Skip to Content
1-30-2011 @ 4:57PM
"No gear in forms If you spend a lot of time admiring your character, this spec's not for you."This is the same CRAP excuse used for Trees when they lost their form. If you want to see your damn armor DON'T play a freaking shape shifter class!!!!!!
1-30-2011 @ 5:54PM
"If you want to see your damn armor DON'T play a freaking shape shifter class!!!!!!"That's exactly what he said in the quote that you yourself reposted. Though he said it in a more reasonable way.
1-30-2011 @ 6:07PM
That was not directed at the author, it was directed at the people who think it is a viable excuse for removing tree form. If the "buffs" from tree form were the problem, then remove the buffs! Make them a GCD spell. Why not remove chicken form if that was the case...no one has EVER given a good reason for removing the shape shifting element from healers.But you know...you're right. I apologize for stating my opinion and for re-iterating a point given by the author.WTB delete post button.
1-30-2011 @ 7:40PM
Relax, Kole. It's really not necessary to be so aggressive, especially on a point that A. wasn't even part of the article, and B. won't get you anywhere. So you're mad they took away Tree as a shape-shift. We get that. Go yell at Blizz for it-- not at those who may or may not agree with you, here.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.