Skip to Content
12-26-2010 @ 4:36AM
I just had the 'pleasure' of visiting Fail Barad for the first time. The criticisms in this article are dead on. (I've been talking to most of the Horde WG veterans and majority hate the white 'failephant' that is TB).This is coming from someone that has read and understood Sun Tzu's Art of War and Machiavelli's Prince.I've played easily 300+ WinterGrasps on various toons and given that Ghostlands US owns it 71.0% that makes 213+ wins.Lol Barad in comparison is a crock of horseshit.Heck simplest modification that Blizzard could make is 2 buildings need to be controlled. Requiring the capture of all 3 with the defender's GY in the middle is utterly ridiculous.In the mean time, servers will need to have teams ready to win just after server reset so that their side can keep the zone owned for a week, even tenacity + the balancing mechanics of WinterGrasp meant that Alliance on Ghostlands managed to capture WG about 1 out of 8.5 battles (or just under once a day). Here all the defending side has to do is zerg between 2 nodes - it is mathematically unlikely that attackers have a chance to win, and if you figure in afker-honor leeches, and the confusion caused by noobs who haven't read up on the battle... yeah whomever thought this 'balancing' act up is an idiot.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.