Skip to Content
10-16-2010 @ 4:19AM
This is going to sound emo, and/or like reverse QQing, but I'm a little upset by both this column and a lot of these comments. I've run both ICC and Naxx (weekly) as well as multiple heroics and several dummy tests. As of the time this column went up, warrior DPS had been buffed to be more than adequate. The columns worry me because there are apparently a lot of people speaking out of turn, delivering knee-jerk reactions without testing things for themselves.Per my previous comment, I don't believe that warrior damage will ever top out as high as it did in ICC with ArP capping and gear scaling, but it's not reasonable to expect that. Warrior DPS is now on a par with other hybrid DPS, and Arms and Fury are now both raid-viable. I'm not sure what's left to complain about (from a DPS standpoint of course).Just my $.02 and I'll shut up now.
10-16-2010 @ 4:20AM
The *comments* worry me.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.