Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-02-2011 @ 1:21AM
Pumabackup said...
initially, i hated this change. im not a fan of other classes being given abilities that were previously specific to one certain class, and as a boomkin, this hit close to home. in my raid, i'm more often than not the one who handles the b-rezzing (we also have a tree and bear in the group), and the more i think of it, the more i doubt that DK's will be chosen for a rez over a druid. for starters, the DK needs to build up the runic power to use it, while we druids just needs to pop a quick cast out there and be done. druids also have the glyph of rebirth, which brings people back with 100% health and mana, so the ability itself is still more useful then either a DK's or lock's rez.
i think right now, my biggest peeve with it is just the idea of a DEATH knight bringing someone back to LIFE. however, if they ever changed it so the rezzed person uses a random undead model, but retains all they're gear and abilities...that might make it a little more believable.
so pros:
----groups that dont have a druid or warlock can still have access to a brez
----a little less stress off of resto and tank druids
cons:
----more utility sharing across classes, reducing the uniqueness of the classes
----the idea is just absurdly silly
----we no longer have a mini temp rez that doesnt count against the limit