Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-26-2010 @ 7:30PM
Vash said...
Undercutting is the natural order of the economy. Ultimately, there's a finite number of buyers on a given realm. Marking down products easily makes the difference between taking a slight loss on profit and your auction expiring leaving you empty handed.
I just wish people would undercut by significant amounts. Anything less than a gold is dishonest. If you're offering a product and placing it as though it were a better value, at least list a noticeable difference between the previous bidder. I undercut people all the time, but I do so by about 5-10% instead of a few useless copper. What's better for the consumer? "Buy 30 of my items and you can send a letter for the money you saved.", or "Buy 30 of my items and you can pick up a stack of potions for your raid with the money you saved." I know this is just semantics and I know it's utterly futile in the grand scheme of things, but I take pride in the fact that my items are a genuine value yet I still make enough to put the monopoly guy to shame.
Reply