Know Your Lore: Go'el, son of Durotan, page 2

Doomhammer's time was short-lived. Thrall and the united clans of the Horde began breaking the orcs out of the camps, one by one -- and as they did, Blackmoore grew more and more furious as reports of his once-slave leading the army reached him. He ordered his men to the remaining interment camps, and in the ensuing battle, Doomhammer was struck from behind. As he gasped his last breaths, he told Thrall to take the title of Warchief and lead the orcish people to peace.
And lead them he did. Thrall's people followed him eagerly from the remaining camps; they followed him as he led the assault against Durnholde Keep, where he had lived among the humans as their slave. They watched as he leveled the keep to the ground after discovering that Blackmoore had murdered Taretha for her betrayal. They left and settled in the Eastern Kingdoms and remained out of human sight. And when Thrall was visited by a strange prophet and told to evacuate to Kalimdor, they followed him there, too."Orgrim Doomhammer has named me Warchief," he cried. "It is a title I would not have sought, but I have no choice. I have been named, and so I will obey. Who will follow me to lead our people to freedom?"
They followed him to Kalimdor, they followed him to Durotar, and they helped him found the new capital city, which he named after their fallen leader. They followed him into the Third War, and they watched as the Horde turned from just orcs to including trolls and tauren as allies. They watched as Thrall and Grom left to confront Mannoroth; they were freed from the blood pact that had haunted them for decades, even as Grom's life slipped away.
Now they were free, well and truly free. Thrall led them to fight alongside the humans that had once imprisoned them and the strange night elves of the forests from which the orcs wanted to harvest lumber. They fought against the Burning Legion and won -- and after the war was over, they watched their leader, the hero who had freed them from imprisonment at human hands, try to ally with the human race.

And some began to question the Warchief's intentions. Some began to wonder if he was truly fit to lead. Some pondered, now and again, whether or not a Warchief who had been raised by humans -- an orc who knew nothing of his people or their history, their customs, until he was 18 years of age -- actually knew enough of the old ways to lead them down that path. Because his path was a very, very strange one; these talks of diplomacy and desperate efforts to unite the orcs and humans together made no sense.
He was a leader, but it was not a title or position he sought. He tried to usher his people down the path of peace -- but was his definition of peace really what the orcs wanted, what they needed? Those that had trusted him, Grom, Orgrim -- did they simply hear his words and agree with their intent? Did they really know who he was, what he wanted to achieve for the orcish race?
Did he?

Thrall was Warchief of the Horde, but he never intended to pursue that title. He led his people because he had to -- because someone had to lead the orcs back to the old ways, and everyone agreed he was the orc who could best accomplish this. He went through Drek'Thar's initiation to become a shaman but was almost immediately swept up with prophets, wars, diplomacy, and the day-to-day dealings of being a leader. And that's what he did -- lead. But did he really know how to lead? He had spent over half of his life with humans, and a bare scant number of years among his own people."The whole idea with Thrall is that...can you argue that this guy, who's so -- he's so Clark Kent, right? So straight up, he does a good job, all the time. He doesn't swear, he doesn't beat anybody down. He's a good leader; he's a noble soul. And he's spent all of these years, building and running the Horde, selflessly. And the idea is, does he really -- I'm just saying -- does he really know who he is? Or after all these years, is it just more of a Bruce Wayne thing, where he's a little baby when his parents are murdered, he never really grew up with a whole lot of nurturing. And at this phase of his life, after all the things he's accomplished, it's possible that he's actually a little hollow inside. He's never taken time to just grow."
-- Chris Metzen, BlizzCon 2010 Quests and Lore Q&A
In World of Warcraft, we are presented with a Warchief who seems to be confident and secure in his own abilities -- but the truth is, Thrall didn't do much at all over the course of vanilla WoW. He asked people to take down Rend Blackhand, which was understandable (after all, Blackhand was calling himself the true Warchief of the Horde). But Thrall continued to try and do the impossible; he still sought to ally the Horde with the Alliance.
Future dealings with the Warchief would only reinforce that fact. He was known for speaking with Jaina Proudmoore on a regular basis, for trying to ally with the human forces of Theramore -- even if most humans in Theramore didn't wish an alliance with the orcs any more than the orcs wanted to ally with the humans. It was inexplicable to the orcish race. Why would the Warchief try to do these things?

Greatmother Geyah was correct, to a degree. Thrall was a slave to his past -- he continued to carry the name Blackmoore gave him, despite the unfavorable way the orcs seemed to look upon it. Even after Blackmoore's death, he clung to the name and sought no other for himself. He would always be Thrall -- slave no longer. Or was he? Did he keep the name as a reminder of his past, or did he keep the name as a reminder of what he really was?Greatmother Geyah says: There is no doubt - you are the heir of Durotan... my grandson. Draka told me she was with child before she and your father left our world, but I never dared dream that they would survive...
Thrall says: They... did not, Greatmother. They were killed shortly after I was born. I never knew them. I was raised as a slave. To this day, I carry the name of Thrall.
Greatmother Geyah says: Thrall? You've been a slave only to the past, grandson! But no more! When last I saw him, Durotan told me the name he would give his unborn son... He was... so proud...
Greatmother Geyah wipes a tear away.
Greatmother Geyah says: Go'el. You are Go'el, son of Durotan - rightful chieftain of the Frostwolves. This day, grandson - you are the great joy of my heart.
Was there some small subconscious part of Thrall that thought of himself as slave still -- not to Blackmoore, but to his fate? His destiny? Perhaps to serving the Horde itself? Thrall returned to Azeroth with Hellscream's son in tow and began to try and teach Garrosh the ways of the Horde. Garrosh rankled under Thrall's odd ideas of peace and understanding, of his unusual concepts of diplomacy and reasoning. Because to Garrosh, the old ways were clear -- the strong lead, the weak follow. A true Warchief would never ally with those deemed as weak, with cowards. Yet Thrall seemed determined to do so.
Over the course of events presented in the Warcraft comics, the Wrath of the Lich King expansion, and the novel The Shattering, we've seen Thrall and Garrosh continually butt heads. Yet Thrall doesn't quite put Garrosh in his place. Garrosh challenged Thrall to a duel for Warchief, and Garrosh won -- or rather, Garrosh was in the process of winning when the two were interrupted by the Lich King's attacks on Orgrimmar.
Thrall said that they would discuss the duel later and promptly sent the young Hellscream to lead the forces in Northrend, along with Varok Saurfang. Supposedly, this would keep Garrosh occupied while Thrall could continue his diplomatic missions. But maybe there was a part of Thrall that already recognized Garrosh as being the sort of orc that was really meant to lead. Maybe he sent Garrosh to lead the orc forces because he realized, somewhere inside of himself, that he wasn't truly capable of doing so.
Think about it -- if Thrall led his people into war and the Alliance got in the way, what would Thrall do? Try to negotiate for a peaceful resolution. And while he was doing that, his people could potentially be slaughtered. Were these really the sort of actions a Warchief should take? Garrosh was in the process of actually besting Thrall in honorable combat when they were interrupted. Had the battle continued, would Garrosh have won?

And then, after the war was over, Thrall discovered that the elemental spirits no longer responded to his call. The mighty shaman was reduced to ... what, exactly? As Metzen said at the Quests and Lore panel this year: Who was Thrall? His life was spent in servitude, first to Blackmoore and then to his people. When exactly did Thrall get a chance to discover what kind of being he really was? An orc raised by humans, the only one of his kind to experience such a thing -- most humans were completely unwilling to accept him, most of his people were beginning to wonder if they should accept him, either.
Thrall made a very deliberate choice, and it was the only choice he could make in his situation -- to step down as Warchief, let Garrosh take over (albeit supposedly as a temporary thing), and travel to Nagrand. He chose this partially to try and figure out what exactly was going on with the elements in Azeroth, but mostly to try and figure out who he, Thrall, really was -- and how exactly he fit in a world with two races that shaped him. He is the progeny of two societies, and neither really, wholly accepts him as an individual. Perhaps Thrall's attempts to unite Alliance and Horde were really a subconscious attempt to recreate himself -- a strange mesh of human ideals and orcish traditions. Maybe by trying to prove that the two could work together, he could prove that he was as worthy a being as anyone, human, orc, or otherwise.

In Cataclysm, Thrall is no longer Warchief. Instead, he's joined The Earthen Ring in an attempt to understand the deeper part of himself and try to determine who he is and how he can help shape the world around him. From a baby who barely understood orcish, to the leader of a people he never quite seemed to understand, Thrall has lived a long time and learned a lot about the world around him. The one lesson he never learned was where he fit in that world, and in Cataclysm, it looks like he may finally gain that understanding."You are Thrall, son of Durotan," she said without preamble.
"I am," he replied.
"A filthy name. Here you will be called Go'el."
"Go'el might be the name my parents intended for me, but fate chose otherwise. I prefer Thrall."
She turned her head and spat. "A human word that means 'slave.' It is not fit for any orc to bear, least of all one who claims to lead us -- even the ones who don't live in this world."
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 4 of 4)
anthonycwoods Nov 28th 2010 8:26PM
Anne Stickney: the best writer on Wow Insider staff, bar none.
Thanks for another awesome article.
Henri Poincaré Nov 28th 2010 10:22PM
Go'el? \shrug This is a Hebrew word which simply means 'redeemer' or 'saviour', which makes it a rather cheesy choice. But then, why am I surprised. I guess - \shrug, again.
Kar Nov 29th 2010 1:48AM
Cheesier than Thrall, which means slave in English? A bit archaic of course, which is why it even worked as name, most people aren't familiar with the word but might recognize "enthralled" for example.
Killik Nov 29th 2010 5:44AM
It's also reminiscent of "Kal-el".
skreeran Nov 28th 2010 10:14PM
Thrall just needs to give the beatdown onto everyone that speaks out against him. In modern human society, we would see that as fascist, but for orcs, that's the mark of a leader. Lots of orcs are questioning whether Thrall is strong enough to lead them, and they think Garrosh is stronger, so a lot of problems would be solved if he just beat the tar out of Hellscream, Korm, Agmar, Krenna, and so on.
chaosdimalupig Nov 28th 2010 11:03PM
But they would nerf shamans somehow...
Ilmyrn Nov 29th 2010 12:47AM
And you just KNOW Garrosh is the kind of guy that goes on the forums to complain and demand nerfs every time he loses a duel.
Dreyja Nov 29th 2010 12:42AM
I love Thrall and Anne's writing. That is all. :D
henevsarhoe Nov 29th 2010 3:48AM
Does it occur to anyone that this stinks of a retcon? The feeling from Outland quests and from Warcraft III was that orcs were peaceful before being incited by the legion and the demonic blood; they are a shaman based culture reverential of life. The violence of Orgrim and such were blamed on victims of circumstance not their natural state. I mean, the frostwolves led a solitary existence in hiding because they didn't care for warmongering, even if it freed their brothers.
And now that war is needed, orcs are naturally homicidical, blood of mannaroth or not. I also don't get where this "Thrall was stupidly seeking peace" thing came from, since Vanilla to Wrath there was basically peace and all the top Horde characters spoke about it being a new age of the New Horde. Saurfang and Thrall were models for the New Horde, in contrast to the Blackhands Old Horde. I mean, Garrosh is making a horde very much in line with Blackhand's Dark Horde, when through vanilla all of us New Hordies united in our hate of their ways. Are we to believe all those people where just following Thrall's (apparently terrible?) leadership in fighting against their own philosophy?
Sorcha Nov 29th 2010 5:34AM
http://www.wowpedia.org/Om%27riggor
Orcs were not homicidal maniacs before demonbloodgate, but they weren't green humans either. Their culture was that of the noble savage and 'savage' is a very key part of that. Honour, yes, but slaughter too, where honourable. They had arenas, they fought for fun. Their natural response to danger was to crush it (see: ogres, gronn and draenei: part of the reason they attacked the draenei was because they felt they were a threat and couldn't be trusted. Durotan speaks of feeling like he was being patronised and mocked by Velen which no doubt led to part of the resentment. Although Ner'zhul was the one who influenced them into the slaughter and he in turn was controlled by Kil'jaeden, he only capitalised on the mistrust and (misplaced) anger the orcs already felt. Rise of the Horde is is a really good one to read to explain the brutal but noble nature of orcish society pre-Ner'zhul.)
And this was before they felt they had really been mistreated. The average member of the orcish Horde today probably spent some time locked up in an internment camp. Remember, their battle-cry is 'Victory or death!' Either is honourable, anything else (including imprisonment) is not. This is interesting because it shows how the humans trying to do what they perceive as the 'right thing' by the orcs was actually probably the worst thing they could have done.
So yeah, right now orcs look at humans and say 'We attacked them and when they caught us they deprived us of honour and now we're supposed to ally with them?' They don't perceive humans as honourable and therefore neither as worthy allies (in contrast to trolls and tauren. I can't really explain Forsaken or blood elves with this theory, though; the latter I guess come because of their relationship to the former, the alliance with the former is, if you ask me, the biggest inconsistency in lore and really only there because of game mechanics.)
For your second point, it is true that the top Horde characters talked about a New Horde and peace. But Thrall surrounds himself by people who agree with his views, like many leaders. Your average orc respects Saurfang and Thrall but doesn't necessarily think they're right, just as many people respected Churchill as a strong war leader but disagreed with his peacetime politics. (Sorry, can't think of an American example.) And the average orc doesn't see the bigger picture, either, because they're not privy to the info the top orcs have. So it's easier for them to be warmongers because they don't foresee bad consequences.
I am completely dosed up on cough syrup so I apologise if this makes no sense.
Also, Anne, I just wanted to say I really love your writing.
Hëx Nov 29th 2010 9:05AM
When and why does Thrall allow warlocks to join the "modern" horde? I've read all the books except The Shattering and the manga/comics; and I can't recall it. As someone who plays a lock as one of my two mains I have always wondered this.
Boobah Nov 29th 2010 11:52AM
When? Sometime between the founding of Durotar and the beginning of WoW.
Why? Because some orcs managed to convince him that, rather than being pawns of demons, they were able to turn demons to the service of the horde. Because many orc warlocks were just as misled about what was really going on as the rest of the Horde. And, perhaps most importantly, its far easier to keep track of 'em if they don't think they're going to be executed the first time anyone finds out about their dabbling in fel magics. (see Neeru Fireblade.)
Irontoof Nov 29th 2010 10:26AM
Even if his in-game name changes, he'll still be Thrall to me. And I'm always going to commit one mistake:
"Everyone, help! There's an Alliance raid coming for Thra- I mean, Garrosh. Pffff... go Alliance!"
i.read.your Nov 29th 2010 11:30AM
I see Thrall-Go'el's journey to Outland to become a true shaman more as a growing-up than anything. I also see his treatment of Garrosh as this. Garrosh is given to us as an immature 'war-is-everything' orc. Something I see alot of new Horde players running with. Then as you do the quests and read into the lore of the Horde, I begin to understand Thrall. He was abused and mistreated by Blackmoore and his ilk yet he knows humans are capable of compassion and honor. However, the same idea is not expressed by the Alliance, for good reason. The Alliance only know of the slaughtering blood crazed orcs of yore and that's all they know. Until Wrathgate, Warcraft was "Orcs and Humans". The night elves only knew of the invading green skins destroying their land, which is sacred to them. Until Archimonde, the idea of a treaty was just ridiculous -- and its proven in The Shattering. Just go to Maestra's Point now or Silverwing Manor. The Horde have invaded and the elves are doing anything possible - including summoning the very powers of the Earth and Elune to destroy the orcs. You learn that the Royal Apothecary Society is even helping demonic entities (Satyrs) to corrupt Darkshore.
Vanilla - Horde vs. Alliance (Its war. Deal with it)
BC - (Horde vs Alliance) vs. Burning Legion (Ok, so Orc weren't always bad. Here, here's some space goats and btw, here's some pointy eared bastards no one likes.)
Wrath - Horde & Alliance vs. Scourge (Whoa, so yeah. Arthas hates you all cause you breath. The Horde are cool because of Saurfang. And sorry Alliance, Bolvar is dead. We loved him too. Here's Varian back. He has a pony tail)
The Shattering - Damn pacifist night elves. Here's some pure tragedy to get you into a warlike mood. Btw, your leader Malfurion is wearing a chicken-shaman suit and looks like he should be working for Chickfilla. Oh, horde.. I took your Cairne and Thrall and Garrosh is going to become awesome -- eventually. Varian is... cooler, but his son is AWESOME... for a youngin')
Cataclysm - To Be Determined.
Dennis Nov 29th 2010 11:56AM
If Durotan never drank the demons blood, why is Go'el's skin green instead of red?
Dennis Nov 29th 2010 11:56AM
If Durotan never drank the demons blood, why is Go'el's skin green instead of red?
Kagato Nov 29th 2010 1:31PM
What was the sense in allying with those that sought to imprison the orcs? What was the sense in allying with the human race, when the human race seemed to want nothing more than bloodshed?
Riiiight because the Orcs themselves dont want bloodshed at all, it's all those evil nasty humans.