Know Your Lore: The Third War, part 2

A few months back, I started on an overview of the Third War. As you can see from reading it, the following week, I did not in fact talk about the Third War at all. If you're familiar with my Thrall piece for KYL, you understand this is something that happens to me from time to time. I fully intended to go into more details about the war, but I got sidetracked by something shiny or a colorful ball of twine or what have you.
But with Wrath of the Lich King a month from its exit from center stage, it's time to look back again at the war that made it all possible.
After the Culling of Stratholme, Arthas Menethil had taken his first steps into obsession. The Culling itself is often treated as an indefensible act that proves Arthas was already evil, but I personally see it as the first tipping point, when a young and idealistic man who wanted to do right by his people was presented with an untenable choice and let his own impulsive nature decide. Waiting outside the city for the residents to turn into undead and destroying them as they attempted to escape was, after all, neither a more merciful nor a more prudent option. In the end, Arthas made the choice he did, and in so doing alienated both Uther, his direct superior as a paladin (and one who has his father's ear, to boot) and Jaina, his on-again, off-again romance. This left him free to pursue Mal'Ganis to Northrend.
His actions would change the face of Azeroth and her nations forever.
The roof of the world
At the time, not much was known of Northrend by the peoples of the Eastern Kingdoms. There had been some expeditions sent to the forbidding roof of the world, and some small colonies had been settled in its more temperate climes, but it was for the most part a wilderness of harsh climates, hostile cultures and unknown mysteries. It was in the area known to us today as the Dragonblight that young Prince Arthas made landfall and began his preparations to find and destroy Mal'Ganis, the object of his obsession.
Amazingly, his old friend and weapons trainer Muradin Bronzebeard was also in Northrend at the time. I've often wondered how, exactly, Muradin learned of Frostmourne and began to seek it out, since the Lich King had brought the blade with him to Northrend and forced it out of his icy prison in order to use it in his elaborate plan for escape and revenge. Since we know the Lich King always intended Arthas to find the blade, did he whisper its location directly into Muradin's mind?
After helping Muradin against waves of undead that threatened his expedition, Arthas decided to seek out the runeblade the dwarf told him about in order to use its power to destroy Mal'Ganis. So devoted was he to this task that when news from his father in Lordaeron called Arthas' ships back home, he went to extreme lengths to avoid answering his father's summons. Arthas hired mercenaries to burn his own ships, then diverted his angry, homesick soldiers and their justifiable anger onto those self-same mercenaries, who were then killed.
Having successfully trapped his men, Arthas led them against the undead and, with Muradin's help, found the cavern where Frostmourne lay. Defeating an elemental revenant set to guard the blade, Muradin and Arthas read the inscription and learned of the blade's curse, but nothing was beyond Arthas at this point. What the Culling did not destroy in his once idealistic spirit, the betrayal of his own men and his mercenaries had.
So must power scar the spirit
Whomsoever takes up this blade shall wield power eternal. Just as the blade rends flesh, so must power scar the spirit.
This warning, carved beneath the runeblade, proved true. Taking the blade did indeed scar young Arthas Menethil, rendering what remained of the young, eager paladin as cold and dead as the people of Stratholme he'd tried to protect from the curse of undead by destroying them himself, as chill and foreboding as the cavern he'd found the blade in. Leaving Muradin's seemingly lifeless body where it lie (the explosion of the runeblade's icy pedestal smashing the thickheaded dwarf into an unconsciousness so profound that an uncaring Arthas took it for death), the former paladin led his remaining forces against Mal'Ganis. The dreadlord confronted Arthas, believing himself safe because (as he explained) the second Arthas took up the runeblade it had rendered him a soulless servant of the Lich King, prompting him to look within himself to see the Lich King's will.
Sure enough, Arthas was now a slave to Frostmourne and the Lich King. However, the Lich King whispered in his new tool's mind that he should indeed have his vengeance against Mal'Ganis, and the dreadlord was quickly (although as we now know, not permanently) dispatched. Some time after this, Arthas turned Frostmourne on his own men, rendering them lifeless slaves as well. Certain members of his forces like Falric and Marwynn were favored with more autonomy than the vast majority of his forces and retained personality and mind. Most did not.
Arthas then returned to Lordaeron, months after he had left it as a driven, obsessed but still fundamentally noble person who wanted the best for his land and people. Slaughtering his aged father, King Terenas Menethil, with Frostmourne, he assumed the throne of a nation soon to cease its existence.
Under its new king, Lordaeron became a nation of corpses and victims, and although many did flee to safety in the south, those who did not escape the regions today known as Tirisfal Glades and the Plaguelands were either slain and converted or trapped in enclaves like Tyr's Hand. Madness, walking in the form of Arthas, had claimed the land and dredged its gaping graves for undead fodder.
But murdering his father and his nation was only the beginning. In order to carry out his master's plans, Arthas would have to claim the urn containing his father's ashes, and to do that, he would have to murder Uther the Lightbringer himself. He did both. He then marched his horrific armies north through the Eversong Woods, through the ancient elfgates defending the city of Quel'Thalas and right to the Sunwell itself, despite the heroic resistance of high elven heroes like Sylvanas Windrunner, the Ranger General of SIlvermoon. Sylvanas herself, for her efforts, was taken captive by the death knight fratricide, who tortured her for daring to stand against him and ripped her spirit from her body to linger in undeath as a banshee.
Arthas struck down Anasterian Sunstrider, the King of Quel'thalas, and brought the remains of the fallen necromancer Kel'Thuzad to the Sunwell itself. He hurled them into the font of magic for the high elves, utterly befouling and destroying it in the process of raiding the necromancer as a lich. In so doing, Arthas had by this point destroyed two of the most ancient nations in the Eastern Kingdoms -- but all of this was merely a warm-up. The true danger was yet to come, as the purpose of the raising of the Scourge and the creation of the Lich King was at hand.
The death knight and lich led their undead forces to Dalaran, the magical city of the Kirin Tor. Despite the best efforts of the most powerful mages the continent had to offer, they seized the Book of Medivh and used its magical secrets to tear open a portal potent enough for Archimonde the Defiler to step bodily onto Azeroth again -- the first time the Legion was able to enter the world in force in over 10,000 years.
The Defiler returns
Let this scar signify the first blow against the mortal world
From this seal shall arise the doom of men, who, in their arrogance, sought to wield our fire as their own.
Blindly they build their kingdoms upon stolen knowledge and conceit.
Now they shall be consumed by the very flame they sought to control.
Let the echoes of doom resound across this wretched world, that all who live may hear them and despair.
From this seal shall arise the doom of men, who, in their arrogance, sought to wield our fire as their own.
Blindly they build their kingdoms upon stolen knowledge and conceit.
Now they shall be consumed by the very flame they sought to control.
Let the echoes of doom resound across this wretched world, that all who live may hear them and despair.
Archimonde's arrival left the Scourge in somewhat of a position of playing second fiddle. The Defiler quickly moved to appoint trusted Legion dreadlord Tichondrius to oversee their corpse army and declared no further need for the Lich King, even as Kel'Thuzad warned Arthas not to trust them. The Lich King had seen it coming; his death and rebirth at the hands of Kil'jaeden had removed any blinders the former shaman Ner'zhul had about the Legion and their habitual betrayals. Indeed, the perfidy of the Legion was exactly what the Lich King had hoped for, as it rendered Kel'Thuzad and Arthas free agents, no longer part of the general Scourge forces under the demons' control.
Knowing of the existence of Kalimdor and the ultimate plan of the Defiler to destroy the night elves who had balked the first demonic invasion of the world of Azeroth 10 millennia before, the Lich King sent Arthas to find and push over the one domino that would lead to the Legion's defeat.
Next time in Know Your Lore: the clash of orc and night elf, the command of the prophet, the ascent up the slopes of Mount Hyjal of armies of the Legion, and the Defiler's ultimate fate. I'm busily taking all the exciting shiny things out of my workspace even now to prepare.
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Lore, Know your Lore






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Blayze Nov 3rd 2010 7:15PM
Two things:
First, why do the Kirin Tor bother to keep rebuilding Dalaran? The insurance premium must be insane.
Second, why are Uther and Jaina still hailed as heroes? At Stratholme, they abandoned a city of innocent civilians to their fates and ran away rather than make a difficult decision. They didn't bother helping Arthas. They didn't bother trying to save the townspeople at all. They left Arthas to the Scourge's mercy--and left the townspeople to his.
These are not qualities I would like in a leader. What happens the first time Jaina is forced to make a difficult decision regarding Theramore? Is she just going to run away so she can maintain her status as a "good person" and a "hero"?
Faith Trust Nov 3rd 2010 7:26PM
No, she lets others kill her father.
Felix_rew Nov 3rd 2010 7:28PM
Because Arthas would've have killed them both, or attempted to, if they tried to intervene. And Artgas stripped Uther of his power, so he couldn't command the army to stop Arthas and this few that went to purge Stratlholme.
Also I wouldn't say the purging if Stratlholme was done because he was evil, he did it for a because he believed it was right, and itnay well have been, if he didn't purge Stratlholme then the Scourge would have gained a huge advantage in that region, and could've marched the Scourge if Stratlholne straight to Lordaeron.
Dreyja Nov 3rd 2010 7:33PM
Sorry but that's just one view of that event. To many of us, the fact that they stood up to Arthas that day WAS an act of heroism. Why the bronze flight retcon about this is that it had to happen, it's also an act that forever set Artha's feet on the road to evil.
I think they both did the right thing there but I know there are those that disagree. Jaina is still the biggest hero we have in the Alliance, by my reckoning. /shrug :)
razion Nov 3rd 2010 7:34PM
Well, first of all: the city is magical. It was made my mages. Recreating one wouldn't take much more than the wave of a hand from one of the higher members of the Kirin Tor.
Second, Uther and Jaina made the harder choice. They walked the path least traveled upon. It was EASY for Arthas to go into Stratholme and slaughter all the citizens instead of trying to search for an alternate solution to the plague--but he didn't. They tried to save Stratholme, just in a, erm, more HUMANE way as opposed to mass GENOCIDE.
Jaina has and does make very difficult decisions for her people--for freedom, the good fight. She had prevented whole-out war between various Horde and Alliance outposts. I'd call that fairly heroic.
Blayze Nov 3rd 2010 7:40PM
The easy choice was to walk away and let someone else make the difficult decisions, which was what they did--as opposed to, at the very least, dealing with the Scourge occupying the city and using it as a mook factory.
Arthas chose to strike as soon as possible, before the citizens bolstered the Scourge forces. Had he waited until they were undead--and therefore, I presume, morally okay to slaughter--his forces would have suffered more deaths than they did.
Uther and Jaina didn't even try to help the townspeople. That they chose to walk away rather than defend those who needed defending--oh hey there Mr. Paladin--is proof of their cowardice.
razion Nov 3rd 2010 7:56PM
They did choose to try and deal with the Scourge in their own way--but, again, just in a different manner (that being not mass genocide on a doomed people). Unfortunately for Jaina and Uther, they could not find a proper solution in such a short amount of time to the problem, as Arthas was simply had to charge in, do the bad deed, and finish it, leaving no chance for the duo to go about an alternate solution.
Arthas didn't go with Jaina and Uther. He didn't turn around, he went on and just killed the townsfolk as they stood there, in Stratholme. Down to the last women, the last child, the last man. In the words of his lieutenants in the Halls of Reflection:
"Men. Women. And CHILDREN. None were spared the master's wrath..."
Again, while Jaina and Uther did leave Stratholme, they did so in disgust of Arthas and what he proposed (mass genocide). Jaina couldn't stand to watch Arthas kill so many people (it's genocide) and Uther wouldn't have it, either (genocide is bad, kids). They left to take care of the plague in a different way (not mass genocide). Arthas just got to the townsfolk too quickly--and, yes, committed mass genocide.
Faust Nov 3rd 2010 8:06PM
Eh. I admit my bias now by saying that I am a Horde through and through. That being said...
Jaina, while being a powerful magic user, is essentially just a young girl. She was given three options: fight and possibly kill the man she might love, help him destroy a city of innocent people, or walk away. While admittedly more mature than most I can understand her decision. Since then she willingly didn't side with her father mindlessly against the Horde, instead choosing the more difficult path and letting her father die. Again, I admit my bias towards the Horde, but this says to me that she learned her lesson about hard choices and walking away.
Uther, on the other hand, knew war. He knows death and destruction. He also is a PALADIN. His student is about to slaughter a town of people and he walks off. That is really pretty awful and honestly not a very great option for someone who was the first Knight of the Silver Hand. The right thing for Uther to do, not as a knight of the realm but as a Paladin of the Holy Light, is knock Arthas out, drag him back, and figure out what the bejeezus is wrong with the kid. I'm not sure how strong Arthas was as a Paladin but I'll bet not as strong as Uther, especially since the Prince was in the middle of one very bad fall. I mostly respect Uther, quite a bit actually, but this one act is a cheap and easy way out. Yes he winds up paying for it with his life which is really all he had left to give at this point but he, through inaction, allowed the Scourge to bring about an invasion by the Burning Legion, the defilement of the Sunwell, and the destruction of the World Tree.
Between Jaina and Uther they should have had no problem disabling Arthas until someone could find a better way. Yes, the army might have gotten more demoralized than it already was but walking away didn't work so well for that either.
Personally I hold the first official Paladin, leader of the Knights of the Silver Hand, and all around good guy a lot more responsible than the little girl who finally grew up afterward.
PS Right up until the Kirin Tor moved Dalaran up to Northrend I would have said it had a mystical significance where it was and could not be moved. Now...I guess mages just incinerate any insurance people who come to call. Or turn them into sheep. Who knows?
razion Nov 3rd 2010 8:37PM
The comment on Uther is fairly curious. As Arthas puts it, by the soverignty of his crown that he relieves Uther and his Paladins from service.
Uther could very well have believed that Arthas had the power to take away the Light from him and his men--although his concept, is, of course, completely ludicrous. As has been shown on other accounts, the Light is proportionate in the weilders belief in their ability to use it.
The Light is not a tangible thing you can take from a person, although I certainly wouldn't put it past Uther to think this was the very case. After all, the Light was a fairly new concept, him being one of the first Paladins--EVER.
It does seem out-of-character for Uther to not have directly tried to stop Arthas, although I could see why that would have been a problem for him--both the faith conflict, and also the fact that Arthas was a close friend of him... coupled with various other factors I'm sure I'm forgetting.
Warcraft, is, of course, a changing world, with changing characters in an ever-changing environment. I wouldn't call it far-fetched to think Uther just had a lapse in judgment (pun not intended).
A_V Nov 3rd 2010 11:47PM
It takes more courage to stand up in the face of death and defy it than waggle your finger, say "Oh, you bad boy!" and turn tail and flee. An orc would have stood to his (inevitable) death and faced Arthas dwn.
/shrug
Al Nov 4th 2010 12:49AM
In all of Jaina's studying, she never came across a variant of the "Evil triumphs when good men do nothing" idea. Uther just has a weird sliding scale of morality, in which letting one Orc live is grounds for imprisonment, followed by exile, but slaughtering a town is fine if he doesn't have to watch.
spydude113 Nov 8th 2010 11:19PM
I think that both Jaina and Uther were unable to do anything at the point other than walk away. Jaina has pretty much no real political standing, and Uther just had his rights taken away. They couldn't really stand up to Arthas, as he had extremely loyal soldiers who were willing to kill innocent civilians on his behalf. In Jaina and Uther's point of view, they either had to fight their people by killing innocent, infected civilians, fight their people by killing loyal soldiers, or walk away. This is more of their moral choice, as uther is a Paladin and wants to protect the innocent, but he can't because the innocent would turn against him, and Jaina is just the kind of person who tries to save as much people as possible.
Orrine Nov 4th 2010 3:15AM
And how exactly could Jaina and Uther help to citizens of Stratholme, who was plagued?
RavenJet Nov 4th 2010 6:37AM
Razion: while I agree with what you said, the department of redundancy department has asked me to point out that "mass genocide" is rather a silly tautology. The definition of genocide already implies a mass of victims.
In fact, technically one could say "mass genocide" would only apply when you're committing multiple genocides - which Arthas wouldn't really aspire to for a while yet...
:P
Eisengel Nov 4th 2010 7:08AM
In my view both Jania and Uther are just as guilty of the slaughter as Arthas. They both were there, had a strong suspicion of what he was going to do, had legal, religious and command responsibility to those people in the town, but chose to abrogate those responsibilities and allow Arthas free reign. Their crimes are crimes of inaction.
In the US there are crimes of inaction. For instance if you see someone drowning and do not attempt to help them (and they die), or if you block an ambulance's path (and someone dies as a result) you can be charged with manslaughter. Your inaction or carelessness directly resulted or materially contributed to the death of someone. This is very much the type of argument used to prosecute Charlie Manson, who never raised a hand against anyone he /caused/ to be killed.
While I can cut Jaina some slack, there is no reason Uther should have walked away. Putting entirely aside his religious obligations as a Paladin, he had a military obligation. There are rules to warfare and the treatment of civilians in war- and peacetime. If an officer suggests killing a civilian for no good reason, you are obliged to remind them of the UCMJ and the current rules of land warfare. If they do indeed directly kill a civilian (non-uniformed non-combatant) who is not posing an immediate threat or immediately contributing materially to an ongoing threat/engagement, it is your responsibility to relieve them of their weapon and keep them under confinement.
Now, those are the rules that are agreed on in a nice office far away from the actual battlefield. Things happen - you have to use your best judgment on what to do when. At the time though, Arthas pretty much stated 'I really want to do this', both Jaina and Uther disagreed, Arthas pulled rank in some odd fashion (by his FUTURE right as king... i.e. he didn't have the authority at the time), and they both allowed him to do it. There was no immediate threat, no battle, no confusion. Their knowing and willing indifference was tacit approval - they were his accomplices. Their duty at that time was to protect those people. If that included forcibly disarming and arresting Arthas, then that is what they should have done; not walked away to leave them to their fate.
Yes, yes. I know, it's a game (hey, we're talking about Undead and Paladins), but I found the whole thing very unrealistic. If Jaina and Uther weren't there and it was just Arthas and his subordinates, I could see that happening.
I'm glad to see though that Jaina has moved from 'you should not, but I won't stop you' to 'you will not - and I won't let you' after the retaking of Undercity/Wrathgate event. As a character, she needs to grow some teeth and do a few things other than lecturing on proper behavior.
Ryan Nov 4th 2010 8:29AM
This conversation and the many points of view is testament to the story crafters @ Blizzard. Right vs. Wrong is always subjective. The Culling Of Stratholme is just that.
Daedalus Nov 4th 2010 8:30AM
There's a few problems with the idea that Uther and Jaina could have somehow stopped Arthas.
First off, killing Arthas would have done nothing. There were soldiers there that were loyal to him, and would have defended him. How many innocent men would have died in that fight? Uther and Jaina were saying Arthas didn’t have the right to decide who lives and who dies; how much hypocrisy would there be in their deciding to kill any soldier that would follow Arthas? Even if they’d have managed to kill Arthas, would that have changed anything? The soldiers had their orders; they may well have carried them out even without Arthas. Should Uther and Jaina have killed all of them? (Now, I know the inevitable comparison that’s going to be drawn is with Nazi soldiers following illegal and immoral orders. However, it’s important to note that the Nazi soldiers who were prosecuted were only those that followed orders that no reasonable person could accept as lawful. Arthas’ men don’t fit that criterion; they’d seen men, women and children turn into vicious monsters, and they knew that if Stratholme fell, thousands of innocent people in the surrounding area would die. If it’s possible for us, knowing all the facts, to still debate whether or not Arthas was doing what was necessary, it must be the case that his soldiers could have reasonably believed that they were doing what was necessary.)
So, they couldn’t just kill him. What other options did they have? Jaina had no authority to command anyone. Antonidas sent her as an advisor; she couldn’t order anyone to stand down. The men had just seen Uther stripped of his rank; as Crown Prince, that was totally within Arthas’ power. To have followed Uther would have been treason. Even so, a handful of men DID commit treason by going with Uther; specifically, the other paladins. Now, Uther could have denied Arthas’ authority, and used the handful of men who followed him to try and stop Arthas. However, they’d have been hopelessly outnumbered; he could perhaps make such a sacrifice for himself, but could he really ask that of his men? Ask them to fight and kill their comrades-in-arms, knowing that they couldn’t win, and that the outcome would be the same? No, all Uther could do would be to lead those that would follow him back to regroup and keep them from dishonoring themselves in Stratholme.
So, I think the idea that Uther or Jaina could have done something to stop Arthas is a bit of a stretch; at best, they could have made a pointless symbolic sacrifice that would have cost more innocent lives without changing anything. Instead, they tried to convince as many as would follow them to leave Arthas behind; under the circumstances, I think that was the best they could do.
Pyromelter Nov 4th 2010 12:30PM
The way I see Stratholme is that it was Uther's one big failure in life. Had Uther supported arthas' decision (which really was the best of a lot of bad choices), he may have been able to contain arthas' anger and prevented him from becoming the vindictive, evil person he eventually became.
What Arthas did is no different than what heroes in movies do to save people from becoming zombies of their own. Examples would include Picard killing his own crew member after being infected by Borg nano probes in First Contact, and Mal killing that hanger on before Reavers could change him in Serenity. They are merciful acts to spare people the pain and torture of an unholy existence. In both of those movies, other characters question the wisdom of killing someone instead of trying to save them. In both cases, the captain was right, and made the tough decision to go through with it.
In the end, Uther failed not just Arthas, but all of Lordaeron and Azeroth with his decision to contradict Arthas at Stratholme. He was a great paladin that made a terrible mistake by being not supporting that very difficult decision.
Reis Nov 5th 2010 3:32AM
The way the lore portrays it, there is no genocide or murder in Stratholme. They were already dead, they just didn't know it yet. I'm a loud and proud Nelf and soon-to-be Worgen :), but Jaina and Uther abandoned Arthas. Was it easy or fun for Arthas, no, but was it necessary, yes. Even the Bronze dragons say as much. The real change in Arthas was what the other two did in leaving. Stratholme didn't change him because of the killing the proto-zombies (even if some were temporarily young or female), but because his closest friends and allies, his mentor and his sweetheart (kinda), were unwilling to find a better way to really help Arthas. You may not emotionally like what Arthas had to do, but that does not make it any less necessary. It certainly does not make it wrong.
On another note, it seems to me that Uther and Jaina were cast as heroes before the Culling was ever conceived; even in Vanilla they have always had that aura about them. This event is perhaps the only (so far as I know) testimony from their past that would besmirch that aura. While I find their abandonment reprehensible I also realize this is an event that happened long ago, and while Uther did not live too much longer, it is obvious that this created a scar upon the person and psyche of Jaina that exists today. Look at the Battle for Undercity. Instead of running away, she takes action. While I would not mind seeing the Horde taken down a peg or two :), I realize that Thrall is probably our best hope for a future where both factions are moving toward peace. She learned from her mistakes and grew to be a better person. That is why I can still consider her a hero.
themann1086 Nov 3rd 2010 7:19PM
One of my favorite quotes is Uther defending the urn: "The urn holds your father's ashes, Arthas! What, were you hoping to piss on them one last time before you left his kingdom to rot?" And Arthas' amused "I didn't know what they held... nor does it matter" response... awesome.