Know Your Lore: Sylvanas Windrunner, part 2, page 2

King Genn Greymane tried to pull together his kingdom, but the place was in tatters. Not only were there reports of Forsaken activity, but the worgen curse was ripping through his people and nobody, not even himself, was safe from its effects. In addition, Gilnean nobility chafed under his rule, most notably Lord Vincent Godfrey. After Godfrey discovered that Greymane had succumbed to the worgen curse, he turned on his king, kidnapping him and holding him for ransom. Once Greymane was rescued, Godfrey leapt from the cliffs to his death, because he preferred death to having a worgen as his king.
This played into Sylvanas' hands quite nicely. Intelligence reports brought word of Godfrey to her, and she ordered his body found, to be raised by val'kyr as one of the Forsaken. Lord Godfrey was intended to be an ally that would provide useful intelligence in regards to Gilneas and those still in power -- including Lord Darius Crowley, who was the largest obstacle standing in Sylvanas' way.
For the Horde, of course. Though Sylvanas is quick to state that all of her actions are in the name of the Horde, her comments when not under the scrutiny of any orcs assigned to watch her tell a different story entirely. Since the Wrathgate, use of the Forsaken blight was forbidden, but Sylvanas continued to use it at every opportunity. Is the blight that useful of a tool, or are Sylvanas and the Forsaken planning another coup -- not of the Undercity, but of the Horde itself?Sylvanas Windrunner says: Rise, Lord Vincent Godfrey. Be reborn as an instrument of my vengeance!
Arthura rises in the air and proceeds to reanimate Lord Godfrey, Baron Ashbury and Lord Walden.
Lord Godfrey says: I live again...
Sylvanas Windrunner says: You live to serve me, Godfrey. Together we will crush the worgen uprising and retake Gilneas for the Forsaken.
High Warlord Cromush says: For the Horde ...
Sylvanas Windrunner says: Yes, of course ...
In Silverpine, Lord Godfrey and his men began their work for Sylvanas by wiping out Pyrewood Village and the worgen inhabitants of the area. But the worgen of Gilneas, led by Darius Crowley, weren't without their own allies. Crowley managed to forge an alliance with Ivar Bloodfang, the leader of the Bloodfang worgen. Together, the two groups continued to create havoc and destroy Sylvanas' forces. In short time, the banshee queen found herself in danger of losing not only the war in Gilneas but possibly Silverpine as well. And so she hatched a plan for victory, with Lord Godfrey's help.

The Horde had claimed Gilneas, and victory was Sylvanas' at last. The victory was to be short-lived. Suddenly, Lord Godfrey pulled out a gun, shot Sylvanas at point blank range, and the Banshee Queen of the Forsaken fell to the ground, dead. But the val'kyr weren't about to let that stand.
This is potentially the most terrifying moment of Cataclysm. Why? Because the implications of what exactly occurred haven't been defined. What we do know is this: Sylvanas made some sort of pact with the val'kyr. The details of that pact, the terms and conditions are completely unknown. But that pact contained something that was powerful enough that the val'kyr in Sylvanas' service would kill themselves in order to save her life.High Warlord Cromush says: Fix her... FIX HER!
Agatha says: We are bound to her, sisters...
Arthura says: It will destroy us, sister...
Daschla says: It is our sacred duty. The pact was sealed, the bargain made...
Arthura says: Then let it be done.
The group of val'kyr resurrects Sylvanas, sacrificing themselves in the process.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: I saw... only darkness.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: And as I drifted towards nothingness, a brilliant light appeared, then another, and another... My dear val'kyr.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: I know now - beyond a shadow of a doubt - that the val'kyr are our future.
Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: We will never stop fighting for Lordaeron. Never...

Alternatively, is the woman who stood up, looked around, and proudly proclaimed that the val'kyr are the future -- is that Sylvanas Windrunner? Or are we dealing with someone, something else entirely now? The val'kyr were able to resurrect thousands of dead soldiers with no consequence to them at all -- why did they have to die to bring Sylvanas back? Is it because she's already Forsaken, or is it because they weren't dying at all -- they were simply taking over Sylvanas' corpse?
Sylvanas Windrunner has always shown herself to be a woman of single-minded determination -- once she had her eyes set on something, she would stop at nothing until she obtained whatever it was she was after. In life, it was the defense of Silvermoon and the Sunwell -- and she was close to succeeding until her death at Arthas' hands. After her death, once Arthas' hold over her began to slip, it was to kill Arthas and make him suffer for every ounce of torment he'd put her through. When Arthas escaped to Northrend, Sylvanas bided her time with her newfound people, the Forsaken, waiting for the opportunity to strike.

The Horde may have forbidden the use of the Forsaken blight, but this made little to no difference to Sylvanas, who continued to use the blight at every opportunity when it looked as though it would give her the upper hand. She claimed to work for the Horde, but casual comments dropped here and there lead to the conclusion that Sylvanas isn't really working for the Horde -- she's working for herself and her people, and woe betide anyone who happens to be standing in her way.
She succeeded in snatching Gilneas from the worgen for now, and paid her life -- or unlife, such as it is -- for it. She was brought back by the val'kyr -- but at what cost? What does the banshee queen owe the val'kyr now, and when will we see the results of the undefined pact with the former servants of the Lich King?
Speaking of the Lich King, Garrosh asked a very important question -- what is the difference between Sylvanas and the Lich King, now? When we look at Arthas, he was a young man driven by one thing -- total eradication of the Scourge. Instead, he ended up becoming a kingpin in their forces, manipulated by the Lich King into serving him eternally, entwined as one being. With Sylvanas, she spent her life devoted to the defense of her people, and in the end, died trying to eradicate the Scourge that threatened the Sunwell.
After her death, she was raised as a servant of the Lich King. She managed to break free of that grasp, becoming her own entity, but her fate was perilously close to the one that Arthas suffered. In Northrend, the Lich King raised the undead as servants to his cause -- total eradication of life on Azeroth. Now, it seems as though Sylvanas is doing exactly the same thing. Perhaps the most chilling comparison can be found in the cinematic of Arthas' death:
"I see .. only darkness before me."
Sound familiar? It's exactly what Sylvanas said after her resurrection. The parallel to Arthas is made blatantly clear -- leading us to believe that there really is very little preventing Sylvanas from stepping up as a Lich Queen of sorts. For a time -- particularly during her attempts to get the blood elves included as members of the Horde -- it seemed as though Sylvanas was perhaps reaching back to her living roots in an attempt to steady herself, but those connections have all but slipped away in Cataclysm.
As for the answer to Garrosh's question ...
From tortured leader to triumphant overlord, in Cataclysm, Sylvanas has stepped up her role as leader of the Forsaken in a major way. But her plans beyond expanding Forsaken borders and boosting the population of the formerly living residents of Lordaeron are for now unclear. Will Sylvanas ultimately bow to the might of the Horde and take her place as a valuable ally, or will her continued use of the Forsaken blight and her odd alliance with the val'kyr prove to be her downfall? Hopefully we'll see some of these questions addressed with future Cataclysm content.Lady Sylvanas Windrunner says: Isn't it obvious, Warchief? I serve the Horde.
Sylvanas mockingly salutes Garrosh.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 6 of 6)
Michael Dec 20th 2010 2:04PM
Most of the undead you speak of broke away from the Forsaken for the Crusade. It is basically present in their reverence for the Light instead of the Forsaken Shadow; but it can be argued for hours on this.
One thing is for sure, when Sylvanas' plans become public, the Alliance and even Argent Crusade will probably have something to say about it...
Dalton Dec 20th 2010 3:01PM
ok real quick the horde didn't claim Gilneas its still being contested *points at Battle for Gilneas BG* but I really think your over thinking this... wow over thinking wow that sounds rong but your thinking about the whole pack thing way to much. What I got was the pact is simple there pact with Sylvanas was just them as her servants to help her with the forsaken nothing big how you put it. Its just me saying this though its what I think you could be right about that though never know but last thing I only see darkness I think that is undead like Arthas and Sylvanas being evil over staying there welcome big time is destined in death or it could be more they are both screwed in death forever to be in darkness.
deepred Dec 20th 2010 5:20PM
People have theorised about Sylvanas becoming the next Kael'thas or Arthas, which I'm not entirely convinced about. If the schimdt does end up hitting the fan, if anything she could well be the next Gul'dan. And there's still the unexplored arc of the 3 Windrunner sisters meeting again.
SacredFire Dec 20th 2010 5:55PM
Hmm... I'm really liking where this plot is going and would love to see it expanded more, maybe in a raid or new dungeon.
Btw does anyone else think there's a connection between the valkyr and our buddies the spirit healers?
Barachiel Dec 20th 2010 6:39PM
Actually, I'll do you one worse than her simply being a parallel to Arthas.
We all arrogantly assume Arthas faced the raid simply assuming he'd win. But what if, just what if, he actually put a contigency plan in place. What if he told the Val'kyr to go to Sylvanas upon his defeat, and as soon as the first viable host presented itself, they were to give their own lives to raise his dark essence?
What if Arthas is now a silent partner in Sylvanas' head, waiting to usurp her and be reborn? Not only is it a logical failsafe, but its also the ultimate insult to the woman who won her freedom from his will. Sylvanas could be fighting the same unconscious battle Medivh fought against Sargeras, only instead, she faces the Arthas' restless spirit (note I dont' say the LK because without Frostmourne or the Crown, he's not that being anymore.)
kebosangar Dec 20th 2010 11:01PM
Hey Anne,
Another bout of awesome KYL. Thank you.
Kaiderra Dec 21st 2010 11:47AM
Amid all this speculation that Sylvanas is becoming the new Lich Queen, don't forget that the shards of Frostmourne are unaccounted for. One of the devs pointed that out specifically.
Shock Dec 21st 2010 12:24PM
The pact may have been the promise to raise Arthas since he gave a face to the Lich King? Making him serve her - torture him as an eternal payback for what he put her through?
Who knows?
Darkseid Dec 22nd 2010 10:27AM
I don't want Sylvanas to be controled. I want everything she is doing to be of her own free will. I like her just the way she is. She is without a doubt, THE most interesting character in the entire game. I mean besides her, or when your doing "For the Horde/Alliance, how often do you really think about the faction leaders???
NEVER!
Why, because for all intents and purposes...they are pointless. They are book fodder. Did anyone care about Cairne before he was killed? No, he was just a dude holding a totem pole in TB. No interaction, nothing special, no different than a radom NPC you pass on the streets of Stormwind.
But Sylvanas...everyone knows her. She is a polarizing figure. She has purpose, determination, and motivation. What those motivations are now are unknown...only making her more interesting.
Making her 'being controled' would be nothing but a cop-out. Like TV series writers running out of ideas, so they throw 'time travel' into the story. We know Sylvanas is about 1 thing and 1 thing only....protecting her people. She failed at it in life, and she is determined not to in death. She will do anything.....ANYTHING...to protect her people from enemies, be they at home or abroad.
So, the question is, what makes her any different from Arthas...well thats simple. She knows she's doing it. Arthas was so driven that he was blind to what was happening to him. Sylvanas has proven that if nothing else, she is calculating. And walking blindly into anything is not her way. The coup in the Undercity, of course she knew, getting shot by Godfrey, all part of the plan.
The only question is....what is that plan. And thats what we'll all have to wait and see. Lets just hope it plays out, and least partially in game. I loved The Shattering, but I still would have liked to see more of those events play out in game rather than on paper.
So heres to Sylvanas...the one faction leader that actually makes us care about faction leaders. Don't hate...appreciate!
Bobby Jan 16th 2011 6:56AM
I recall one quest in which you all out kill alliance-associated humans and raise them. They are immediately loyal to the Forsaken. Why the hell are they? We are told that the Forsaken have free will and it seems many do, Voss as an example. But in this case, they were just killed by the Forsaken and are almost immediately all-out for the cause of the Forsaken. The whole idea that killing people and then ressurecting them for you only works when they dont have free will, which the Forsaken are supposed to have. It is mentioned that the ressurection process effects people differently. In the intro questline, that is exemplified by a loyalty to some nobody who was also just ressurected. Perhaps the weak-willed humans of the world will join up with the Forsaken, but I still find the scenario odd.