Know Your Lore: Sylvanas Windrunner, part 2, page 2

King Genn Greymane tried to pull together his kingdom, but the place was in tatters. Not only were there reports of Forsaken activity, but the worgen curse was ripping through his people and nobody, not even himself, was safe from its effects. In addition, Gilnean nobility chafed under his rule, most notably Lord Vincent Godfrey. After Godfrey discovered that Greymane had succumbed to the worgen curse, he turned on his king, kidnapping him and holding him for ransom. Once Greymane was rescued, Godfrey leapt from the cliffs to his death, because he preferred death to having a worgen as his king.
This played into Sylvanas' hands quite nicely. Intelligence reports brought word of Godfrey to her, and she ordered his body found, to be raised by val'kyr as one of the Forsaken. Lord Godfrey was intended to be an ally that would provide useful intelligence in regards to Gilneas and those still in power -- including Lord Darius Crowley, who was the largest obstacle standing in Sylvanas' way.
For the Horde, of course. Though Sylvanas is quick to state that all of her actions are in the name of the Horde, her comments when not under the scrutiny of any orcs assigned to watch her tell a different story entirely. Since the Wrathgate, use of the Forsaken blight was forbidden, but Sylvanas continued to use it at every opportunity. Is the blight that useful of a tool, or are Sylvanas and the Forsaken planning another coup -- not of the Undercity, but of the Horde itself?Sylvanas Windrunner says: Rise, Lord Vincent Godfrey. Be reborn as an instrument of my vengeance!
Arthura rises in the air and proceeds to reanimate Lord Godfrey, Baron Ashbury and Lord Walden.
Lord Godfrey says: I live again...
Sylvanas Windrunner says: You live to serve me, Godfrey. Together we will crush the worgen uprising and retake Gilneas for the Forsaken.
High Warlord Cromush says: For the Horde ...
Sylvanas Windrunner says: Yes, of course ...
In Silverpine, Lord Godfrey and his men began their work for Sylvanas by wiping out Pyrewood Village and the worgen inhabitants of the area. But the worgen of Gilneas, led by Darius Crowley, weren't without their own allies. Crowley managed to forge an alliance with Ivar Bloodfang, the leader of the Bloodfang worgen. Together, the two groups continued to create havoc and destroy Sylvanas' forces. In short time, the banshee queen found herself in danger of losing not only the war in Gilneas but possibly Silverpine as well. And so she hatched a plan for victory, with Lord Godfrey's help.

The Horde had claimed Gilneas, and victory was Sylvanas' at last. The victory was to be short-lived. Suddenly, Lord Godfrey pulled out a gun, shot Sylvanas at point blank range, and the Banshee Queen of the Forsaken fell to the ground, dead. But the val'kyr weren't about to let that stand.
This is potentially the most terrifying moment of Cataclysm. Why? Because the implications of what exactly occurred haven't been defined. What we do know is this: Sylvanas made some sort of pact with the val'kyr. The details of that pact, the terms and conditions are completely unknown. But that pact contained something that was powerful enough that the val'kyr in Sylvanas' service would kill themselves in order to save her life.High Warlord Cromush says: Fix her... FIX HER!
Agatha says: We are bound to her, sisters...
Arthura says: It will destroy us, sister...
Daschla says: It is our sacred duty. The pact was sealed, the bargain made...
Arthura says: Then let it be done.
The group of val'kyr resurrects Sylvanas, sacrificing themselves in the process.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: I saw... only darkness.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: And as I drifted towards nothingness, a brilliant light appeared, then another, and another... My dear val'kyr.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: I know now - beyond a shadow of a doubt - that the val'kyr are our future.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: We will never stop fighting for Lordaeron. Never...

Alternatively, is the woman who stood up, looked around, and proudly proclaimed that the val'kyr are the future -- is that Sylvanas Windrunner? Or are we dealing with someone, something else entirely now? The val'kyr were able to resurrect thousands of dead soldiers with no consequence to them at all -- why did they have to die to bring Sylvanas back? Is it because she's already Forsaken, or is it because they weren't dying at all -- they were simply taking over Sylvanas' corpse?
Sylvanas Windrunner has always shown herself to be a woman of single-minded determination -- once she had her eyes set on something, she would stop at nothing until she obtained whatever it was she was after. In life, it was the defense of Silvermoon and the Sunwell -- and she was close to succeeding until her death at Arthas' hands. After her death, once Arthas' hold over her began to slip, it was to kill Arthas and make him suffer for every ounce of torment he'd put her through. When Arthas escaped to Northrend, Sylvanas bided her time with her newfound people, the Forsaken, waiting for the opportunity to strike.

The Horde may have forbidden the use of the Forsaken blight, but this made little to no difference to Sylvanas, who continued to use the blight at every opportunity when it looked as though it would give her the upper hand. She claimed to work for the Horde, but casual comments dropped here and there lead to the conclusion that Sylvanas isn't really working for the Horde -- she's working for herself and her people, and woe betide anyone who happens to be standing in her way.
She succeeded in snatching Gilneas from the worgen for now, and paid her life -- or unlife, such as it is -- for it. She was brought back by the val'kyr -- but at what cost? What does the banshee queen owe the val'kyr now, and when will we see the results of the undefined pact with the former servants of the Lich King?
Speaking of the Lich King, Garrosh asked a very important question -- what is the difference between Sylvanas and the Lich King, now? When we look at Arthas, he was a young man driven by one thing -- total eradication of the Scourge. Instead, he ended up becoming a kingpin in their forces, manipulated by the Lich King into serving him eternally, entwined as one being. With Sylvanas, she spent her life devoted to the defense of her people, and in the end, died trying to eradicate the Scourge that threatened the Sunwell.
After her death, she was raised as a servant of the Lich King. She managed to break free of that grasp, becoming her own entity, but her fate was perilously close to the one that Arthas suffered. In Northrend, the Lich King raised the undead as servants to his cause -- total eradication of life on Azeroth. Now, it seems as though Sylvanas is doing exactly the same thing. Perhaps the most chilling comparison can be found in the cinematic of Arthas' death:
"I see .. only darkness before me."
Sound familiar? It's exactly what Sylvanas said after her resurrection. The parallel to Arthas is made blatantly clear -- leading us to believe that there really is very little preventing Sylvanas from stepping up as a Lich Queen of sorts. For a time -- particularly during her attempts to get the blood elves included as members of the Horde -- it seemed as though Sylvanas was perhaps reaching back to her living roots in an attempt to steady herself, but those connections have all but slipped away in Cataclysm.
As for the answer to Garrosh's question ...
From tortured leader to triumphant overlord, in Cataclysm, Sylvanas has stepped up her role as leader of the Forsaken in a major way. But her plans beyond expanding Forsaken borders and boosting the population of the formerly living residents of Lordaeron are for now unclear. Will Sylvanas ultimately bow to the might of the Horde and take her place as a valuable ally, or will her continued use of the Forsaken blight and her odd alliance with the val'kyr prove to be her downfall? Hopefully we'll see some of these questions addressed with future Cataclysm content.Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: Isn't it obvious, Warchief? I serve the Horde.
Sylvanas mockingly salutes Garrosh.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 6)
Rij Dec 20th 2010 12:48AM
We didn't get up in arms, we went down in flames.
tchristensen81 Dec 20th 2010 11:15AM
"So many people in wow are just thrown under the train, we need a redemption story... even the Ebon Blade aren't really 'redeemed' they just want to kill the Lich King. Now that its over, they needed a new purpose."
"We have a new purpose, to serve our Dark Lady." - Dabumortis, Orc Death Knight (Malfurion).
But seriously, WoW is full of redemption stories, far too many for my tastes. Hell, you have an entire race of "redeemed" Blood Elves. Myself, I prefer the darker side of the Horde.
*Evil Orc wind tunneled laugh*
Luke Dec 19th 2010 8:36PM
Sylvanas is without a doubt my favorite character in Warcraft Lore. If for some reason Blizzard decides to make the Dark Lady an enemy of the Horde or the villain of the next expansion they had better give me the option to defect with her.
Horde for life,
Undead for eternity.
Hivetyrant Dec 19th 2010 8:55PM
"Horde for life,
Undead for eternity."
Oh man, I love it
trefpoid Dec 19th 2010 11:10PM
^This. I just hope they don't pull a Kael'thas with her and make her killable. I would be really disappointed in Blizz. She can do a lot more lore-wise and she has become really really interesting lately. I really hope we get to see Alleria comeback and maybe talk some sense into her. A Windrunner reunion would be damn awesome. I know she is all badass and evil, but Sylvanas still has a heart deep down. We all know how she reacts when you bring her the necklace form Ghostlands. I bet her sisters could make her question what she is doing and maybe give her a new purpose. We shall see! I can only hope it all ends well and we Forsaken keep our beloved Banshee Queen forever.
Spider Dec 19th 2010 11:59PM
Same here. :)
Haters gonna hate. I swear fealty to my Dark Lady, to hell with the other races. ;)
Luke Dec 20th 2010 1:45AM
Indeed the haters will hate.
The most vocal detractors of Sylvanas and Garrosh, despite their faction loyalties, are the types that play Paladins or consistently route only for the "Good Guys". Most commonly these types of characters are examined only by their worst actions and decisions to the exclusion of all else.
In one of the most recent WoW Insider Podcasts one of the hosts said as much that there is no reason to play Horde or feel any sympathy for their faction leaders, in fact it was a pretty bold opinion that no one else on the podcast felt the need to address. The fact is it's fine for a person to have their own opinions, but generally the reasons given by those who do not like the Forsaken, Sylvanas, Orcs and Garrosh are all based on some moral outrage at the actions of those characters.
I'm sorry but that's just silly for a lot of reasons.
Not the least of which is the fact that we're talking about fiction.
Coming in a close second is the fact that it's illogical to judge a fallen Blood Elf or Tainted Orc by the same standards that we would humans. Any metaphor to drive this point home falls short because to our known reality humans are the only creatures who utilize written and verbal languages and the presumably the only species we're aware of that give a turd about metaphysics, especially morality.
Sqtsquish Dec 19th 2010 8:37PM
Well I know that the Lich King's consciousness was fragmented into Arthas' humanity and the Lich King and that we saw Arthas die and the Lich King still lives- now as Fordragon. Would the Valkyr know of this? Undoubtedly, and we know that despite Bolvar being a tormented being, the Valkyr may prefer a more ambitious lord then the self named "Jailer of the Damned"- in fact, who is to say that the Banshee queen herself knowing that there must be a Lich King (by Uther's own mouth) doesn't assume to ascend and usurp that for herself?
Ata Dec 19th 2010 9:37PM
You're perhaps the first person to point out that the LK still exists, -it's just not Arthas-. The world outside of the Scourge doesn't know this thanks to Bolivar's insistence he be forgotten, but wouldn't the Valkyr still have been tied to him since they were Scourge? The Vyrkul willingly go into it with Arthas, but Arthas is still the one who turns the women into the Valkyr...or is he just one method of becoming one? If the Vyrkul women could become Valkyr without the LK, that could explain why they're 'loose', but then they wouldn't be threatened with 'going extinct' either...but then, we don't know what that bargain is with Sylvanas, maybe that's not their reason why they want to join up with her.
This is a fantastic article, it's raised so many questions that I had never thought of before, I love thinking on this stuff. Great write up, Anne!
Angus Dec 20th 2010 1:12AM
Fordragon took the mantle and the control thanks to using the artifacts that created the Lich King from Arthas.
But he's not going to go around making new Valkyr and is probably exerting his control over the scourge in a subtle manner. He's quieting them down and making them mill about, and keeping them from running amok. But he's not having them do troop movements or any such thing.
It's very likely even the scourge don't realize the Lich King wasn't killed. The Valkyr probably don't either.
I'm betting Sylvanas does though. Considering her hatred, her need to know he is dead, I doubt she didn't go look up there and see a new corpse on the throne.
Heck, she probably used camo to sneak up there.
BlindWorg Dec 19th 2010 8:42PM
No Lich King means no more Val'kyr, when/if the rest of the VK are hunted down i dont see the forsaken as a major player in world politics anymore. Interested to see if how the story of Sylvanas plays out.
Aquaroko Dec 19th 2010 8:44PM
I can see it now...
Lord Godfrey says: Boom headshot!
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: Hey no fair! Haxx.
PapaPurple Dec 20th 2010 1:45PM
Nerf Huntards!
Travis Dec 19th 2010 8:46PM
If something does happen to Sylvanas in Cataclysm I think Blizz has already setup for her replacement in the Character of Lilian Voss.
If anyone has played the new beginning levels for the Forsaken (which are awesome) this NPC is a running thread through out it and by the end of it looks like she could handle just about anybody she wants. Now I don't have a character past 80 so I couldn't tell you if she plays a major character in the later Forsaken story, but she seems, at least to me, to be a person of major interest that Blizz could put the mantle of the Banshee Queen on if they wanted to or needed to.
N-train Dec 19th 2010 9:46PM
I've seen this idea pop up now and again in some articles and I don't buy it for two reasons:
A) Voss doesn't show any kind of leadership qualities, and nothing has shown me that she'd have any reason lead the Forsaken. She HATES them, despises her own reflection. She's a daughter of a high-ranking official in the Scarlet Crusade. Say what you want about Sylvannas, but she's proven that she cares for her people and has their interests at heart, I can't say Lillian Voss would do the same.
B) Voss' only reason to exist is for revenge. Sound familiar? She goes out on a vendetta to destroy her father and the Scarlet Crusade, and the whole thing parallels Sylvannas' story pretty remarkably. Nothing I've seen about Lillian Voss makes me think she's really all that different from Sylvannas at all.
Amaxe Dec 19th 2010 11:38PM
@N-Train
"Voss doesn't show any kind of leadership qualities, and nothing has shown me that she'd have any reason lead the Forsaken."
Replace "Voss" with garrosh and you have the whole problem with the Horde
Luke Dec 20th 2010 7:54AM
Replace "here go feed this tasty plague to that bunny rabbit over there" with "here, deliver this basket of hugs and kisses to those sad orphans" and you have the whole problem with the Alliance.
James Dec 20th 2010 5:29PM
The new leader should be Galen Trollbane not Lillian Voss, and he could lead the Forsaken on the slow march back to respectability along with new ally High Inquisitor Fairbanks who could be the first Forsaken to reconnect to the Light!
Sumadin Dec 19th 2010 8:46PM
What i don't get is. What is with Godfrey's timing? He could easily have headshotted Sylvanas while Crowley was watching and let Lorna loose in the confusion. That would have most like have resulted in Crowleys aid against Cromush and the valkyr, and certainly questioned if Sylvanas was going to get a third chance in life.
Oh well i guess blizzard wrote up a lousy plot for the sake of keeping sylvanas alive as she naturally couldn't be permanently killed under those cercumstances(a level 10-15 quest that only half the playerbase gets to see)
Ata Dec 19th 2010 9:41PM
Crowley wouldn't have done that because he hates worgen -so much- he killed himself rather than face life with his King being one. He wouldn't have ever done anything in a moment that would have aided the worgen, he wants them dead and out of the way as much as Sylvanas did.
It is -far-, far far from a lousy plot.