Ghostcrawler: Round 1 of patch 4.0.1 class rebalancing implemented

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

10-14-2010 @ 3:59PM

Nyold said...

@Kolyarut

I think I have to agree with you here. If the numbers are balanced at 85 and imbalanced at 80 (and by imbalanced I mean GROTESQUELY imbalanced), who knows what other levels are imbalanced? What about a level 30 mage vs a 30 ret pally? And who says that these lower levels are not important? It affects:
1. Lower level BG brackets
2. People's perception at early levels that mage is OP and ret pally is weak, which may lead people to abandon their lowbie alts early on.

With Blizzard's focus on 1-60 leveling experience, balancing numbers only at 85 seems very contradictory with their general philosophy in Cata. If it's only balanced at one level, then something is seriously wrong with either their scaling formula, combat rating formula, or something else... basically, GC, double check your math please.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.