Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-16-2010 @ 4:19AM
Hoff said...
This is going to sound emo, and/or like reverse QQing, but I'm a little upset by both this column and a lot of these comments. I've run both ICC and Naxx (weekly) as well as multiple heroics and several dummy tests. As of the time this column went up, warrior DPS had been buffed to be more than adequate. The columns worry me because there are apparently a lot of people speaking out of turn, delivering knee-jerk reactions without testing things for themselves.
Per my previous comment, I don't believe that warrior damage will ever top out as high as it did in ICC with ArP capping and gear scaling, but it's not reasonable to expect that. Warrior DPS is now on a par with other hybrid DPS, and Arms and Fury are now both raid-viable. I'm not sure what's left to complain about (from a DPS standpoint of course).
Just my $.02 and I'll shut up now.
Reply
10-16-2010 @ 4:20AM
Hoff said...
The *comments* worry me.