Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-12-2010 @ 12:14PM
Danghor said...
Personally, I think if WoW went free-to-play, I'd just spend the $15/month I usually do on the new options. BUT, what I'm adamant about, is that Blizz should pick a model and stick with it. If you're going to be a subscription-based game, don't exploit us with microtransactions as well. ...Really the only ones I have a problem with are the in-game items. Those should be covered by the subscription. Extra services such as transfers I don't mind being extra (maybe just cuz I've never had a need for them). Someone mentioned an example of 1 free transfer/year which I could see being covered by subscription, but the in-game items erk me the most.
Reply