Blood Sport: Cataclysm PvP is theoretically awesome
by C. Christian Moore 
Nov 16th 2010 at 2:00PM
Every week, WoW Insider brings you Blood Sport for arena enthusiasts and The Art of War(craft) for fans of battlegrounds and world PvP. Want to crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women? C. Christian Moore, multiple rank 1 gladiator, examines the latest arena strategy, trends, compositions and more.
Listening Music: José González's "Hand on Your Heart." One of my favorites.
Vanilla WoW PvP was very fun, even if the top raiders on the server had enough gear to kill you in a global or two. The speed of combat got progressively faster before The Burning Crusade came on scene; a full tier 3 player could change the tide of a battleground by himself easily. Resilience was added to the game to slow down the game -- and it worked! Arena games in The Burning Crusade took a long time to complete, but they were interesting and definitely had depth, even if they made you miss dinner once or twice.
Wrath of the Lich King revamped arena completely by emphasizing burst kills and huge crits. In Season 5, death knights and holy paladins were the best classes in the game because they could sustain damage for periods of time longer than 20 seconds. It was shellshock for arena players everywhere. The 30-minute games we had come to know and love were a thing of the past. Damage was king, and the law was a quick death.
Cataclysm appears to be returning to a Burning Crusade era of controlled arena matches. Giant crits and powerful damage combos are unlikely to be making an exit from arena, but their grip on PvP will be loosened when Deathwing's presence is felt.
Increasing health pools
Similarly to what happened in The Burning Crusade, health pools are inflating like crazy. If you've ever tried to kill a fully stamina-geared player, you'll quickly realize that size matters. A big health pool is awesome for staying alive, and Cataclysm is giving us lots of room to work with. Who knew five levels would be enough to quadruple (or more) my life total?
Increasing HP is crucial for PvP. Battles should feel interesting, and in depth, you should understand why you died instead of going from 100 percent to 0 percent with little to no interaction with the opposing team. A game-ending mistake shouldn't be, "I strafed too far left of our pillar." Bravo for the giant HP change, which I assume is largely because of the bursty nature of Wrath PvP.
Decreasing damage
While health pools are rising, it doesn't necessarily mean that balance is completely awesome. Before the most recent damage nerf, I've heard reports of calculations that offensive stats are getting a bigger upgrade (in proportion) to health pools! That is, even though we might have 100k health at level 85, our abilities might scale to hit for 80,000 damage each (obvious hyperbole here; don't take these as exact numbers). That would be a pretty big problem.
Apparently the memo got to Blizzard, and we've received an awesome around-the-board damage nerf to compensate. I've listed warlock changes below for reference, although all classes experienced a hefty nerf on their damage sticks. Hooray!
Blizzard Entertainment
The new and improved resilience
Resilience is changing a good deal in Cataclysm. Developers have hinted that it will be more important than ever, and changes to increase its effectiveness in PvP encounters reflect that. If resilience were a stock, I would be buying like crazy.
However, a new change to resilience makes it far more exciting: Resilience no longer reduces the chance that you will be critically hit. This new change is awesome. For eight seasons, arena players have been shy to choose a specialization that emphasizes heavy crit chance. If your crit chance is 30 percent, but an enemy player's resilience reduces that to 20 percent, your spec lost a lot of its gusto, and that's only with 10 percent chance gone!
Now, players can experiment freely with different kinds of specs. Perhaps fire mages will finally have their day in arena, or an awesome rogue build that picks up tons of crit! The exciting possibilities are endless!
A cataclysmic healing nerf
Increasing health pools and decreasing damage lends itself to an interesting problem: If heals are too powerful, no one will ever die until mana runs out. This, of course, was the big issue with The Burning Crusade's arena PvP.
Restoration druids were largely dominant in later seasons because of the efficiency of their HoTs. Cyclone was also exceedingly helpful because you were able to cyclone enemies so their healers couldn't get any heals through (and so their HoTs would fall off). Kind of sad, when you think about it.
Cataclysm looks to remedy this problem by nerfing healing to the ground. Bravo! While I'm sure Blizzard developers won't have everything balanced perfectly the first time around, the theory behind the changes is absolutely correct.
Class impact
Due to the nature of different abilities and playstyles associated with specializations, certain classes are bound to thrive in the new environment while others have some catching up to do.
Historically, classes that have infinite energy mechanics and efficient heals do well in low-burst environments. Restoration druids, affliction warlocks, rogues, and warriors are all prime examples of this subset of arena theory in action.
In high-burst environments, classes that can put out a large amount of damage, survive through it, or help their team survive through an enemy team's burst are powerful in these times. Holy paladins, death knights, and burst-spec DPS casters are all pretty awesome when it comes to this kind of arena play.
Cataclysm is shaping up to be a mixture of the two subsets. My personal prediction is classes will be far more balanced at the start of the expansion in comparison to the other two we've seen. Season 9 will most likely have a large variety of team compositions and a balanced SK-100 (at least, balanced compared to 40 percent Season 1 paladin/warrior and 60 percent Season 5 paladin/death knight).
As the seasons pass, we'll likely see even greater class balance come into the equation not only for arenas, but also battlegrounds. I've spoken in articles past why battleground balance will likely impact arena balance for the better, and I'm sticking to those guns. Rated battlegrounds are one of the best things that could happen for rated arena from a balance perspective.
Overall, I am ridiculously excited to PvP in Cataclysm -- far more than I was for The Burning Crusade or Wrath of the Lich King. I hope I won't be disappointed, but somehow I doubt that with all the wonderful changes Blizzard has been applying to PvP. (If you wanted me to talk about PvP gear restrictions on arena, that might be next week -- stay tuned!)
Want to ascend the arena ladders faster than a fireman playing Donkey Kong? Read Blood Sport for pointers on arena play. Don't miss our interviews with successful arena PvPers, and see The Art of War(craft) for the inside line on battlegrounds and world PvP.
Listening Music: José González's "Hand on Your Heart." One of my favorites.
Vanilla WoW PvP was very fun, even if the top raiders on the server had enough gear to kill you in a global or two. The speed of combat got progressively faster before The Burning Crusade came on scene; a full tier 3 player could change the tide of a battleground by himself easily. Resilience was added to the game to slow down the game -- and it worked! Arena games in The Burning Crusade took a long time to complete, but they were interesting and definitely had depth, even if they made you miss dinner once or twice.
Wrath of the Lich King revamped arena completely by emphasizing burst kills and huge crits. In Season 5, death knights and holy paladins were the best classes in the game because they could sustain damage for periods of time longer than 20 seconds. It was shellshock for arena players everywhere. The 30-minute games we had come to know and love were a thing of the past. Damage was king, and the law was a quick death.
Cataclysm appears to be returning to a Burning Crusade era of controlled arena matches. Giant crits and powerful damage combos are unlikely to be making an exit from arena, but their grip on PvP will be loosened when Deathwing's presence is felt.
Increasing health pools
Similarly to what happened in The Burning Crusade, health pools are inflating like crazy. If you've ever tried to kill a fully stamina-geared player, you'll quickly realize that size matters. A big health pool is awesome for staying alive, and Cataclysm is giving us lots of room to work with. Who knew five levels would be enough to quadruple (or more) my life total?
Increasing HP is crucial for PvP. Battles should feel interesting, and in depth, you should understand why you died instead of going from 100 percent to 0 percent with little to no interaction with the opposing team. A game-ending mistake shouldn't be, "I strafed too far left of our pillar." Bravo for the giant HP change, which I assume is largely because of the bursty nature of Wrath PvP.
Decreasing damage
While health pools are rising, it doesn't necessarily mean that balance is completely awesome. Before the most recent damage nerf, I've heard reports of calculations that offensive stats are getting a bigger upgrade (in proportion) to health pools! That is, even though we might have 100k health at level 85, our abilities might scale to hit for 80,000 damage each (obvious hyperbole here; don't take these as exact numbers). That would be a pretty big problem.
Apparently the memo got to Blizzard, and we've received an awesome around-the-board damage nerf to compensate. I've listed warlock changes below for reference, although all classes experienced a hefty nerf on their damage sticks. Hooray!
Blizzard EntertainmentWarlock (Forums / Cataclysm Talent Calculator / Beta Skills/Talents)
Affliction
Demonology
Destruction
Affliction
- Bane of Doom base damage has been reduced by 12%, from 2213 to 1948.
- Bane of Agony base damage has been reduced by 12%, from 1743 to 1535.
- Drain Soul base damage has been reduced by 12%, from 437 to 384.
- Drain Life base damage has been reduced by 12%, from 125 to 109.
- Corruption base damage has been reduced by 12%, from 1004 to 883.
- Jinx now affects up to 15 nearby targets.
Demonology
- Hand of Gul'dan base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 1597 - 1886 ] to [ 1405 - 1660 ]
Destruction
- Chaos Bolt base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 1490 - 1893 ] to [ 1311 - 1665 ]
- Shadowburn base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 737 - 823 ] to [ 649 - 724 ]
- Fel Flame base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 251 - 291 ] to [ 220 - 256 ]
- Shadowflame cooldown has been changed to 12 sec, down from 25 sec.
- Incinerate base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 579 - 673 ] to [ 510 - 592 ]
- Soul Fire base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 2468 - 3094 ] to [ 2171 - 2722 ].
- Searing Pain base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 322 - 382 ] to [ 283 - 336 ].
- Immolate base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 756 + 2401 over 15 sec ] to [ 665 + 2112 over 15 sec ].
- Shadow Bolt base damage has been reduced by 12%, from [ 640 to 714 ] to [ 563 to 629 ].
The new and improved resilience
Resilience is changing a good deal in Cataclysm. Developers have hinted that it will be more important than ever, and changes to increase its effectiveness in PvP encounters reflect that. If resilience were a stock, I would be buying like crazy.
However, a new change to resilience makes it far more exciting: Resilience no longer reduces the chance that you will be critically hit. This new change is awesome. For eight seasons, arena players have been shy to choose a specialization that emphasizes heavy crit chance. If your crit chance is 30 percent, but an enemy player's resilience reduces that to 20 percent, your spec lost a lot of its gusto, and that's only with 10 percent chance gone!
Now, players can experiment freely with different kinds of specs. Perhaps fire mages will finally have their day in arena, or an awesome rogue build that picks up tons of crit! The exciting possibilities are endless!
A cataclysmic healing nerf
Increasing health pools and decreasing damage lends itself to an interesting problem: If heals are too powerful, no one will ever die until mana runs out. This, of course, was the big issue with The Burning Crusade's arena PvP.
Restoration druids were largely dominant in later seasons because of the efficiency of their HoTs. Cyclone was also exceedingly helpful because you were able to cyclone enemies so their healers couldn't get any heals through (and so their HoTs would fall off). Kind of sad, when you think about it.
Cataclysm looks to remedy this problem by nerfing healing to the ground. Bravo! While I'm sure Blizzard developers won't have everything balanced perfectly the first time around, the theory behind the changes is absolutely correct.
Class impact
Due to the nature of different abilities and playstyles associated with specializations, certain classes are bound to thrive in the new environment while others have some catching up to do.
Historically, classes that have infinite energy mechanics and efficient heals do well in low-burst environments. Restoration druids, affliction warlocks, rogues, and warriors are all prime examples of this subset of arena theory in action.
In high-burst environments, classes that can put out a large amount of damage, survive through it, or help their team survive through an enemy team's burst are powerful in these times. Holy paladins, death knights, and burst-spec DPS casters are all pretty awesome when it comes to this kind of arena play.
Cataclysm is shaping up to be a mixture of the two subsets. My personal prediction is classes will be far more balanced at the start of the expansion in comparison to the other two we've seen. Season 9 will most likely have a large variety of team compositions and a balanced SK-100 (at least, balanced compared to 40 percent Season 1 paladin/warrior and 60 percent Season 5 paladin/death knight).
As the seasons pass, we'll likely see even greater class balance come into the equation not only for arenas, but also battlegrounds. I've spoken in articles past why battleground balance will likely impact arena balance for the better, and I'm sticking to those guns. Rated battlegrounds are one of the best things that could happen for rated arena from a balance perspective.
Overall, I am ridiculously excited to PvP in Cataclysm -- far more than I was for The Burning Crusade or Wrath of the Lich King. I hope I won't be disappointed, but somehow I doubt that with all the wonderful changes Blizzard has been applying to PvP. (If you wanted me to talk about PvP gear restrictions on arena, that might be next week -- stay tuned!)
Want to ascend the arena ladders faster than a fireman playing Donkey Kong? Read Blood Sport for pointers on arena play. Don't miss our interviews with successful arena PvPers, and see The Art of War(craft) for the inside line on battlegrounds and world PvP.Filed under: PvP, Blood Sport (Arena PvP), Cataclysm
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Lloren Nov 16th 2010 2:45PM
Yay for PvP getting PvE nerfed HOORAY!!! Those of us that don't PvP rejoice! Nerf healing MOAR!!! I hate it when I'm capable of healing a normal 5 man without a mana break every 30 seconds. Those mana breaks are my LIFE!!!
thefool Nov 16th 2010 3:08PM
Go heal that 5 man in level appropriate gear and then we'll talk.
I remember having to sit down and drink occasionally at the beginning of Wrath. Sure, those 10 seconds were not the greatest part of the instance. However, I wouldn't say running through them in T10 and lolaoe'ing everything isn't all that great either.
Anyways, the changes to the healing game weren't solely based on PvP balance. Those changes (as well as the increased health pools) were to slow down all aspects of the game so that people don't die in 2 hits.
Khasm Nov 16th 2010 3:10PM
The "nerfs" to mana pools and heal amount relative to total health was just as needed in PVE. PVP definitely wasn't the main reason. Stop crying.
Finnicks Nov 16th 2010 3:10PM
I don't think it will be a problem.
Nerf damage output and healing output a little to make PvP less bursty. Reduce mob damage and health to compensate. No net impact on PvE.
As long as you're killing bosses, what's the difference between a 30k crit against a boss with 30 million health and a 50k crit against a boss with 50 million health?
Only the fact that 50k makes your nerdgasm a little more. I'm sorry, but when Blizzard starts balancing the game around "people expect to see bigger numberz nao, 30k iz not enuffz", is the day I quit the game.
Finnicks Nov 16th 2010 3:12PM
Balance wise, it's a non-issue.
Nerf damage output and healing output to make PvP less bursty. Lower boss damage and health to compensate. No net impact on PvE.
Honestly what's the difference between critting for 30k on a boss w/ 30m health and critting for 50k on a boss w/ 50m health?
None, except the 50k makes your nerdgasm a little more intense.
The day Blizzard starts balancing the game around "omgz peplez expectz bigger critz nao, we must buffz dmgez to pleaz their epeenz" is the day I quit playing this game.
Finnicks Nov 16th 2010 3:14PM
Internet Explorer 9 Beta for the freaking LOSS.
wow Nov 16th 2010 3:34PM
Spam heal moar, spam FoL less. Be less bad.
I've healed all the trash up to the first boss in grim batol without a single mana break~ Its not *that* hard.
MrJackSauce Nov 16th 2010 3:38PM
What's the difference between hitting for a smaller amount on PvE than a bigger?
One number is higher than the other.
Lloren Nov 16th 2010 6:09PM
I realize that negative opinions are not tolerated here, but there's no reason to call me "bad" because I think this article was crap. I was being sarcastic at the fact that they are cheering for everyone being nerfed, especially healing.
blueindy322 Nov 16th 2010 2:18PM
I cannot tell if there was sarcasm in your comment "I've listed warlock changes below for reference, although all classes experienced a hefty nerf on their damage sticks. Hooray!"
If there isn't any I take it as an insult to all Warlock players.
From the past posts made, I believe you play the Pally. Much could be said about that. But, you made alot of the issues to all classes including that one an example.
Hope to see you on the battlefield.
A warlock.
C.Christian.Moore Nov 16th 2010 2:39PM
Blueindy322,
I made the warlock reference to show how developers have taken a look at damage and determined it needs to be toned down. Warlocks were the easiest ones to cherry pick because they have no other changes other than damage (and they have a lot of abilities that got a 12% nerf at that).
I play many classes, and even one that (apparently) might surprise you:
http://wow.joystiq.com/2010/08/31/reader-ui-of-the-week-c-christian-moores-pvp-ui/
Pazazu Nov 16th 2010 2:38PM
To me it sounds like he's un-sarcastically celebrating the nerfing of ALL classes' damage, because such a nerf would lead to a pvp environment that is less bursty than that of WotLK.
Also, I'm pretty sure he's mentioned that he plays many characters, and that one of them, specifically, is a warlock.
blueindy322 Nov 16th 2010 3:27PM
@ Moore
I'm sorry I posted earlier but it didn't take.
I'm just simply still angry about the reign of Pallies and DK's during most of WotLK. And, welcome changes in these new patches.
As I played Beta, the Vanilla feel is kinda back. But I still miss the SS vs. TM glory days.
@ Cutaia
If that's true then it's a rebalancing not nerfs. IMO.
Mr. Tastix Nov 16th 2010 3:58PM
If you, as a warlock, cannot be a paladin, then you need to learn to play (unless it's Holy, but in this example we were talking about -damage-, that's not a healers priority so nerfing that means little to most healers).
For the entirety of Wrath, any decent caster would -obliterate- Paladins.
(cutaia) Nov 16th 2010 3:59PM
"@ Cutaia
If that's true then it's a rebalancing not nerfs. IMO."
The difference between those words is a matter of semantics when context tells you that either one refers to a damage reduction.
(cutaia) Nov 16th 2010 4:02PM
"@ Cutaia
If that's true then it's a rebalancing not nerfs. IMO."
The difference between those words is a matter of semantics when context tells you that either one refers to a damage reduction.
(cutaia) Nov 16th 2010 2:22PM
I thought MMO-Champion had determined that all those 12% nerfs on all the classes referred to the 1-79 game? Or am I mistaken here?
wutsconflag Nov 16th 2010 2:32PM
I'm pretty sure Cutaia is right. These "nerfs" were applied by Blizzard to levels 1-79 to handle some of the ridiculous damage some classes were doing (hello all-rogue battlegrounds, we're looking at you).
C.Christian.Moore Nov 16th 2010 2:42PM
Cutaia,
If that's the case, my bad. I hadn't read that anywhere.
I guess I can still make an argument for developers looking out for burst being over the top in PvP, but they might want to see how it pans out at 85 first.
Thanks so much for the insightful comments and the constructive correction, you're a gem.
C. Christian Moore
Contributing Editor
WoW.joystiq.com
(cutaia) Nov 16th 2010 2:54PM
Well, the original post really freaked people out:
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/785082-Cataclysm-Beta-Build-13241-%28Updated%29
Then there were some responses from blues and clarifications...here's the only one I could find right now:
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/123500/new-spell-changes
Then the MMO-Champion post was updated and whittled down quite a bit to the one you linked. All the 12% nerfs to warlocks appear to be intact on the final MMO-C post, so maybe that's one of the few that did end up being post 80 changes. It's tough to tell with datamining sometimes.