Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-08-2011 @ 9:07AM
kbelt said...
Dear Survival Hunters,
WHAM!
Reply
2-08-2011 @ 9:34AM
Lonecow said...
Yeah they got nerfed hard but I can really understand the reasoning. Marksmanship is supposed to be the big dps tree. Survival is supposed to be about...survival. It should be more of a pvp or soloing tree. It never made any sense for it be be about dps.
2-08-2011 @ 10:04AM
Krytture said...
For real! Last night in BWD, I was pulling 13k steady as BM, a survival hunter was doing 19k. Looking at the activity log, our shots were pretty well matched, but his damage was just through the roof!
Though, I would have preferred to have just been boosted up there with him rather then have him drug down. But ya, someone was going for a homerun with that nerfbat!
2-08-2011 @ 11:06AM
Noyou said...
Except if you think the best survival is to kill your enemy as quick as possible. :) It was fun while it lasted. I'm a little sad I didn't get to take full advantage of all it's glory with all my alts. It will be time to revisit the offspec.
2-08-2011 @ 11:40AM
Azurite said...
@Lonecow:
SV shouldn't be able to pull good dps? They should be for PvP?
That's like saying Frost Mages shouldn't pull good dps because they've always been considered as the PvP Mage tree.
Every single Hunter tree is supposed to pull good dps, but thing is SV was pulling waay more DPS than the other two. With these changes, they'll probably be about the same.