty; even as he suspected the orcs were being lied to and manipulated, he took part in the slaughter of the draenei. In the end, his own pragmatism cost him the victory in the Second War, as the treacherous Gul'dan proved that placing victory above all sometimes means giving someone too much rope -- Gul'dan's betrayal of the Horde in its moment of victory effectively destroyed all of the hard work of its Warchief.
Orgrim Doomhammer, last of the Doomhammer line, Warchief of the Horde, chief of the Blackrock, was an orc, give him all in all. You shall not look upon his like again.
Before the Horde
The greatest strength of Orgrim was also his ultimate weakness: his ruthlessly pragmatic nature. A brilliant tactician and skilled warrior, Doomhammer did not particularly care for the self-examination that marked the character of his best friend and rival, Durotan of the Frostwolves. Doomhammer was not a chieftain. He was not born to rule his people, but to serve them as a descendant of the Doomhammer line, gifted for generations with the honor of carrying the weapon from which they took their name. Orgrim's father, Telkar, wielded the hammer as one of the greatest warriors of the Blackrock Clan in the time before the shaman Ner'zhul first began warning the tribes of the draenei threat. Upon Telkar's death, Orgrim assumed his role in the Blackrock Clan and proved himself every bit a Doomhammer, quickly rising to an honored position as second in command to the Blackrock chief Blackhand.
Orgrim first met Durotan at a Kosh'harg festival, and the two young orcs settled into a friendly competition that became an unusual friendship, stretching as it did across clan lines. There was no rule against this, primarily because orcish society as a whole at that time had few hard-and-fast rules at all, being decentralized and nomadic -- but it was not traditional. Still, neither young orc ever broke from this friendship, renewing it at subsequent Kosh'hargs and whenever they had the chance to meet. It was this friendly rivalry that led the two youngsters to encounter the draenei, led by the warrior Restalaan (the draenei patrol helped the two orcs against an ogre), and this meeting led to an encounter with Velen, prophet of the draenei. If Velen foresaw that these two young orcs would someday help butcher his people, he gave no sign of it, receiving them warmly and spending time conversing with them about their people and the ancient prophecy of the Doomhammer itself.
Despite this cordial reception, in later years, as Ner'zhul's warnings became urgent and the various clans of the orcs became suspicious of the draenei, Orgrim ultimately made war on the draenei. While at first he merely followed the lead of his chieftain Blackhand, in truth Orgrim enjoyed the war and began to relish the opportunity to prove himself in a far more dangerous way than the contests in which he and Durotan used to engage. While he suspected both Ner'zhul and later Gul'dan of deceiving and manipulating the orcish people, unlike his friend Durotan, he didn't question the rightness of his own actions nearly so much, accepting the orders of his clan chief. It's also possible that despite his role as second in command, Doomhammer felt somewhat uncertain in his position. Not only was his friendship with Durotan unusual, his connections with the Thunderlord clan may have made him somewhat of an outsider in the Blackrock, despite being heir to the Doomhammer.
What followed was a battle of wills between the warlock who pulled the puppet's strings and the warrior who sought to cut them. Gul'dan sought the ultimate power for himself, while Doomhammer had no particular interest in power at all. He fought in the war against the draenei because it was his duty, but also because he found that he enjoyed battle and was talented at it. The aggrandizement he sought came from this long-held need to prove himself via contest, and war provided him with the ultimate chance to do exactly that. He sought to be the first among equals and could not abide the role of puppet Warchief accepted by the boorish Blackhand.

Rise of the Warchief
Following the destruction of the draenei, the orcs began a slow decline as their world became too corrupted by the fel magics of the warlocks to support life. It's clear that watching his people's slow death affected Doomhammer deeply, as all of his actions to follow were aimed primarily at securing a future for them at any cost to anyone else. Following Blackhand to Azeroth, Doomhammer watched in dismay as his Warchief Blackhand managed to quickly lose control of the invasion and was even driven back to the swamps surrounding the Dark Portal by the armies of the native people of Azeroth, these "humans." While Gul'dan didn't really care -- he'd only invaded Azeroth in the first place in order to try and trick Medivh into revealing the location of the Tomb of Sargeras -- Doomhammer quickly grew incensed at what he saw as poor leadership by Blackhand and selfish, power-hungry manipulations by the warlocks of the Shadow Council who used Blackhand as a puppet.
By this point, any scales remaining had fallen from Doomhammer's eyes. He knew the war with the draenei had been a sham and that the invasion of Azeroth was, as well. Given the choice between dying on a blasted, dead world corrupted by Gul'dan and his sycophants, or murdering every last man, woman and child in the Kingdom of Stormwind, he took the latter option. But make no mistake; Doomhammer would be no orc's puppet. As soon as Gul'dan was distracted by events (specifically, Khadgar and Lothar's raid on Karazhan that ended Medivh's life, as Gul'dan took the opportunity to try and ransack Medivh's distracted mind and got blasted into a coma for his troubles), Doomhammer struck. He beheaded his Warchief and seized total control over the Horde. As soon as Garona returned from her mission to assassinate King Llane Wrynn, he seized her, too, and tortured her until she told him where the leadership of the Shadow Council was hiding.
Then he killed as many of them as he could get his hands on. When Gul'dan awoke, he was presented with a fait accompli. Blackhand was dead, as were the majority of his warlocks. Doomhammer fully intended to kill him, too. It's a testimony to Gul'dan's skill at saving his own green behind that he managed to convince Doomhammer not to kill him -- but it's also a testimony to Doomhammer's ruthless pragmatism. He was embroiled in a war on an alien world that was, so far as he knew, the only chance for his people to survive. He'd managed to destroy Stormwind, but the humans of that kingdom had retreated to the unknown north, leaving Doomhammer in command of a military with no idea what lay ahead of it and nothing to retreat to on Draenor. Simply put, he didn't have a lot of options at this point. He had to move fast to take advantage of the momentary triumph, and to do that, he needed magic. With shamanism effectively dead, it was warlocks or nothing.
So Gul'dan created the first death knights out of the corpses of fallen Stormwind knights and his own slain warlock followers, and Doomhammer prepared to lead the Horde -- his Horde, at last -- to its destiny in the lands of the north, what the humans called Lordaeron.
Next week, we'll discuss the Second War, which could well be called Doomhammer's War, and how he came within hours of conquering the Alliance. Then we discuss the fulfillment of prophecy and how the Doomhammer came to leave the hands of the Doomhammer line. Doomhammer was large; he contained multitudes.
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Lore, Know your Lore
Patch 5.4 patch notes
Virtual Realms feature revealed
The Proving Grounds are coming
The latest patch 5.4 news





Reader Comments (Page 3 of 4)
Murdertime Sep 23rd 2010 6:55AM
Yes. The issue is if we go by straight WC1 and 2, the Orcs were meant
to humorously over the top in their evil, like the orcs of a certain
game where Orgrim fit right in waging WAR with his HAMMER. So you need
to retcon or it just seems a little odd.
StClair Sep 23rd 2010 1:52PM
@Murdertime:
I see what you did there. :)
josh Sep 23rd 2010 12:06AM
those are horrible horrible pictures of orcs. especially the first rapunzel one
Fletcher Sep 23rd 2010 4:01AM
Sure, Orgrim didn't drink the blood of Mannoroth ... but given that he still led the genocidal campaign across Azeroth, it's hard to sympathise with him. It's like saying "Sure, I butchered that busload of orphans and made their bones into furniture, but I wasn't drunk at the time!". On the contrary, being in full control of his actions makes those actions *worse*.
Ultimately, Orgrim was far too content to go along with Gul'dan's plans, no matter where they led. About the best you can say for him is that he wasn't Grom Hellscream. I /spat on the Harvest Festival questgiver outside Orgrimmar when he wanted me to go honor Grom.
Luke Sep 23rd 2010 5:40AM
Why is it that when a person or character in lore does the right thing, for the wrong reasons they're herald as a Hero?
However, when a person or character does the wrong thing, for the right reason, they suddenly become a pariah?
Both Ogrim and Grom were facing the extinction of their people, be that by genocide or starvation. Both made poor decisions that in the end served their purpose, the survival of the Orcs. There's a reason why Grom is still known as The Redeemer.
What most people tend to overlook is that even for their noble and shamanistic tendencies, most Orcs by nature and nurture of their clans, are prideful warriors. This is what led them to the poor decisions they made. It's easy to love Thrall, but don't forget, he was raised by Humans. Not that all humans are perfect...
Dreyja Sep 23rd 2010 6:25PM
Well... I guess the body-count would be one reason. Supposedly, Arthas started doing the wrong things for the "right" reasons (though I'm not convinced). He's pretty universally loathed by both sides.
We are talking about people who slaughtered not just soldiers but innocents in astounding numbers. For me, that's a clincher. :)
Luke Sep 24th 2010 12:45AM
Dreyja
I'm sorry but the logic behind "body count for one" fails because you can't make an objective decision on what's acceptable. Meaning where do you draw the line? Ten deaths? One Hundred? A million? There are too many factors for this to pan out well logically.
To clarify where I'm coming from, I'm most definitely a Moral Skeptic. I deny the fact that morality, as such exists outside of language. There are moral opinions that seem universal (within the context of humanity). They may come very close but fail to be truth under any type of objective scrutiny.
Morality is not a rock. But mostly because we're not talking about Fraggles.
That being said, I judge actions by intent and outcome. In the case of Ogrim and Grom this makes passing judgment difficult for me.
For me, it's difficult to look at Orcs and say, "this one did this, and that one did that, and that would be pretty crappy if they did it in real life."
For one, we're talking about a race of extraterrestrial beings in a fantasy universe.
And two, as in too as well, even in their own universe we can't judge Orcs by human standards. Which is also the point I was trying to make by referencing Thrall.
Characters like Varian and Arthas, being human, CAN be judged by their actions relative to what we expect of humans. Whether we limit this examination to a game world or not because human culture in Warcraft IS modeled after our own.
Dreyja Sep 24th 2010 6:02PM
Well in that case we are coming at this from opposite ends of the spectrum because killing innocents is wrong. End. Period. Universal. The relativism you speak of is more alien to me than Orcs are.
I don't think we can really have a conversation about this becuase as long as the other races are people then there are some moral standards.
/shrug Ah well.
Yeah there is not definite line in what number is "acceptable" but I was meaning it in a broader sense. Arthas, Grom, Ogrimm... etc - they swept through lands and slaughtered everyone in their wake. I don't see how species has anything to do with it.
Luke Sep 24th 2010 11:36PM
Well sure we can have a conversation about this. It's difficult in that I have no idea if you'll see this reply, so maybe this isn't the place. However two people don't have to agree to discuss something, in fact conversations are generally more interesting when there are opposing views on the subject.
For the record though I'm not a Moral Relativist, I have opinions, but that doesn't make them truth. I think killing innocent people is wrong as well. I'm just not going to internalize my feelings on the matter and hold a fantasy creature to the same standard I would a human.
Species has everything to do with it because like I said, morality isn't actually universal, and condemning a race by standards they can't meet isn't exactly fair. I understand that this is bordering on hyperbole but I just don't see how else to put it.
If you had a child, let's say they are five years old, do they really know right from wrong? Would most kindergartners understand that killing something is morally wrong? Maybe, but it's not the same kind of knowing or understanding that an adult has.
Moving on, I think my original point could be clarified by comparison.
The Kaldori and their lust for Magic led to the Sundering. All of those events led to countless deaths, innocent deaths as well. From their perspective, and the perspective of their apologists, they weren't doing anything morally wrong, just reckless. The outcome however was bloody horrible. Wrong thing (tampering with magic), right reason (power and knowledge).
I just don't see the same kind of reviled hatred for the Night Elves that is often directed at Orcs.
And that's what I don't understand.
Roger Sep 23rd 2010 6:31AM
There is a difference between Grom and Doomhammer. Grom was an unabashed, ambitous, blood-thirsty murdering monster. He killed because he liked it. He killed to test himself and prove that was worthy of accolades. He drank the demon's blood to increase his own power making him an even more unstoppable force. So on top of his already hostile nature, now he has the influence of demon blood in his system. But then one day he looks around himself and realizes that there is more going on than just him being a great warrior that leaves the bodies of hundreds in his wake. He sees what the burning legion has not only done to himself but his people as well. He sees how his people have been reduced to nothing but shells of what used to be an independent and vibrant race. Then a light clicks on in his head and he realizes that he has helped lead everyone down this path of destruction for his own selfish desires. He sees this and takes steps to not only redeem himself from the curse of the demon blood, but his people.
Doomhammer
This guys isn't as easy an egg to crack open. He's not as simple minded as Grom is. He can see the man behind the curtain pulling the strings. He too has a need and desire to prove himself. He's the heir to a clan that has a strong history. Whereas Grom was more upfront and honest about wanting to kill anything and taking advantage of Ner'zhul's warnings about the draenai to go to war against them and slay as many as he could, Orgrim told himself that "it was for his people", when it was actually serving his interests as well. He had met with Velen and knew that they posed no threat to the orcs. When Helllscream was the first to take the demon blood from the chalice, Orgrim knew better. He knew that the blood would erode any rational thought that he was capable of making and enslave him to the burning legion. Here is the difference between the two leaders. Orgrim was just as responsible for leading his people and his world to the chaos that followed due to the fact that not only did he suspect vicous intent behind what his people were being ordered to do, but he didn't partake of the same maddening demon blood that would control the minds of the orcs from that day forward. Where the orcs became enslaved to the legion through the blood of Manneroth, everything Orgrim did was of his own free will. But even though he retained his free will, unlike Durotar, he went with the flow of things. He was a coward hiding behind the pretense of "for my people", when he like Durotar realized what was going on but unlike Durotar, didn't take the stand that was needed. Durotar was banished for his trouble.
Grom became known as the redeemer because he overcame the murderous rage pulsating in his blood and his own selfish desires to do what was best for his people. Yes he did backslide at times, but when he came to himself he was even more ashamed of himself and motivated to free his people from the curse he helped bring on them. He is the sinner who found salvation. Orgrim is the guy that was gifted with perception but was unable to take any action when it counted that could've altered the flow of events that transpired. You say they had no choice but to kill the humans when they came to Azeroth? No, he was following orders. They didn't come there to find another home. They were sent there, ordered there, to take over and make it easier for the burning legion to come take Azeroth. The others were subjucated through the demon blood, Orgrim did it out of his own free will.
Mihn Sep 23rd 2010 6:59AM
You do know that the Alliance wasn't always an "Alliance". They used to wage war on each other, fighting over land, resources, or, for the hell of it.
They are just as guilty of destruction and war as the Orcs are. They are more alike than people like to think.
Omegan01 Sep 23rd 2010 8:02AM
@arawn.chernobog:
"@Alliance members going "Horde is evhul and genocidal"
- Alliance Interment Camps (Orc Slaves yay!);"
I take issue with most of your points to greater or lesser extent, but I am going to call you out on this one, because frankly, I am sick and tired of this point being repeated essentially verbatim when it is utterly and completely wrong.
Simply put: no. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. No.
Let's condense the storyline of the first two warcraft games a bit:
There's a bunch of medieval nations. One day, without warning, a giant mob of aliens opens up a portal and attacks this group of nations. They don't negotiate. They don't discriminate between man, woman, and child. They kill everything. They summon unholy demonic creatures and grisly specters of death to kill everything in their path. Everything that can be learned about them suggest that their entire society is built for war and destruction.
For the better part of a decade this medieval bunch struggles to throw these psychotic, raving savages off their planet. They fail. They cut off the source by closing the portal, but they're left with hundreds, or thousands of these creatures held prisoner. What's more, without the demonic bloodlust they'd been sustained by, these creatures just seem to drop like drug addicts in a downer state.
So what do these dark ages - equivalent nations do with these things?
-Kill em all and let God sort em out? No.
-Kill some and try to rehabilitate the rest? No.
-Turn them loose somewhere, leaving them to rot in the grip of their withdrawl - and possibly suffer another war years down the road if they rally? No.
Sure, some members of the Alliance thought it would be morally correct to kill the orcs, but they were shouted down.
Instead, the Alliance went through the trials and tribulations of building keeps and camps to house the orcs, giving them food and shelter, and guess what? The most the orcs did was sit around or perform some menial labor, because the Alliance didn't know what else to do with them!
The only orc - the ONLY orc - who can really said to have been a slave was Thrall, and he was a completely seperate and special case - all the rest were prisoners.
Saying that the orcs were slaves to the Alliance is a complete distortion.
Painting the internment camps as an -EVIL- deed by the Alliance is outright lunacy.
The only reason the orcs are still around today is because Terenas Menethil stood up to his fellow leaders who were howling for blood and said, "no. We will not sink to that level. We will not exterminate an entire race of people. We are better than that. We will do the right thing and help those in need of it."
Of course, most orcs nowadays seem to conveniently forget this fact, running around screaming "VICTORY OR DEATH!" all the while never seeming to realize that if the Alliance had followed their own code of honor, their entire society have been twenty years dead now - dead at the hands of the victorious Alliance.
Grovinofdarkhour Sep 23rd 2010 10:33AM
"The only reason the orcs are still around today is because Terenas Menethil stood up to his fellow leaders who were howling for blood and said, 'no. We will not sink to that level. We will not exterminate an entire race of people. We are better than that.'"
And people wonder why I insist he was the greatest leader our generation of heroes ever had.
Dreyja Sep 23rd 2010 6:29PM
I'm glad you adressed these already. I'm commenting to late to do any good.
It helps at this point that even Mr. Cranky-pants-Varian argued to not slaughter the Orcs like Cattle. He was still a very young man at this point and the death of his father and the fall of his city would have been pretty fresh still.
I really don't like the guy but, if we are talking about nuances, I'd like to point out an Alliance leader that has shown some. I also doubt VERY much that he'd advocate the slaugter of non-combatant horde members, even if he'd kinda like to.
Saying again - I don't like him, not even a little. :)
Undra Sep 23rd 2010 12:50PM
He is 'The Most Interesting Orc in the Horde'.
"I don't always drink beer. But when I do, I prefer Drohn's Distillery. Lok'tar ogar, my friends."
Syme Sep 23rd 2010 1:01PM
I have always found Orgrim Doomhammer to be a difficult character to come to grips with. This article advocates a perspective that makes sense. Well written, and I look forward the next installment.
Grovinofdarkhour Sep 23rd 2010 1:47PM
Kudos again, Mr. Rossi. Having never played an orc for more than a few levels (my year-old DK is all of level 64 and about to finally have "the Nagrand experience" - the reason I rolled him in the first place), not long ago I didn't know Orgrim from Grommash. This was an excellent introduction to an unexpectedly fascinating character.
NielsdeJONG Sep 23rd 2010 3:17PM
Nice articel :)
Still, despite his accomplishments, I still hate the guy!
He may have done it "in the best interest of his people" but he was still a person who almost genocided the entire human race, and also almost succeeded in helping whipe out the Draenei!
It's nice that he helped Thrall, but I don't think that wearing the armor and naming a city after, a genocidal maniac is a general good idea.
What do you think would happen to the relations between German and Israel should the germans decide to rename Berlin to "Hitertown"? :P
StClair Sep 23rd 2010 4:11PM
Please.
HitlerBURG.
NielsdeJONG Sep 23rd 2010 6:59PM
That's even better :D