Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-27-2010 @ 5:51PM
kabshiel said...
It looks good, but Bad Romance was much more fitting.
Reply
10-27-2010 @ 6:09PM
Schadenfreude said...
I was pulling for Bad Romance as well.
10-27-2010 @ 6:09PM
Jay said...
This. I'm no Lady Gaga fan but I must admit some of the dances in Bad Romance were very fitting for the female worgen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrO4YZeyl0I#t=0m50s
10-27-2010 @ 6:33PM
Orkchop said...
Agreed. Bad Romance has much better dancing.
10-27-2010 @ 6:40PM
thebitterfig said...
What I'll say in favor of Lady Gaga is that she [1] actually has a really good sense of fashion and [2] often acts and moves in ways which are constructed to defy traditional notions of femininity. To that end, Poker Face pales before Bad Romance. Not absolutely retched (I'm much more annoyed by the sheer idiocy of male Tauren PBJ Time), but it could have a lot better.
10-27-2010 @ 6:45PM
NekoDaimyo said...
And don't forget, she's a monster.
10-27-2010 @ 9:42PM
Utakata said...
I find Lady Gaga a very fascinating and creative individual, but her music is just awful. :(
10-28-2010 @ 12:31AM
Armath said...
Some Bad Romance moves would have been much better than the Poker Face moves, *especially* the boob/crotch grabs. Gotta wonder if that's gonna interact with the profanity filter, cause it probably should.
On the other hand, this dance choice is so lame that they almost HAVE to be getting ready to release the long-promised dance studios!