BlizzCon 2010: Razer demos the Naga Epic, StarCraft 2 gear, page 2
Before Robert escorted me and Sacco into the press box to check out the Razer Naga Epic, I had never touched a Razer Naga. It intimidated the hell out of me, and I wasn't willing to drop the cash on a mouse with a
number pad on the side. The reviews came in, eventually, and the Naga was firmly in the "good, but an acquired taste" category. All right, I told myself, one day I will get to use one. But not now. So BlizzCon was the first time I had touched a Razer Naga. Like most things in life, it was not as uncomfortable or difficult as some people said. The number of keys your thumb has access to is definitely an acquired taste, but a taste I could see myself becoming accustomed to. Thoughts of Shield Bashes, a row of different mounts and raid target-marking macros danced in my head, potentially all accessible from my thumb.
A disclaimer: My hands are not the biggest hands. They are also not the smallest hands. As with all peripherals, it all comes down to personal satisfaction with a product. The Naga is a contentious device -- people love the button layout or it just doesn't fit for them. This review is from the perspective of my own hands, which you can see in the video, holding both the original and Epic Naga mice.
From what I saw, the Epic features a few improvements, most of them big deals, over the original design. First and foremost is the mouse's ability to change between a wired and wireless mouse, with the same USB cable attaching into the mouse's recharger or straight into the mouse itself. I watched Robert shapeshift the mouse effortlessly. He told me the mouse has the same 1ms response time in wired or wireless mode. That felt nice. Having the ability to go wired in the middle of a raid when your battery is getting low is, hands down, one of the best features of a wireless mouse.

The second big difference is the comfort factor. Many people complained that the original Naga's back row of buttons was barely reachable unless you had some sort of special bionic thumb. You'll see in the video that I tried the original design of the Naga first, and then the Epic version with a larger magnetic side piece attached. While this piece didn't change my grip on the mouse, it did give me the ability to rest the right side of my hand off the mouse slightly, just enough that my thumb had an easier time reaching the back buttons on the side keypad. At the same time, moving my thumb didn't move the mouse. Touching and using the Naga for the first time was a positive experience.
As with most products on the market these days, you can change the glow color on the mouse to practically anything, and the buttons are all re-mappable and configurable. The original Naga has excellent in-game support, so I'm confident the new one will have the same bevy of options.
There is no memory on the mouse to store profiles or anything like that, which is somewhat unfortunate, as I would like to take my keybindings with me. It's not a deal-breaker, however.
Bottom line: I put my money where my mouth is by picking up the keyboard I loved so much. The Naga Epic is probably getting the same treatment. It was responsive, fast, solid and, with a little practice I'm sure, going to become second nature to use. My hand fit on the mouse well and, especially with the new magnetic stability pieces, made using the Naga Epic not feel daunting. The mouse scared me but became demystified once I touched it. I'd recommend finding a store that has a demo of the mouse out, ready to be handled so you know what you're getting into (as with any mouse, really). For me, my hand fits, and a Naga Epic will probably be living on my desk in the near future.






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
niko Oct 28th 2010 6:25PM
"the curvy, voluptuous Naga"
/quickly googles the Naga for pix
don't judge!
Faith Trust Oct 28th 2010 6:28PM
So the epic is bigger than the classic?
Or what is the difference between the two?
On razer's page it says they are about the same size.
I have a classic and I'm wanting to buy a second one for my other computer.
I haven't decided if I want a cataclysm one or the epic, because I haven't found the epic.
And razer wasn't on my local Electronics Game Show
Foxfyr Oct 29th 2010 1:02AM
I have the classic and have pre-ordered the epic. But it doesn't ship until November 29th.
Mohiroism Oct 28th 2010 6:36PM
Only problem with the Naga is that you quickly become dependant on it. I had to raid a few times without it and I felt like I was smacking my face against a wall till I got it back.
/LOVE IT.
Sarley Oct 28th 2010 7:03PM
Gotta agree with you there - I've been healing on my Disc Priest with a Naga for months now and the biggest problem I have is that I wouldn't be able to function without it! I want the Epic now!
Literaltruth Oct 29th 2010 2:07AM
I think this is why I'm gonna get the Naga Epic. Then I can keep my current Naga locked away somewhere and if I have to get the Epic fixed or something I can bust out my old version. The ability not to have to play without a Naga ever is worth the price of the epic alone IMO.
It really is that good.
gboyd Oct 28th 2010 6:43PM
I tried out the Naga for two weeks but just couldn't get it to feel comfortable. The buttons on the side just don't feel memorable and using the trainers they provide was just uncomfortable. Plus, the Razor addon for WoW was incompatible with other addons like Bartender leaving my UI a mess for a while.
Eventually I returned the mouse and picked up a Logitech G700. Over all the G700 was far more comfortable in my hand, still had plenty of buttons to configure, and i found remembering my keybindings a lot easier given the layout of the buttons across the mouse.
That was just my experience with it.
Shinji Oct 28th 2010 10:33PM
So lemme get this right, you were using the Naga addons *and* bartender? Why not just bartender?
gboyd Oct 29th 2010 9:29AM
I had been using Bartender before getting the Naga mouse. I saw that it came with a special addon for the mouse and thought I'd try it. Thats when I learned it wasn't comparable with Bartender. I wanted to give the mouse a fair trial before I decided to keep it or not, so I went with the razor addon for a bit and had a messy UI. I later went back to bartender and fixed my UI and tried the mouse out that way.
It worked fine regardless of which addons I used but it was the mouse itself that I just didn't like.
Laidanyl Oct 28th 2010 6:59PM
I use a Naga, and I love it. There's just one problem.
Ready for this? It's très bizarre, but after my computer has been shut down for a while (i.e., overnight), the Naga mouse doesn't actually work when I turn the computer back on. It just sits there, like a dead snake. To get it to work, I have to fool around with it. Literally! I have to unplug the USB cord, plug it back in. Or sometimes I have to turn the mouse over and move it up and down a bit. Or sometimes I have to flip the Num Pad vs. 123 button on the bottom a bit. Or sometimes I have to do a bit of all of the above in random order. And at some point, my computer will make the NEW DEVICE ding, and then the Naga will work.
Once the Naga's working, if I reboot my computer, it's fine. The mouse works right away. But the moment the computer has been shut down for any extended period of time, the Naga goes dormant. It's so odd! I had no idea snakes hibernated!
junglenutz04 Oct 28th 2010 7:15PM
If there isn't any lighting on the mouse when you turn on the PC, it's probably entered the mode it does for firmware updates and such. You might want to look that info up online and compare it to what's happening to you.
Furiursa Oct 28th 2010 6:59PM
BLEH...
Logitech fo lyfe!
Adakian Oct 28th 2010 7:44PM
I hate logitech....my work uses a logitech wireless keyboard and half the time I spend trying to get the computer to read the keyboard.
Methuus Oct 28th 2010 10:02PM
Well, I thought "never use wireless for gaming" was pretty much an accepted truth. So it's really only fair to compare wired products to wired products.
(I have no idea why peripheral companies keep wasting their time making wireless mice.)
Furiursa Oct 28th 2010 7:01PM
Honestly, every Razer item I've ever bought has turned out to be a massive disappointment. I used to LOVE their stuff, but the last keyboard I bought? Had flaky keys (with a noticeable double-space key issue) and the finish on their stuff is FAR from durable. They're simply not worth the HEFTY pricetag that comes with them. Much like SteelSeries :P
Draknareth Oct 29th 2010 5:44AM
I must say I very much disagree, I've owned the Naga, Lycosa, Carcharias and Exactmat for a year now and they've had daily use. They look good as new, no visible wear and they all work pefectly. Granted the Lycosa gets a little dusty but overall I personally feel that Razer gear is incredibly durable, even when it's being carted back and forth for LAN parties.
The Razer Naga has changed the way I play so completely it's unreal. I had to use someone elses computer to raid at 1 point and I just couldn't play, so the only issue I have with Razer is....... I CAN'T PLAY WITHOUT IT ANYMORE!!!!!
junglenutz04 Oct 28th 2010 7:17PM
I didn't realize the epic was going to have the color options, wish my regular Naga had that. Should go well with the new Anansi keyboard.
Which speaking of that, suprising they didn't have any of those at Blizzcon.
Adakian Oct 28th 2010 7:41PM
The Naga is what got me off of clicking....I shall never be a clicker again thanks to the Naga.
Narzon Oct 28th 2010 7:46PM
Yeah, honestly, Razer products just tend to be more money for more lights/aesthetics. For a gaming headset I'd easily recommend the Logitech G35 or G930 (same thing, but wired/wireless), or a Creative SB Arena. Though Nothing beats a Sennheiser with a nice soundcard.
For keyboards, I'd still say the Logitech G15 is the king in the category. Perfect buttons, good amount of macro keys, nice backlight, and a convenient display. Though, if you have the money and the preference, the Steelseries mechanical keyboard could possibly outshine it.
For a gaming mouse, once again, Logitech is the king, though Razer can make some pretty nice ones. The MX 518 is one of the most popular models to this day, and the similar G500/G7 are very comfortable with nice, accessible buttons. The G9x also looks great, though more for FPS gamers. For Razer, the only two I'd consider would half to be the Deathadder and maybe the Naga for healers.
Sorry if this sounds like a huge logitech advertisement, but I do have a decent amount of experience with gaming peripherals, and based off my own experience and online reviews, these tend to be the best choices for people on the market. I'd never decide my gaming gear based off of a designated booth like this. Everything will seem nice, especially with a company representative reassuring you. The Razer Starcraft II gear especially, doesn't seem to have any real innovation, just the Starcraft brand and a few fancy lights.
Grendalsh Oct 28th 2010 9:28PM
The concept of having more buttons on the mouse isn't bad. It's having them all under the thumb.. and using that as the primary means of input. What's your left hand doing then? ... or maybe I don't wanna know.
That's why I prefer a left hand gamepad (n52te or G13) to the Naga..
I chatted with the Razer reps at BlizzCon and they hinted there's some things in the works for the N52te coming out Soon(tm). Now if they'd just come out with a matched set with a dpad for the left hand and a thumbball for the right hand.. THAT would kick the Naga to the curb.