Encrypted Text: Finding combat's missing damage

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

10-20-2010 @ 5:19PM

james said...

Not too sure how the majority of readers feel about the information provided.

Damage and talent spec scaling has always been a touchy subject to dwell on. But in so far, i fail to see a problem

has anyone forgotten that instant attacks account for a very large proportion of MH attacks?

Procs arent always about the white, auto attacks... Especially when combat rogues have so much energy regen. Put two and two together and I expect that you will see a fairly consistent supply of procs

Also combat rogues now benefit from ambidexterity, so i'm a little confused about how these bonus off-hand attacks will suffer form the off-hand damage penalty.. Unless the bonus 75% weapon damage applies to final weapon damage AFTER the penalty.

In which case it is fairly minor. Aside from the fact that, ideally you will use a fast weapon with a lower damage range - i dont see a problem there.

If procs benefit from combat potency, all the better.

10-20-2010 @ 5:27PM

Chase Christian said...

We're not talking about theoretical damage or future implementations, we're talking about current live damage. It's awful.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.