Drama Mamas: The case of the underage scammer
Drama Mamas Lisa Poisso and Robin Torres are experienced gamers and real-life mamas -- and just as we don't want our precious babies to be the ones kicking and wailing on the floor of the checkout lane next to the candy, neither do we want you to become known as That Guy on your realm.
It's always more interesting when Lisa and I disagree. This week is very interesting. Let's get right to it.
Drama Mama Robin: Remorseful, you need to stop worrying about scarring this child now. So what if he did cry himself to sleep? He tried to scam you! One of the most important lessons kids need to learn is that their actions have consequences. Also, it's obvious you reached him. So no, he's not scarred. He's a better person for it. But let's say you went off on him less constructively. Let's say you were profanely insulting and made disparaging remarks about his sexual prowess or something. It's still doubtful you scarred him for life, he probably hears worse at school and it's not your fault that he's wandering around unsupervised on the internet.
We've talked about Unintentional Child Encounters before. Remember when Enraged Mom got aggroed by raunchy guild chat? I bet that kid's playground cred went up when he told his school friends the naughty stories he heard.
Here are some things to remember when recovering from a UCE:
Drama Mama Lisa: Ouch. I can't shrug off your behavior in this situation, Remorseful, and I can't condone it. I have a problem with your eye-for-an-eye behavior; that's how today's abysmally low internet behavior standards have come about in the first place. I can't advocate contributing to it.
Remorseful, you relentlessly trolled this player. What he did was wrong, but you went after him maliciously with the intent to get under his skin. Sure, as you say, "what I did was only words" -- but that's what an online environment is, "only words." Those words and their effects are still quite real. You set out to cause another player frustration. You suspect he was in tears at one point. That's trolling -- and you knew it, too, as we see from your rationalizations ("He deserved it.").
Nobody deserves poor behavior in return for mistakes of his own. Patrolling the internet and teaching people lessons is not your business. If someone attempts to scam you in game, report him through in-game channels. Ignore him. Heck, make a simple, straightforward warning to other players in trade chat, if he continues to advertise what you know he doesn't have, and let him suffer the consequences. Protect yourself, yes -- but for goodness sake, don't feed the trolls.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Address the issue at hand -- the scamming -- and don't get sucked into atrocious behavior of your own.
I disagree with Robin that the possibility that young players might hear and see similar (or worse) behavior at school somehow excuses anything. I have a grade-schooler and a high-schooler of quite different temperaments. They're not angels; they both have their moments. However, both of them choose to avoid other kids who (as my daughter so gently puts it) "act sassy." And guess what? My kids are not angelic exceptions. They're real, "regular" kids -- and they don't like bad behavior. They know it hurts, and they don't tolerate it among their classmates and friends. Bottom line: Plenty of kids avoid other kids who scam, troll and get up in other people's faces in game and in real life. I can't excuse trolling this other player simply based on the fact that "he's probably heard worse" and "everyone else does it" -- because frankly, not everyone does. And plenty of kids avoid others who do.
I realize that you probably went into this situation with good intentions. Here are four questions you can ask yourself that I've found to be very helpful in helping you decide whether what you're about to say is the right way to go:
Dodge the drama and become that player everyone wants in their group with a little help and insight from the Drama Mamas. Remember, your mama wouldn't want to see your name on any drama. Play nice ... and when in doubt, ask the Drama Mamas at robin@wowinsider.com.
It's always more interesting when Lisa and I disagree. This week is very interesting. Let's get right to it.
So... Here's my story. The first part is probably pretty typical, but it's what I did in response that I'm conflicted about. I feel I could use the advice of someone who understands WoW.
I saw somebody advertising in trade that he was selling the ruby shades for 500g. I'm not sure why I thought even for a second that it might be real; even on a low-pop server, that's two orders of magnitude low. But I did, so I arranged to meet with the "seller". He expressed some hesitation about the 500g price and we negotiated a higher price - none of which turned out to matter, since it quickly became clear that he did not have the shades at all. At one point he put an item with the same icon as the shades (yes, I have seen the real ones) into the trade box.
So I took an approach which I have used on various manner of ill-behaved players before, and gave him a lecture. This was not just any lecture. I am not religious, but I imagine I would have made a Sunday-school teacher proud. I lead off with, paraphrasing, "I am going to waste more of your time than you wasted of mine," and touched on such topics as why attempting to rip people off is wrong, why the money one might hypothetically get by doing so would not give one satisfaction, and why it's not okay just because you're anonymous on the internet.
This in general worked pretty well. I think possibly he was more willing to put up with it because my character's name was female, but I suppose I'll never know. I know he was frustrated with me, because he said such things as "can u stop talkin to me !!!!!!!!!!!" and "STOP TALKIN TO ME NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!" (both verbatim quotes), and I suspect I had him in tears at one point. I finally released him after about fifteen or twenty minutes (he didn't know how to use ignore, and I had coolly mentioned that I was willing to make alts to keep bugging him if he tried that route, to discourage that line of thought), by which time his tone had changed considerably and I felt there was a fair chance he might actually understand some of my points.
So far, so good, right? When you play with the adults, you run the risk that somebody might moralize at you! After all, what I did was only words. And very polite words; I never called him anything dirty; the worst appellation I used was "troll". How can that be wrong? He deserved it. And the praise from guildies for putting a troll in his place certainly felt good.
But... Well... It came out in the course of the conversation that he was eleven years old. I believe this, as he had no reason to lie. And by the end of it he seemed to halfway think I was his friend, but I was still being rather brusque with him. I feel my tone could have been less harsh. I didn't intend to convey the message that he's inherently bad and can do no good - that will give him self-esteem problems and lead to bad stuff. I just wanted to convey that he was a good person who did a bad thing, and I think I went way overboard for that.
Could I have done some damage? I'd hate to think of this kid crying himself to sleep, or quitting the game, or something like that. I am entirely self-taught in my own school of unsolicited advice of this nature, so I've had no guidance for how much is enough.
I'm having trouble conveying exactly what the nature of my conflict here is. I guess I just want you to sign off and say it was okay, or that it wasn't - I, unlike an eleven-year-old, can handle criticism. Please let me know what you think!
Thanks,
Ironically Remorseful
We've talked about Unintentional Child Encounters before. Remember when Enraged Mom got aggroed by raunchy guild chat? I bet that kid's playground cred went up when he told his school friends the naughty stories he heard.
Here are some things to remember when recovering from a UCE:
- Don't feel bad about behaving like an adult in a teen rated game, where we are all warned that online experience may vary. Many parents use video games as an electronic babysitter. They have no idea there are real people talking to their kid and think WoW is just another Super Mario Brothers. So they don't realize that their kid is encountering real people making age assumptions. If they are letting their kid (whether they know it or not) hang out with the grownups, then don't feel guilty about acting like one.
- Kids are mean to each other. You think your yelling at this kid about scamming may have hurt his feelings? Even if you're right, it doesn't hurt as much as the kid he thought was his best friend dropping him as soon as the cool kid asked him to. The kids start forming cliques and making up nasty things to say to each other as early as kindergarten, if not before. (This was a bit of a shock to me. I don't remember it being like this in the ancient days of my early education.) Some stranger he can't see yelling at him is just not going to hurt as much as someone he has to deal with 5 days a week, several hours a day.
- Children are resilient. There are so many more horrible things that can be going on in any child's life that are going to cause him emotional harm. And yet, so many children grow up to be responsible, productive adults. I mean, all of our childhoods sucked in one way or another, right? We just get over it or we seek help to get over it. Strangers yelling at them in video games is not one of those things children need to go to therapy for. It's just one of those things they will chalk up to experience and adjust their behavior accordingly.
Remorseful, you relentlessly trolled this player. What he did was wrong, but you went after him maliciously with the intent to get under his skin. Sure, as you say, "what I did was only words" -- but that's what an online environment is, "only words." Those words and their effects are still quite real. You set out to cause another player frustration. You suspect he was in tears at one point. That's trolling -- and you knew it, too, as we see from your rationalizations ("He deserved it.").
Nobody deserves poor behavior in return for mistakes of his own. Patrolling the internet and teaching people lessons is not your business. If someone attempts to scam you in game, report him through in-game channels. Ignore him. Heck, make a simple, straightforward warning to other players in trade chat, if he continues to advertise what you know he doesn't have, and let him suffer the consequences. Protect yourself, yes -- but for goodness sake, don't feed the trolls.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Address the issue at hand -- the scamming -- and don't get sucked into atrocious behavior of your own.
I disagree with Robin that the possibility that young players might hear and see similar (or worse) behavior at school somehow excuses anything. I have a grade-schooler and a high-schooler of quite different temperaments. They're not angels; they both have their moments. However, both of them choose to avoid other kids who (as my daughter so gently puts it) "act sassy." And guess what? My kids are not angelic exceptions. They're real, "regular" kids -- and they don't like bad behavior. They know it hurts, and they don't tolerate it among their classmates and friends. Bottom line: Plenty of kids avoid other kids who scam, troll and get up in other people's faces in game and in real life. I can't excuse trolling this other player simply based on the fact that "he's probably heard worse" and "everyone else does it" -- because frankly, not everyone does. And plenty of kids avoid others who do.
I realize that you probably went into this situation with good intentions. Here are four questions you can ask yourself that I've found to be very helpful in helping you decide whether what you're about to say is the right way to go:
- Is it truthful? (The points you were ultimately hoping to communicate about scamming were on target, sure.)
- Is it helpful? (You sound uncertain that it was -- in fact, you are fearful that your words were actually harmful instead. And you certainly showed him that an in-your-face, manners-be-damned attitude is the way things are done -- probably not so helpful to your cause.)
- Is it kind? (I think it's fairly clear that your methods were neither polite nor compassionate.)
- What is my motivation and genuine intention here? (Why do you feel compelled to offer so much of what you call "unsolicited advice"? Whose emotions and needs are being served when you saddle up?)
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Drama Mamas
Patch 5.2 interview with Dave Kosak
Inside an old alt's vault
The latest patch 5.2 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news






Reader Comments (Page 3 of 9)
MikeLive Feb 25th 2011 9:17AM
Does Blizzard respond to reports of children under the rated age playing the game? It is ultimately up to the parents to judge whether the child is mature enough or not, and perhaps they are, but I think it would be good of Blizzard to send a quick email to the parents after such reports reminding them that it is mostly adults playing the game.
PaulC Feb 25th 2011 9:21AM
Did you handle the situation correctly? You didn't handle it TERRIBLY, I mean you didn't swear and carry on and bully the kid. Do you feel like a jerk? If you do then I would say "no, you did not handle it correctly."
EVERY time I deal with someone in game I assume that they are a 12 year old kid, MY 12 year old kid. How would I want my 12 year old daughter treated in game? It may become clear that they are NOT in fact 12 and then I may change my tone, but thats my starting position. I feel like that makes everything go smoother.
Darky Feb 25th 2011 9:34AM
I dont mean to be rude or something but it IS in fact a teen rated game in which case it's perfectly acceptable to assume they are 13+ which is an age of rebellion swearing and toilet humour, hence trade.
They also test their morals to see what they can get away with, a lot of lessons learnt beforehand are fairly irrelevant and I doubt a scolding that sounds to me like a teacher telling a student off for stealing someone's pencil or gameboy.
I am not a parent but at the same time this gives me an outsider's perspective as a parent generally has the instinct to molly coddle their child and protect them from life's downs and restrict their ups so they get a proper outlook.
However I have friends who were in such situation in which their parents chose not to punish them. They then went on to choose a rather poor way of life. Whom are only just now (as they hit their 20s) realising where they went wrong, stealing in a game is still stealing, its not worse than robbing a supermarket, as someone values this, it takes someones spare time to make and is technically a currency to buy other things that people put a lot of value on themselves; (far more than a store would to a toy or somesuch thing).
IF the scolding was too polite they would most likely just shrug it off and keep doing whatever it was they were doing in the first place.
This isn't a judgement on you as a person (because lets be honest here i barely know you) but rather a statement of my opinion on reprimanding children when they slip out of the lines.
PS:
Just a little thing i noticed, what are the odds of an 11 year old knowing about the value of ruby glasses when they dont know how to ignore? (i suppose they could've seen someone in trade selling it for a lot but i rarely if ever see them in trade, they're usually put straight into the AH).
I would've thought that someone of his age would say "WTS Sand drake 500g" than the ruby glasses as its a fairly well known about BoE.
Darky Feb 25th 2011 9:35AM
Holy schmolie that was a big chunk of text >_< and here I need to do a 600 word essay for my course >_>.
Sorcha Feb 25th 2011 9:44AM
I wouldn't talk to a 13 year-old any differently than a 12 year-old, personally.
Zal Feb 25th 2011 9:48AM
The problem with this line of reasoning is that when you are still in the right and telling a kid what they did is wrong, you do still bad for it. Even though you are setting the child straight, you are still being mean in a sense. To teach people a lesson, even through lecture, you have to be mean to them and it is not easy to be mean to kids. That is why some people have problem disciplining their children.
I don't think Remorseful went about this wrong, he actually did it better than some of the parents I have seen handle their own children. He was strict, insistent but did not take a stance of insulting. He got the child's attention so that he could continue to lecture, then explained in detail what he did was wrong, why it was wrong, and why it is wrong to do it to people online. That those colourful characters running around with names over their head, speaking in trade are not just the "game" doing things. Each of those represents a person, another human being. They are not just streams of bits given visual representation, there is a person behind all that. Someone that this child needs to respect and treat in a manner he would like to be treated. I hope Remorseful managed to do the portion of a lecture of turning it around and getting the child to understand it from their perspective. That if they would hate for someone to do that to them, they should not do it to others.
Raising a child properly is not the sole responsibility of the parents, it is a task of that child's community. They should be invested with the proper upbringing of a child, but the parents have to be present more than physically to ensure what lessons are being taught get through effectively. As well that the knowledge from the community is not under minded by thoughtless, irresponsible parents.
icepyro Feb 25th 2011 3:11PM
You know, I started to think Remorseful went overboard until I read your comment. How would I handle it if it was "MY 12 year old daughter"? Heck, I think Remorseful let him down easy.
See the problem with this stance is that I would actually treat another child differently than my own. It's everyone's role to help set a kid straight. It's the parents role to hand out additional punishment to deter bad behavior in the future. (It's the store employees prerogative to try to calm a bratty kid, it's the parents to spank them for it.)
In other words, if it was my kid who happened not to be in the house (maybe the ex has them for the weekend?) then I would have done everything Remorseful did at the least. If it was someone else's kid, I probably would have backed off on the threats of alt harassment, but still given them a lecture.
Everyone feels bad when they make anyone else feel bad. You will feel bad when you punish a child. You will feel bad when you fire someone and they cry, even if you hadn't seen them accomplish their job for the entirety of their employment. If you don't feel bad, you didn't get through to them, or you are not "human" (Human is in quotes because different people set different values to humanity. This statement reflects my own values which will not be moved by others and should not be taken as fact or debated).
Darky Feb 25th 2011 9:21AM
If he feels bad about it then there is hope for him yet.
Moobs Feb 25th 2011 9:22AM
If it seems to good to be true then it probably is!
Berrating him for wasting your time a little excessive, I mean you wasted more time berrating him.
Conitnueing after he asked you to stop, that was just mean.
Finding out he was just a child, it does not matter at this point you did what you did.
Lesson learned tell the person your reporting them for thier actions and save your self the grief.
Kunikenwad! Feb 25th 2011 10:30AM
"Berrating him for wasting your time a little excessive, I mean you wasted more time berrating him."
That is EXACTLY the point. If we don't take time to teach our children, then who will? "Just report and move on lulz" is probably the exact type of parenting and support that failed to educate this child on what is right and wrong.
AudreyR Feb 25th 2011 10:59AM
"Our" child? I have no clue how well-travelled you are, but the child mentioned is certainly not my child and it is not my place nor my responsibility to parent that child.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm part of the village when it comes to children in my extended family and friends, but I leave the important bits of parenting to the actual parents.
Taking responsibility for parenting a child without the consent or knowledge of the child's parents is dancing on the line with a balance problem.
Kunikenwad! Feb 25th 2011 11:09AM
Teaching and parenting are two different things, my friend. His parenting structure obviously failed him in regards to stealing and how it is wrong. I have zero problems with someone then educating this child on what is right and wrong when it is an absolutely cut and dry case. This is no different than a shopkeeper catching some punk trying to steal from him and lecturing him ... except the shopkeeper could then also find the punk's parents and tell them all about their son's lawlessness. In WoW however, you don't have that luxury so I applaud Remorseful for doing what he did. Now threatening to troll on alts isn't good, but overall it was a good message to send. By just ignoring the problem if it's "not your kid" you're just giving this punk the idea that, "Well, no one I know caught me so ha!" As a society, we owe the next generation better than that.
AudreyR Feb 25th 2011 11:22AM
And there's a huge difference between "teaching" and "harassment." Even without rolling the alts, that line was clearly crossed.
The difference between Remorseful and and the shopkeeper in your example is that Remorseful neither owns the "shop", nor works there. As I said below, lecturing then notifying the proper authoraties is fine. Trying to keep the kid as a captive audience in a place where you have no authority is not.
AudreyR Feb 25th 2011 9:23AM
Giving the scammer a lecture and then reporting his behavior=fine.
Continuing to lecture them after they ask you repeatedly to stop talking to them=harrassment. Which is also reportable, btw.
One of the same things that you lectured him on can be applied to you as well. Just because you're anonymous doesn't make such behavior okay. You even expressed a willingness to create alts should he put you on the ignore list.
While the other player may not deserve much sympathy, your behavior doesn't cast you in a much better light.
AudreyR Feb 25th 2011 3:18PM
I don't understand why this is viewed as a black-or-white issue. Some people on here seem to think that if someone says that Remorseful handled the situation incorrectly, they're playing off the kid as innocent. It's not true at all. What's more is some are trying to put off such things as "what's wrong with this country."
Give it a rest! There are LOTS of reasons why prisons are full. Disagreeing with you is not one of them.
ambermist Feb 25th 2011 9:24AM
I agree with points in both of your answers:
I agree with Robin in that this is a teen-rated game full of teenagers and adults. It's not at all unfair to assume that the people with whom you're communicating fall into this age bracket. I also hate letting kids off the hook just because they're kids. A scammer is a scammer, regardless of age, and I really don't think Remorseful needs to worry about having scarred Scammer Boy for life. The kid probably went off, made up some bravado story to his friends about how he argued with this person on WoW and "totally showed him!" and then watched Cartoon Network for a few hours.
I agree with Lisa that the behavior was unnecessary, although I've done it too. It's easy to get annoyed with people who are downright jerks, and this kid was being a jerk. I don't think it matters how old he is; we shouldn't act this way towards other adults, either. I concur with the Trade chat warning, as it's usually what I do. For me, it's often an incessant beggar, so if I've explained to him why I won't give him gold and he still won't listen, I'll pop into Trade and say "So-and-so is begging, please don't encourage him by giving him your gold!" It makes him accountable for his actions to everyone, not just you.
I don't think you need to worry about him, though; just use it as a springboard into better in-game communication overall.
Aggrajag Feb 25th 2011 9:25AM
Regardless of his age he was a thief and he planned to steal.
Scum like this think they are entitled to goods that someone else has worked for; they're not - so make sure they know it and cut off their hands so they can't do it again.
Darkdust Feb 25th 2011 11:31AM
Seriously? A dumb kid is "scum" and deserves to have his hand cut off?
I know you're trolling, but how does this get upvoted? Has the Taliban started playing WoW?
Kids do dumb things. They need to learn their lessons, definitely, so that they become productive adults and valuable members of society. That doesn't make them "scum" -- who DIDN'T do dumb things when they were kids?
None of us, that's who.
AudreyR Feb 25th 2011 3:25PM
Glad to know you think my 3-yr-old nephew, who's going through his "MINE!" phase is scum.
Tim Feb 25th 2011 9:26AM
I agree with both the mama's on certain points. But Lisa, you are looking at this from a rational, calm point. Remorseful was just *almost* scammed by a little turd. I would probably be just as pissed as they were. You are not thinking all too clearly when that happens. Now, in hindsight, Remorseful is worried she caused harm. That is good that they are worried about that, as I would be. It's a human nature thing. But I'm sure not everyone would go off half cocked like Remorseful, or I for that matter, would.
All in all the little turd deserved at least the first half of the scolding. Then cooler and more adult heads should have prevailed.