Know Your Lore: The peculiar tale of the Headless Horseman, page 2

Thomas didn't understand the questioning, and when he questioned why the Crusade was acting without any physical sign of the plague, the explanation was a convoluted affair. The plague first spread through tainted wheat, Thomas was told, but now that this method had been discovered by the Crusade, the Lich King had devised "other methods." The world was littered with "traitors" who had sold their souls to the Lich King for immortality, the Crusade insisted.
Cities bearing refugees from other cities were immediately under suspicion. Villagers that were deemed "too healthy" were obviously in cahoots with the Lich King; otherwise, they would not be healthy. Towns that were deemed as havens from the plague were more than likely deemed such in order to attract more people, so that more people would be available for the Lich King to raise as undead. It all made utter, chilling sense -- why on earth would any village be spared the plague, unless they were somehow being prepared to receive it?

It never occurred to Sir Thomas that he was committing the same kind of murder that Prince Arthas had done when he purged the city of Stratholme so many years before. Sir Thomas Thomson had turned into that which he'd wholeheartedly cried against as unconscionably wrong just four years before.
Two months later, the Scarlet Crusade discovered another pocket of healthy villagers, proclaimed the village to be yet another group that was preparing for being turned to Scourge and ordered the village eliminated. Sir Thomas was at the head of the fray, and a woman and her son fell beneath his blade. The daughter walking with them turned an instant before the fatal blow stuck, staring up at her executioner with terrified eyes -- and Sir Thomas recognized in that split second the eyes of his daughter.

But from his room, instead of the normal sounds of grieving tears shed came strange, inhuman noises. Laughing, howling, sobbing -- all punctuated with strange little rhymes, the sort one heard in fairy tales used to illustrate where, in his life, a man had gone wrong. It was Hallow's End.

And so Dathrohan persuaded Sir Thomas to join the fight against the undead once more, on Hallow's End, in an effort to help Thomas put the mistakes of his past firmly behind him. But as Sir Thomas fought with an almost savage frenzy, slaughtering hundreds of undead, he was nearly overtaken by Scourge. His comrades leapt to defend and assist him -- and that's when they discovered that Sir Thomas wasn't merely overtaken by grief. He turned on them, running them through with his blade as viciously as he murdered the walking corpses that threatened them all.
Sir Thomas Thomson had gone completely mad.

The Scarlet Crusade was forced to take down one of its own, beheading Sir Thomas and taking the once-valiant paladin's body back to the Scarlet Monastery. Grand Crusader Dathrohan said he would prepare the body for burning himself, an honor to the Crusade's fallen comrade. But once again, things were not as they appeared to be. The Grand Crusader was in fact the dreadlord Balnazzar, who had taken over Dathrohan's body years before.Duped for far too long by lies, I see you now through clearer eyes!
Infected all, you too shall fall; the Light to win out through your demise!
I'll make of this land a funeral pyre ... and end your curse with cleansing fire!
The only burning Sir Thomas would feel would be the burning of fel energy, coursing through his body as Balnazzar reanimated the dead paladin's corpse. Balnazzar had taken over the Grand Crusader's body years before and was the real leader of the Scarlet Crusade -- nothing more than a puppet, a facade with which Balnazzar could continue to wreak havoc against the Lich King, against Sylvanas, and against humanity itself.

To this day, the corpse of Sir Thomas rides the skies come Hallow's End, setting buildings ablaze with fires to cleanse his beloved homeland of any possible threat. In life, Sir Thomas trusted those around him without fault, leading to the deaths of his comrades, his beloved mentor Uther, thousands of innocents and at last, his beloved wife and children. In death, Sir Thomas is so maddened that he doesn't even realize he is dead. In death, he desperately continues to fight the Scourge, wherever or whoever it may be -- for who knows when or where it may strike?I fought for you ... I fought in vain.
Now scatter, scurry, shriek in pain!
No mercy on this night abides,
On Hallow's End, when the horseman rides!

And he will not stop until he's put an end to all of you.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.





Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Jamie Oct 31st 2010 6:13PM
Sir Thomas pretty much defines The Scarlett Crusade experience unfortunately.
A paladin blinded by loyalty, but those giving the orders are just using those who can't see how wrong those orders are.
In the end the end its so easy for those who choose the Light can easily become their enemy more than any other archetype in the fantasy universe.
Derbeste Oct 31st 2010 6:27PM
"You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain" -Harvey Dent
It is ironic that heroes have the hardest time enduring to the end....because they have so much more to endure.
Fletcher Oct 31st 2010 6:32PM
"those who choose the Light can easily become their enemy more than any other archetype in the fantasy universe."
I beg to differ. What about those who choose the Shadow? Who turn to the Fel powers? Illidan, Kael'thas, Sylvanas, Arthas ... the number of people who've been led into evil by following the Light pales to insignificance compared to the number of people who've fallen to using unholy energies and been corrupted by it.
George Oct 31st 2010 6:44PM
@Fletcher
One error in your list there: Sylvanas didn't choose darkness. She valiantly defended Quel'dalas against the Scourge, proving to be a persistent bother to Arthas. For her heroism, her soul was unwillingly ripped from her body and twisted into a banshee, denying her the clean death she deserved.
When Arthas' grip on her was severed, she once again fought again the scourge, albeit in a much colder manner. After all, she is undead. She does not possess, and it doesn't pay for her to fake, the emotions and moral code of mortals.
dodgeballer2005 Oct 31st 2010 7:02PM
Arthas was a follower of the Light. Are you dense or something? He was doing the best for the Light and his people. He just cared too much it corrupted him.
Jamie Oct 31st 2010 7:16PM
@Fletcher:
The idea of a holy hero is that they do not share any similarities to their enemies however those who follow the Shadow or Necromancy to their own bidding, in other words; using the enemies' strengths against them, are already like their enemy even if their intentions are originally for good.
Amaxe Oct 31st 2010 8:06PM
Before we get too deep into the finger pointing here, I think we need to be aware of something. The Scarlets are not the representatives of the Light as it is meant to be followed. It is a sect which has subordinated the beliefs in the Light to its desire for revenge. They were corrupted by the idea that the ends justify the means.
This would be no more representative of belief in the Light than an Orcish version which subordinated their views of honor to desires for revenge.
We do have historical counterparts... most notably the Japanese army of the 1930s which turned the ancient code of Bushido into a rather brutal ideology which was pretty far from the original it claimed to derive from.
So, far from "choosing" the Light, the Scarlets have actually spurned it.
Here's an interesting excerpt from the WoW RPG book Dark Factions (p87):
"Heretics of the Holy Light Heretics of the Holy Light
Of the two splinter factions of the Church of the Holy Light — the Argent Dawn and the Scarlet Crusade — the Argent Dawn is by far more palatable to the Church. Still, both technically go against the church’s established teachings to blaze new paths.
The Argent Dawn believes the church’s old methods of dealing with evil no longer suffice. Evil constantly changes and refines its methods, and good must likewise change. The Scarlet Crusade takes this notion one huge step forward. The crusade rationalizes that evil has no restraints on its tactics, and neither should good if it expects to triumph."
TL:DR- The Scarlet Crusade no more represents the Light than the Bonechewer orcs represent the Horde.
Kael Oct 31st 2010 6:21PM
Wow, I didn't know the Headless Horseman had such a cool backstory. What a great article!
raposo02790 Oct 31st 2010 6:22PM
This story deserves to be made into a machinima or something it resonates
Trilynne Oct 31st 2010 6:22PM
Yikes. Makes me feel a bit bad for killing him so many times for his horse. >.>
peon47 Oct 31st 2010 7:45PM
I'd feel worse if the damn horse had ever dropped
Revrant Oct 31st 2010 7:50PM
You shouldn't, he wants you to really, somewhere in there is a tortured man who cannot believe what he's become.
You give his soul peace.
relmatos Oct 31st 2010 7:52PM
Dont. he's evil. he refused to give me the damnable male orc mask so I could get the achievement :(
Paul Oct 31st 2010 6:31PM
It's one of those stories that really makes those mangas worth reading. Even the comparitively weak story about Nesingwary at least give him a bit of character that you just don't get in-game.
arctercon Oct 31st 2010 6:32PM
Kratos.
Eregos ftw! Oct 31st 2010 6:34PM
Fantastic article! I had no idea that HH actually HAD a story behind him, much less one of such heartfelt grief!
trefpoid Oct 31st 2010 6:43PM
Man, now I feel sorry for the guy D: I really like him, I'm gonna miss his screams all across the map.. he just gives the whole Hallow's End event such a cool feeling. His story is really sad though D: and I took his horse! dammit!
Something Oct 31st 2010 7:25PM
Is there any sort of explanation for why he rides a horse? I don't think it mentioned a horse in his living life once.
Jimson Oct 31st 2010 7:39PM
He was a paladin in life.... and a paladin's horse is a pretty significant part of his life. Look at the pally quest line for the charger, Arthas and Invincible, or Tirion and his horse in the story about Eitrigg (can't remember the horse's name but it made a point of noting how faithful it was).
MusedMoose Oct 31st 2010 7:30PM
I can see I wasn't the only one who had no idea there was so much story behind the guy. I kind of feel sorry for him now, despite the atrocities he committed... definitely a tragic hero gone horribly wrong. Thanks for this, I definitely have a new perspective on him now. My DK will still continue to kill him every chance she gets, not only because she believes in redemption (which may only come when he's dead for good), but because she has a deep-seated loathing for the Scarlet Crusade. Note to self: wear the Crusade's tabard next year. ^_^
"Cities bearing refugees from other cities were immediately under suspicion. Villagers that were deemed "too healthy" were obviously in cahoots with the Lich King; otherwise, they would not be healthy. Towns that were deemed as havens from the plague were more than likely deemed such in order to attract more people, so that more people would be available for the Lich King to raise as undead. It all made utter, chilling sense -- why on earth would any village be spared the plague, unless they were somehow being prepared to receive it?"
This is the sort of thinking that scares me, and part of why I hate the Scarlet Crusade so much. There's something wrong with people who will twist anything, no matter how good it is, to fit their paranoid and horrific view of the world. From what I've heard about what happens to the Crusade in Cataclysm, I couldn't be happier about their storyline.