Skip to Content
2-16-2011 @ 3:09PM
Im not one that usuall QQs over nerfs. I know that I'll just find a work around. What I don't get about blizzard is what did they expect? They nerfed Prayer of Healing the Disc only group heal and buffed shields. Of course people are now spamming it more. I use it now as a group heal. When i know a group damage is coming (maloriak) i spam it on everyone then let the holy priest get everyone up while i focus on the tank. Pw:s isn't the only spell I use by far but it of course is one of my most used ones. How else am I supposed to keep up my raid?
2-16-2011 @ 3:43PM
"When i know a group damage is coming (maloriak) i spam it on everyone then let the holy priest get everyone up while i focus on the tank. Pw:s isn't the only spell I use by far but it of course is one of my most used ones. How else am I supposed to keep up my raid?"I assume you're referring to his AOE flame attack? The raid should be stacked during this *anyway*, except for the OT and whoever has Consuming Flames, so... use PW:B. Throw a PW:S on the OT and use Pain Suppression if adds get too high. A couple PoHs immediately after gets the group back to where they should be. Use your full toolset.IMO, you shouldn't *ever* use PW:S for raid healing (I haven't). It really wasn't mana-efficient before and definitely won't be now.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.