Blizzard on 2200 rating PvP weapon availability

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

1-26-2011 @ 8:20PM

wutsconflag said...

While I understand their reasons for wanting to delay the availability of these weapons, I foresee a LOT of incoming QQ.

1-26-2011 @ 10:02PM

Kyle said...

Unrelated, but as a long time WoW player, I really wish the community would collectively drop the word "QQ" altogether. I have only ever seen it used by elitists and jerks, and anytime I hear anyone use it, I just lose some respect for them. It's on the same level as "nub" and any variant thereof. I'm probably one of the few though.

1-26-2011 @ 11:02PM

gewalt said...

qq more kyle

1-27-2011 @ 1:23AM

Kyle said...

That's the best you can come up with? Pathetic.

1-28-2011 @ 7:32AM

Psiwave said...

QQ is bad, but 'Bad' is worse, as in 'Terribad' or 'bads' I can't help but mentally downvote comments using these terms. I've just never seen it used in a comment that was constructive or even accurate.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.