Ghostcrawler: Round 1 of patch 4.0.1 class rebalancing implemented

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

10-14-2010 @ 3:27PM

Kolyarut said...

Do we, though?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to start a lets-flame-GCer rageathon, but wasn't he responsible for overseeing these changes going in in the first place? People have been saying for a very long time "it's hard to say how it'll actually play since the numbers aren't fixed yet" - but I guess it turns out that they were, and now they're going to have to do a rush job on a fix (aside from whether or not you feel the initial 4.0.1 changes were rushed or not, the last set of changes just got put in overnight, there's no way that went through a thorough test cycle...)

Again, the last thing we need to do is all nerdrage at Ghostcrawler, but it's not like it's the first time a class or spec has wound up working poorly despite extensive test time.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.