Know Your Lore: Sylvanas Windrunner, part 1

It can be reasonably argued that of all the faction leaders currently featured in Cataclysm, none are quite as questionable in both motive and actions as Sylvanas Windrunner. The history of Sylvanas and her role in Wrath of the Lich King has already been discussed in the Forsaken politics article from earlier this year; at the point it was written, we had no real idea what exactly she was going to be doing in Cataclysm. Now we have answers, and those answers do nothing but raise even more incredibly disturbing questions.
Where do the Banshee Queen's loyalties lie? To the Horde, to her people, or to some other power entirely? Sylvanas' past was fraught with grief and horror; her future seems to be teetering on the brink of something even worse. With the introduction of the worgen, Sylvanas has something to focus on -- but what exactly are her motives, and who is it that she's ultimately fighting for?
Please note: The following post contains spoilers for the Forsaken storylines featured in Cataclysm content. If you have not played through Silverpine, Hillsbrad Foothills or the Western Plaguelands, turn away! And go play through those zones, because they are amazing.

Much to ponder? Definitely. Sylvanas had spent her unlife so focused on destroying the Lich King that the thought of what happened after he was destroyed never crossed her mind. She was so single-minded in her pursuit that the death of the Lich King left her with nothing, really. Yet she had a population of intelligent undead looking to her for guidance. Their queen had led them to victory, at last, and the being responsible for their suffering was finally destroyed.So, it is done. I had not dared to trust my senses. Too many times has the Lich King made me to be a fool. Finally, he has been made to pay for the atrocities he imposed upon my people. May Azeroth never fail to remember the horrible price we paid for our weakness, for our pride. But what now, Hero? What of those freed from his grasp but still shackled to their mortal coils? Leave me. I have much to ponder.
But Sylvanas and the Forsaken had a lot going against them; the coup of the Royal Apothecary Society was unsuccessful, and the disastrous results of the Wrathgate left the rest of the Horde incredibly wary of their supposed allies. Kor'kron guards had replaced Sylvanas' abominations, and her people were under close watch. On the one hand, they were free from the Lich King; on the other, they were now caged by the eyes of the Horde.

These two are definitely out. Sylvanas is just as ruthless as before, if not more so; she isn't looking for acceptance for her people, and the help from the Horde didn't accomplish anything in terms of warming up the cold-hearted banshee queen. There was no trust involved after the Wrathgate -- the Horde had made up its mind that the Forsaken needed to be under constant supervision. While the replacement guards may have been put into play to "help" prevent any future coups, what they essentially did was show the Forsaken that despite whatever claims of alliance the Horde may have had, the Forsaken people were not to be trusted under any circumstances.Sylvanas' redemption Sylvanas, over time, has begun to grow a little more heart. The addition and acceptance of the Forsaken to the Horde has softened her perspective on the living. The help from the Horde during the Undercity's capture and more notably in achieving the vengeance against Arthas that drove her all these years may have also had a hand in convincing her that an alliance with the living is not only possible but preferable to simply killing them all. The death of Arthas quieted the vengeance that burned in her heart, and now it is possible for her to approach the days ahead with hope for her people's ultimate acceptance by society.
Sylvanas' grief Sylvanas traveled to Quel'Thalas for no particular reason and stumbled upon not only the traitor responsible for Arthas' advance into Silvermoon, but the person responsible for her inevitable death at Arthas' hands. If Dar'Khan had not interfered, perhaps she could have stayed the assault on Quel'Thalas and saved her people from their abandonment. With the revelation that the Sunwell was not lost entirely, Sylvanas found herself strangely energized and overcome with the urge to reconnect with her living roots. After Anveena had safely been hidden away again, Sylvanas approached her former people to try and atone for her failure as a ranger-general and as a guardian of Silvermoon. The tentative alliance has convinced her that perhaps while it isn't possible to go back to her living life entirely, it is still possible for her to be accepted -- and in turn, perhaps it is possible for the Forsaken themselves to be accepted by the living. The death of Arthas was not only a gift to the Forsaken but to her former people, and now she can concentrate on leading her people to acceptance and ultimately, forgiveness.

During the Alliance half of the Battle for the Undercity sequence, Varian Wrynn refers to the Undercity as "our kingdom." This isn't exactly an untrue statement -- Lordaeron was an Alliance kingdom before the rise of the Lich King. But this is where Sylvanas' main problem rests -- to the Alliance, Lordaeron is theirs and should remain theirs. To the Forsaken, Lordaeron is their home -- and it's absolutely true. The Forsaken are the remnants of the people of Lordaeron, raised from death into undead. It is their home and always has been.
Sylvanas isn't looking for acceptance or forgiveness; she's trying to establish what is only right. Lordaeron belongs to the Forsaken in death, because Lordaeron belonged to those very same people in life. While her methods border on madness to those viewing the situation from the stance of the living, the end result makes sense; Lordaeron should rightfully stay with those that owned it to begin with, even if those people are now dead.

This was perhaps applicable for a short time after the Lich King's death -- the dialogue with players turning in the Shadowmourne quest item leaves her asking "What now?" in such a way that it suggests, again, that she'd given little thought to the possibility of actions after the Lich King's defeat. However, while the Battle for the Undercity was presented as a coup, and while Sylvanas denied all association with Putress and Varimathras, in Cataclysm, the Forsaken are still using the forsaken blight -- the plague that killed Bolvar and Saurfang, the plague that they'd sworn never to use again. Which leads us to the last theory presented in the article regarding Forsaken politics.Sylvanas' plight Sylvanas has no idea what's going on. She had a very solid reason for leading the Forsaken -- revenge against the man that tortured both her and the others she leads, the creature that cursed them to an un-life of grief and regret. But her people, who were at first so loyal to her cause, have turned against her, and with the one reason for her people's survival now taken care of, Sylvanas is left to deal with the aftermath of that betrayal. Without vengeance, what does Sylvanas have to drive her? Without the support of her people, how will she lead them to anything greater? And were the Forsaken working against her completely destroyed, or are there others that seek to undermine her rule? What are Sylvanas and the Forsaken as a whole supposed to do now?

This theory, oddly enough, appears to be closer to the truth than originally expected. While the amount of Sylvanas' involvement with Putress, Varimathras and the Forsaken Blight hasn't really been defined, her continued use of the Forsaken blight is almost a silent admission that she had some sort of involvement in its production. Either that, or the end result of the product's use didn't really matter to her one way or another. What we can gather from this is that Sylvanas' issue wasn't with the blight or its affects at the Wrathgate -- the only thing that irritated her was the attempted coup.Sylvanas' vengeance Sylvanas, possessing an incredibly shrewd and tactical mind, allied with the blood elves in the hopes of increasing the Forsaken's numbers as the blood elves slowly died out from magic withdrawal. However, the Horde was still breathing down her neck, and in addition, Varimathras was proving a more irritating presence by the day. To this end, she turned a blind eye to his machinations, fully aware that he was staging a coup -- and when he "took over" the Undercity, she quietly allowed it to happen. After all, not only would she be getting rid of a thorn in her side, but also she'd look very much the helpless victim to her Horde "allies," and the "betrayal" would absolve her of any involvement with the Forsaken Blight at the same time. With the death of Arthas, she and her people can now turn their attentions on bolstering their numbers, one corpse at a time -- as soon as they get rid of the pesky Kor'kron littering their halls.
The banshee queen now possesses an almost single-minded obsession with expanding Forsaken territory. Lordaeron is in the process of being turned; even the Scarlet Crusade is now undead. In addition, Sylvanas and her people have completely wiped out the town of Southshore with the Forsaken blight and continue to push westward into the Plaguelands, seeking to take over Andorhal in the name of the Forsaken. While the Horde seeks control of Gilneas as a major Horde base in the Eastern Kingdoms, Sylvanas seems more intent on grabbing the land specifically for the Forsaken.
The other point to the original theory is that Sylvanas knew about the coup ahead of time and actually fostered it in an attempt to get rid of Varimathras and Putress while keeping her hands clean of any involvement. At first, this seemed so far-fetched -- even for Sylvanas -- as to be absurd, but the events that play out in Silverpine tell a story that seems to lend itself to that theory. Not only because of her actions, but because of her odd new allies -- allies that Varimathras would have strongly objected to ...

Come back tomorrow for more on the banshee queen and the new objects of her affection, the Val'kyr.
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.Filed under: Lore, Know your Lore
Patch 5.2 interview with Dave Kosak
Inside an old alt's vault
The latest patch 5.2 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 5)
Noah Dec 18th 2010 8:24PM
Are you kidding? Sylvanas is so f*cked up that even Al Sharpton is going "I'm outta here man".
Props to anyone who knows where the reference comes from.
skatersrule99 Dec 19th 2010 12:40AM
@noah
I love robin williams live on broadway XD
Cure4Living Dec 19th 2010 2:56AM
I agree although I personally can't get over the whole rotting corpse thing myself...
Undra Dec 19th 2010 4:51AM
Pretty, Smart, Sane
Bliz picked their two.
themann1086 Dec 19th 2010 2:25PM
@Rubitard: Smart, Sexy and Sane: Pick Two
Tolkfan Dec 18th 2010 6:43PM
Just let us kill the bitch already...
Angus Dec 18th 2010 6:58PM
You guys have never gotten "For the Alliance" over there?
She's kinda required for that.
Jack Miles Dec 18th 2010 7:00PM
We have. Twice. It didn't stick.
trefpoid Dec 18th 2010 6:47PM
I love Sylvanas :D I love how she reacts to Garrosh calling her a bitch and all, she can't care less about the new Warchief. I must say I had the greatest time questing in Silverpine and she seemed really honest when she told me her story and that she wanted to defend Lordaeron and keep it for her people. All the Gilnean casualties are just part of it. Her madness and total lack of care for the living is something I really enjoy, it feels so good to have such a leader when you are playing a forsaken. Of course, to all the rest of the world, she must seem really bad, but for her people, she is a goddess and she does her best to keep them safe and increase their numbers. We all know the Forsaken would cease to exist if Sylvanas didn't start raising new people into undeath, So yeah, I don't mind her crazy stuff. Also, I LOVED how they wiped out Southshore and basically took Hillsbrad Foothills as a whole for the horde. It shouldn't even be contested territory anymore. That whole patch of land is Forsaken now and I feel really good having that much territory for the Horde over there. I hope she keeps devoloping and finding a new goal in life. She is so damn badass
jordan Dec 18th 2010 8:49PM
Yes, it belongs to the forsaken... I mean the horde. The first thing they did was burn up all the crops. For all they care the starving orcs could die in a ditch.
Eternauta Dec 18th 2010 9:10PM
I'd love to share your optimism, but I can't.
How do we know Sylvannas has the best interest for her people in mind? For now, the Forsaken's goals and Sylvannas' own personal goals were the same: To kill the Lich King in vengeance for what he'd done to them, and to defend their homeland from the Alliance and the Scarlet Crusade.
What if Sylvannas suddenly found herself in a situation that forced her to make a hard choice: The best for her people, or the best for herself? Would she sacrifice herself for the Forsaken?
Every good ruler puts the needs of their people before their own.
I don't know you guys, but Sylvannas doesn't look like the "selfless" kind of person to me.
Artificial Dec 18th 2010 11:49PM
@Eternauta: Hmm. I just don't see it. Sylvanas really doesn't have anything else to "live" for but her people. So, yeah, what you seem to find hard to accept is what to me seems the only plausible attitude for her to have. She does strike me as precisely the kind of person you think she isn't.
Ata Dec 19th 2010 2:49AM
@Eternauta
But what do the Forsaken as a whole have to live for? They can't go back to their living family, ever. They can't just go live out the rest of their undead lives somewhere, first time they run into someone Alliance side, they'll be destroyed, and the Scarlet Crusade still kicks around in a few places. All they have now is their unlife, and if they don't fight for it and their territory, they'll be overrun and destroyed, by the very people they used to know. Any Forsaken who don't share this view, well they end up with the Argent Crusade, mostly, as thats the only accepting place anywhere else in the world that'll take em. You don't see them as pirates, you don't see them as Syndicate, you don't see them in neutral towns, anywhere. The only neutral faction that accepts them is the Argent Crusade...so you have that, which is basically just a continuation of earlier fight, only against the remanints of the Scourge instead of the LK, which means they'll eventually run into the same 'what now?' someday....or you stick with the only group out there you can really call 'your people', safety in numbers, keep hold of what land you can stay in that at least was home once and still can be, or you go die in a sad, lonely corner of the world.
I don't think the Forsaken as a whole are really thinking things all that differently from Sylvanas. They've all got the -exact same- quandary as she does....'Arthas is dead...what now?'
SaintStryfe Dec 19th 2010 3:38AM
If you'll recall, before WoW in the RPG books, the Forsaken were an independant group before joining the Horde. They took represenatives from both factions. There was a time for peace. That ended when they joined the Horde. It was shattered when the King of Stormwind saw what they were doing to humans developing the Blight.
Irin Dec 18th 2010 6:59PM
The forsaken are also trying to gain a foothold in Arathi. After handing in trollbane players are told there is "more to come" by the Forsaken Ranger questgiver. But "these next steps will take weeks to complete rather than minutes." And then something about fortifications....
And people have complained that Blizz did nothing with the Arathi Highlands zone...
I'm expecting Arathi to be a future patch update as the Forsaken get closer to dwarven territory.
ldene Dec 18th 2010 7:20PM
further expansion would be nice, we should own entire nothern part tbh :D
Wouldnt mind an upgade to the surface part of Undercity/Lordaeron while their at it
ldene Dec 18th 2010 7:17PM
wheres that picture from? tis quite nice. and who's the guy to the left of her?
Nipah Dec 18th 2010 8:41PM
I believe its from one of the cards for the trading card game.
I say this because when the new look for the site was revealed, http://www.wowtcg.com/, I noticed that Sylvanas has a bit broader chin than I remember her having, and the image stuck (though its much less noticeable in color for some reason...).
edit while still typing:
in fact, it seems to be the art for the card title: Sylvanas, Lady of Undercity.
http://www.wowtcg.com/products/class-starter-deck (down the left side, in the card browser)
Nipah Dec 18th 2010 8:46PM
wtb edit tool:
http://www.sonsofthestorm.com/viewer.php?artist=raneman&cat=warcraft&art=85#_self
Wowcheatshome Dec 18th 2010 7:26PM
Well I certainly believe she's up to summin'
I also think that perhaps the Forsaken Take Gilneas, but, the Alliance take back Lordaeon I believe that that makes perfect sense!