Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-04-2010 @ 10:04PM
roseclown said...
Oh for the love of...
WoW artists, this announcement just in. Girls, they have boobs. Get over it. (also, like hell a forsaken would have that much remaining fat in the chest. -_-)
Reply
10-04-2010 @ 11:16PM
adam_johnson said...
stuffed with teddy bear filling?
10-05-2010 @ 1:02AM
Alchemistmerlin said...
Oh for the love of...
People on the internet that I can not assume the gender of, this announcement just in. Men and lesbians, they like boobs. Get over it. (also, like hell a magical world where cows can talk and walk on water would have any physical rules on the quantity or quality of flesh.)
10-05-2010 @ 1:06AM
Ametrine said...
"Yes, they're real! They're not mine, but they're real!"
10-05-2010 @ 1:11AM
roseclown said...
@Alchemistmerlin
Look, I know you all like boobs. Awesome, I like abs. Mmmm, abs... /trails off in awesome thoughts. Snaps self out.
But here is the thing: I don't concentrate on describing a man's abs in my writing/art to the detriment of the piece. This guy is a awesome artist, but from all the other comments with boobs in it, it shows that his fascination with blatantly sexing it up detracts from the art instead of enhancing it.
Also: I don't make men have unrealistic, monster abs in my art/writing/daydreams. Nor do I spend more time and detail on that then I do their face, emotions, and character development.
So yeah: Boobs, we have them. Stop talking to them instead of to my face. Which is essentially what this art amounts to, with your eyes being drawn to the bazoongas instead of the actual action of the piece.
10-05-2010 @ 1:13AM
roseclown said...
Also,
@ Ametrine
I lol'ed irl. XD
10-05-2010 @ 6:28AM
Eisengel said...
Whoa, now I have to say, in general quite good, but a little off on the sizing and perspective. Sure illustrative technique is important, but perspective and structure of an anatomy is also important. How did that's Orc's axe not manage to slice through his back based on how it joins to the haft? The blade needs to be rotated a bit farther, or the haft moved up his shoulder a bit.
What? I started backwards through the gallery?
*urp!*
/nosebleed